Search results

Honestly the issue I have with democracy is that I see it as fairly easy for bad actors to subvert and use it against a nation. It's not about removing the rights of people to vote; it's about setting limitations on what can and cannot be altered and changed by voting. The American...

Only if the people you are disenfranchising are willing to start them. Otherwise they remain disenfranchised. Just losing the right to vote is not going to be enough for people to freak out and push the civil war button, nor would still paying taxes. There's this weird and hilarious fantasy...

If you're restricting the votes of people then you have done away with 'rights' being anything more than something the government gives you anyways. So you'd sure be able to tell people who cannot vote to pay taxes. What's the alternative? The government can simply deny you access to basic...

The reality is that when you remove voting from one group and not another you are simply trying to direct politics in a way that you want. So what would you want people to vote for? Or more specifically; what boundaries do you want to be absolute? Because you will be narrowing the gradient...

I'm against the idea of democracy anyway; I think it's a weak and abuseable system when globalisation and rootless megarich people exist. But if you have one, then citizens should be able to vote. It's not an issue of 'who can vote' it's an issue of what you are teaching and showing people...

I advocate a one man one vote policy. I am the one man who gets to vote, next election it will be the responsibility of another man who can vote.