Search results

I agree with the first part. I think politicians and their immediate family getting money or anything else needs to have strict laws. People getting new jobs after their parents are in office should be looked at closely. Cough Hunter cough. I think that having children can be a big personal...

I strongly disagree with setting criteria like this to vote. It invites a lot of complications, exceptions, and nit picking. What if people have a medical illness that doesn't let them have children? What if their child died and they got divorced? There are too many situations that come about...

Again I would argue that the best system is a voting share system. Each person is given 1 share at their majority and after that they can purchase shares. People with money are contributing members of society will keep and buy shares, while useless people will sell their shares for money...

That is why shares are limited to 0.001% per person. You would have to rope A LOT of people in to have enough of a block. That also risks defections, deaths, ect. EDIT: That would mean that 100,000 people could control the entire nation, theoretically. But if each person gets a single share at...

I disagree with this. Trade school is a viable alternative. Higher education clearly isn't all its cracked up to be, Women Studies...... Even someone that graduated high school and started their own business. Here is an interesting alternative. Treat the government like a corporation and limit...

Make no weaseling out. Sure there would be easy posts, Japan is a good example of this. But don't allow any exceptions. Do your time to get the vote or not. All hail Skynet, our new machine overlord.

Have a citizen service as an alternative, for 4 years, compared to say the militaries 2. Make trails, fix up things, ect. That way even disabled people who pay taxes can still earn citizenship.

Just Spaceship Troopers the vote. No voting unless you serve in the military to become a real citizen.