Search results

Just wanna' leave this here: Another way the Feds might carry out gun confiscation? Going after the shops … or at least, targeting a few prominent ones in order to send a message that cows the rest into submission. :oops:

That, I can easily believe. But even if I didn’t, what’s definitely true is deliberate scouring or not, I can’t count all the stuff I’ve seen there one moment that disappeared without a trace the next. So, at the very least, “The internet is forever!” has its limits. At any rate, I suppose...

Sorry to hear that, but understandable. Mostly, I get tired of wading through all the “Gun control works!” crap they shoehorn into there whenever Australia comes up, when I just want the facts and no else. Will see what I can find as soon as I muster up the endurance to roll my eyes and snort...

Again, was looking more for actual documentation of the details you’re pointing at to show precisely why it’s suspicious. Not doubting you’re Australian or have noticed some “odd things” most of your countrymen are oblivious to. That said, more verification would be great, in the event that I...

Hmm, hmm… :unsure: Not sure I trust a message board without pointing me to further verification (like some declassified documents). But if that’s all true, then I guess the US isn’t alone in suspicious shootings where the intelligence agencies just stood idly by — or worse, had more of a hand...

Sorry to hear that. Didn't know you were Australian, but sounds like things suck on your end. :( Besides that, I thought I heard about a few shootings that still happened, even after the buyback post-Port Arthur? Weird how those got memory-holed, too, as I suspect they'd have run contrary to...

Anyway… While it’s a bit dated, the contents are as relevant as ever and should be watched by way more people than just Shane’s usual fans:

Actually? 🧐 Well, in any case, I shouldn't be surprised that common people who own guns for home defense, hunters who hunt their own game, and farmers and ranchers who kill of varmints feel "underrepresented" in the gun debate, if nothing else. For starters, when the Corporate Media doubles...

Thought you liked Togrutas, though? :P

Yeah, well, odds are they’ll crack down even harder if someone on the edge finally snaps and JFK’s him without warning. You know it, I know it, and there’s a good chance America’s hoplophobes are downright praying for it as we speak. At that point, they’ll have made a martyr out of the guy...

Speaking of 28th Amendment proposals:

Another Washington Gun Law update: Oh, boy, seems Blue-state legislators really can’t help themselves. Best-case scenario is they realize how unenforceable these laws are and back off… because I don’t so much as want to touch a worst-case scenario. :(

Kinda’ surprises me, actually, though that’s more because I haven’t been paying as much attention as I should. At any rate, I’m apprehensively curious as to how Judge Stephen McGlynn will react to all the mass-noncompliance from law enforcement and private citizens alike? Have long believed the...

Who bets they’ll turn this into the next January 6th? If so, I have no sympathy for them if it blows up in their face — much less for the judge that issued this ruling in the first place. :cautious:

How do you think that'd work in practice, out of curiosity? For one, I'm pretty skeptical of private nuke ownership, though I can also imagine them being prohibitively expensive to buy and maintain, as well as kept under 24/7 lock and key by the handful of super-rich people who do wind up...

Taking this here, since it's the general gun-policy thread: Okay, thanks. Have heard about private citizens owning lots of heavy weaponry, here and there, but not about the specific incident you've cited, so I'll check it out. Never said I agreed, at least not in practice. Problem is, I'd...