Search results for query: *

There's no 'socio' in the socioeconomic progress. The old folks better like it or else. Meaning change comes in patterns. Nobody can be king of the world with paleolithic technology, but they can assemble large coalitions when it looks like there's a problem. Faster change comes from...

They'll be patient as hell. But you don't make it to 300-500, in a prehistoric environment, without also being able to turn on a dime and shank some people. Young people mad that you old folks are holding them back? Well, not a problem- just through darwinian selection, you made it to this age...

If they have an extended lifespan, it doesn't make much sense if they have an extended senescence too. It would generally lead to them never ever reaching their max lifespan. Animals with very long lives don't have extended senescence. At worst, they have a long period of declining vigor...

At premodern death rates, dying at or slightly below their 'young adult' rate, most people die before 100 anyways. I've done the math. https://forums.spacebattles.com/threads/what-would-human-society-be-like-if-women-lived-two-five-or-ten-times-longer-than-men.590538/page-6#post-41799953...