Search results

@ShadowArxxy I'm pretty sure that's supposed to be 0%, but like you said, not an absolutist. :V

Ah, I didn't realize that's how this worked. If that's the process, that's the process.

@ShadowArxxy I think the bigger problem is that it's going to the exact same people. Wouldn't they need to be "randomly" assigned from the available judges in the Circuit? It's pretty clear that the "majority of the Court" are attempting to guide judgements into a, let's say, more likely outcome.

I don't think so. I think this is a big ask, where they try to do something egregious then present something they want under cover of seeming like they're reasonable.

Called it.

No. It costs him nothing to admit something like this. While he gets brownie points about seemingly getting a clue, he'll stick push his shit in other ways. It's just a smokescreen.

Huh. So can I 3d print a firearm and tell the gov't to stick it or is that too broad an understanding of the ruling?

Lovely. Well, 10 years tops before Bruen is twisted to justify gun confiscation for everyone the Machine doesn't like.

You know, reading through all theses laws it doesn't seem like there any justification for the NFA or the AWB. Weird.

Well. Time to start using more cash.

Hmm. Now do the ATF.

Strictly speaking, that sounds like the ability to institute a draft and maintain the army for 2 year after its inception. In practice, the US government has generated the power to wage war forever illegally. The standing army was something the founders saw as the greatest threat to liberty and...

I don't think they could define them as dangerous and unusual if they are forced to examine the law from the time period leading up to its passing. As the text states, any other examination would require circular reasoning where automatics are "dangerous and unusual" because the government have...

Nullify, nullify, nullify.

Are you joking? The government practices civil asset forfeiture on the regular. Even if a specific court where you try to get your guns back isn't in on it someone they know is.

So a few points here. Firstly, all manufacturing, sale, and transfer of nuclear weapons is done by private entities. That's what Lockheed, Raytheon, Boeing, etc are. Secondly, the same arguments that apply to the lawful ownership of guns, body armor, knives ANYTHING apply here. The restriction...

As an absolutist, I can confidently say we don't need to think about this. Private citizen must be able to create, own, operate, sell, and transfer the full NBC suite of weaponry.

Would you like to link a nonpaywalled version of this? Or an archive?