Search results

See, this is where my question of, do we go off states or counties?

Neither if the two hypothetical ones would be a super power

People here have argued we would remain to super powers

And now you have a military that is in pieces, unable to maintaine the equipment it has, and the potential for the super advanced things we do have getting sold to our enemies. Congratulations. My whole point is that we would no longer be a military super power

All thier military stuff is from inside the US. But basically my point being that our current MIC would be destroyed in the sense of any capability to function.

In which case...that's bad news for us. Well, Lockheed Martin for instance has two factories. One in Palmdale California, where Skunk works, the place where things like the SR 71 were created, and Marrietta GA. Now, are we thinking the nations would be broken into by counties of hy states or...

I mean...do I need to point out Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and all those companies would reside in the woke nation due to the fact it agrees with them? Unless your saying they would run the companies in both nations. Like, you have a decent amount if stuff coming from right wing areas, but...

Same can be said for us.

And they would have access to various things that would let them be on equal footing.

But then you would not get all the benefits needed to survive. Military bases are often in blue cities. Due to nature of the areas they are in.

That is a other thing. A divided nation wouldn't be allowed without lines being redrawn

And...how would you keep the military together in such a way? A split like this would be a split along state lines, and would destroy any semblance of a combined military force, and would require some states in one country to rely upon states in others. This would lead to what would equal a...

And then you basically have a nation with no power in the world who will become food for those that will leverage this to either start wars, or surround the based side and leave them alone to fight them.

I agree with your last. There is also a VERY large amount of vets who wish they got these things free. Because it would make a good reasons for people to get in, do a single contract and leave to own a MG.

I mean, they can try but they won't actually be able too because of states saying no, and they wouldn't be able to effectively enforce it

It's bad when even Hogg calls it out. Fucking hell.

New Mexico governor banned carry

The officers have always been a political class. They will eventually get out or they will listen to the enlisted if they want to keep thier ship from being undermanned

They don't meet tanks when they uave F35s and a bunch if roid raging Marines

Services already don't allow us to carry on post and barracks people have to keep guns in the arms room. On post housing has to keep them locked up for the most part. This is probably part of the initiative to cut down on service member suicide. Gun being the main way. There are incentives that...