Search results for query: *

They're not conservatives. They're not conserving traditions, they're trying to destroy them.

The 4chan crowd shouldn’t be associated with honest men trying to keep their heads above the deluge.

Point being that modern (as in post-suffrage) feminists only seem to have a position of opposing everything antifeminist men propose, which in practice means opposing everything evangelicals and Chuds would like keeping or opposing.

Ireland only exists because of protection from Britain, Greece because of money from Germany, and Poland because of Russians giving Germany the middle finger. It's not sustainable.

There's a reason why millions of men (and women) who do consider the protection of women a top priority would never call themselves "feminists". Spite isn't a rational long term policy.

You do realise that that's literally my point? And I'd say it's closer to 100%.

Tradwives are definitely an interesting new variation of the OF girl. They evolved to advertise themselves to the one class of male customer that will never openly admit to watching OF: the misogynist that unironically thinks that women's rights is a bad thing. So all they do is wear expensive...

Ok. Let's see whose ideals outlives whose.

We can take this to another thread, if you really wish. Altogether, I've found you to be on the 95th percentile of reason on this site. You should really watch less pornography. All I said is that I don't argue with said people. I'm not the type to dictate what people do in the safety of their...

The "of ex-colonies" part is important. And of course, the US is the exception. Back to topic, reddit is in full throated defense of that asinine Man vs Bear trend. It's really fun to watch the controversial comments to see saner people metaphorically rip their hair out over it. I actually...

Not much of one. There are people even I won't argue with, and Creationists are near the top of that list. Right after Maoists, Greens, and nationalists of ex-colonies.

Not at all. Just a lot of random chance. Some men and women get to pass their genes on, others don't. It's really that simple, and you'd need to be wilfully blind to ignore that. For example, imagine if there's a disease that only kills redheads and it devastates a region? Well, that would mean...

True enough, I'll remove the personal attacks. The rest I'll leave as it is. Including your very honest denial of evolution, something that is common knowledge even to backwards farmers who see how breeding for certain traits works.

6000 years is just as bad as six, matey. And it explicitly talks about how it took six days, and God rested on the seventh. Cool, not the point. Now unless you can prove that all life is descended from just one surviving couple in the Levant.... Ah, an evolution denier. Neat. Stop watching...

Based on the fact that the Earth was not, in fact, made in a week. That there was no flood that destroyed humanity, except for one dude, his family, and two of every animal on Earth. That humans were not made, they evolved out of apes. That the Tower of Babel myth is bunkum. That there are no...

A lie that's ten thousand years old is still a lie.

Sure, and Chinese nation is 4000 years old. I suppose you're a Jew or a Hindu? In either case, that's only true if you arbitrarily group together several different cultures that would have killed each other as enemy tribes.

Because children eventually grow up and stop believing in fairy tales. You didn't answer my question. Still, it was purely rhetorical.

No, because there wouldn't be any left. ...you really don't get along with women, do you?

Making policy decisions just to spite your enemies is, as we have all seen first hand, a really stupid idea. Sure, you really showed them misogynists, but the price really isn't worth it. Cutting your nose to spite your face isn't a sensible political strategy.