Search results

That is true. The kid was no innocent and started shooting. They at least gave the body camera to show the cops didn't shoot first, which was the maim argument that he was an unarmed black guy that got lit up 90 something times. Iirc the family is suing the police, so we should be able to...

So the car was his. He was already on parole for gun charges and they ran his plates and got something saying maybe a warrant or something. It definitely isn't a seat belt violation that's for sure, but he was a felon who they assumed still had a gun. Turns out they were right. The shooting is...

Yeah this destroys many cases. Some in which the proper suspect was arrested but...now they may be set free due to her stupidity

I mean, this thread will only show the bad. The recent shooting in Chicago where they unloaded 90 something rounds into a guy who shot at them first. It's a 2 sided coin

Example. You are walking down the sidewalk and a police dog escapes its handler or the handlers vehicle and attacks you unwarranted. The handler had nothing to do with it. Vs the Handler telling it to attack you

They are officers, as not all are weapons, or ones are both a tool and an officer Depends on situation.

They are officers of the law. In the sense they have badges

Oh yeah for sure, but there is enough to it that it would nit be possible. Youtuber Mandatoryfunday did a short on it

The military actually has in its VERY OWN justice system, the UCMJ, we are allowed to disobey illegal, immoral, and unjust orders. Firing on US citizens would be just that.

The military following orders stuff really has no precident. Very few if any service members will agree to shooting Americans. As for tje dog stuff, the dog is a police officer. That is why you sre treated worse. Better make sure what ever the reason they went after you in the first place to...

From what I understand the AG is trying to tell him to wait

The re trial is literally in the bag

Very truw

We always get he said she said in these. Wothout video evidence we have no clue. Remember, almost every person BLM says was innocent and the cops claimed otherwise, cops turned out to be telling the truth

Do European courts have a jury of thier peers?

So the judge can be overtly bias in his questioning? It would backfire with the US Court system

So have less and less cops as they are targeted by civil suites heavily, people not wanting to deal eith all of this stuff. Bad cops get in and don't wear body cams because they don't wanna suffer so more bad cops come in. You need to make a better argument.... Alright, that hasn't stopped...

And we get gun fights in the streets and look like Chicago on steroids. No thank you. Oh? You think that will stop them? The cop would still have to hire his own lawyers to counter it, and that is before it ever sees a judge. It may get dropped later, but after hours and money spent. What...

So...say the ideal person you want to be a cop becomes one. Arrests a black person in a major city who is resisting and everything, yelling I can't breathe, I am innocent, and is being restrained by this officer. He is getting sued and is going to lose his pay for months, family is going to have...

As they have pointed out. Sov citizens can sue because you violated thier rights. Basically damn near everything a cop does if someone claims otherwise, it can be a suit and even if the cop wins that is all the cops money gone paying fir the legal fees, because we all know the leftist will get...