Search results

Fine...here's a submarine... ;)

Dat's sexy.

However, Ukraine doesn't have the money or facilities right now to use them.

That's the point of Cruisers. They're big enough that they threaten virtually everything. They're also big enough that they can pack some serious defensive depth in a squadron formation. Missile and torpedo threats can be dealt with to a fairly well too. Size also lets them pack some helos for...

@Sailor.X I'd prefer to see those 'proper' Cruisers operating independently as squadrons.

Backed upped by standard CIWS just in case...of course!

We need melta-guns!

51 holes! Jeebus!

That's still just a weird lookin' ship.

Well, from what I've heard, the darn things were just boondoggles from the get-go. So I can't say I'm sorry to see them go.

How old is the class?

Still cheaper than a new boat IIRC.

Someone do the math on the stress those shot imparted to the frame...cuz I'm just kinda curious.

I'm more thinking about (worried really) the potential leaking of high sub tech through the Australians and into China. I guess they'll dumb down the Las Angeles class boats if necessary?

That would be...a mistake in my mind.

USN plays Peekaboo.