Search results for query: *

Because real life isnt an RTS and the limiting factor in the success of our military is not "enough bodies".

Holy mother of goalpost shift batman! You go from "Humans will become extinct because clone babies are as vital and proliferable as the car" to "It is possible to create humans in a lab in an extremely limited context, therefore you're wrong!" You seem to have "accidentally" replaced my...

Right, like I said, orders of magnitude off what we're talking about. You can drop a nuke off a Drone right now. Every single second. People in broad terms have no vital existential reason to not drive a car or to shoe horses. If your only barometer of the development of technology and the...

Your second point is an unrelated non-sequitur, "robot military only" is not only not the topic of discussion, but also currently infeasible in a way that having an all male infantry force is not. You are talking about orders of magnitude difference in scale of restructuring and cost. It's like...

Is asking someone to take a 90% chance of loss the same as asking someone to take a 10% chance of loss? This argument equally applies to taking the crippled, the insane, and those with terminal illnesses. Yet their chances are enormously better. It's like putting an asthmatic in a position to...

Even "particularly strong females" take permanent joint injuries at a rate an order of magnitude higher than the men. Their ability to perform short-term is not the only problem. You're just taking fantastically exceptional women physically, true patriots no less, and crippling them.

"The other feminism waves were based" Ah this old myth. The first "wave" of feminist was a radical movement responsible for terrorist attacks and had very little to do with people deciding to give women rights, the the second "wave" of feminism was outright, unabashedly, openly communist.

Alternatively we could have children vote. See how easy this is? Just because something exists somewhere on a sliding scale, does not actually make it congruent with other objects on that scale.

I believe my first or second post in this thread suggests exactly that. Israel puts them in the field however, which has been crippling their joints permanently in record numbers. Most women aren't feminist, traditionalist women are also statistically far happier. Further, restricting the...

See, theres your problem.

Yes but the army has the choice of who to take. They don't need everyone. Not selecting a woman (who will become crippled) does not cost you a soldier, it just means you'd take a man (who is much less likely to be crippled) instead.

Actions that require the input of effort or resources are justified against the respective state of their inaction. This is a basic function of the human brain that we call "decision making". I dont think anyone here is saying that. Ah yes, a fair and total description of modern human...

Did you mean Sketchy

I dont see how this actually connects to what I said.

Why doom a woman to a probable crippling when there are men volunteering to do the job with a fraction of the risk?

Polygamy, even with steep social and legal penalties, still happens at a tremendous rate. What is a survivable problem for society is often an unnecessary weakness in a military. Being in active military service cripples women at an order of magnitude higher rate than it does men. Asking a...