Search results

I have not said that at all. In fact, I gave you a proposed experimental design. I think at our current level of technology, the political and financial context of scientific research, and the extreme difficulty of creating a test environment over the time scales we'd need to properly test the...

I snipped it out because it's literally just an example of homologous adaptation. Giving it a fancy name doesn't change what it actually is, convergent traits in divergent genetic branches. On the contrary, and as you are claiming, they are very very stable. So much so, that they can remain...

This is a good point which I can concede. No. I think they know exactly the type of experiment needed to fully test and falsify the theory, don't be obtuse. I think they know and have no interest running an experiment to falsify the theory given the sheer difficulty of such an undertaking...

Man was created from dust and women from the man's rib? Adam apparently lived ~900 years?

This was not produced through sexual reproduction, it was produced via cultivar hybridization. This article misunderstands the main drive of natural selection. The correct means of testing this would be to introduce one or two extreme environmental constraints into a breeding population and...

🤷‍♂️ Not my problem. I'm not a creationist.

It directly contradicts Genesis.

Implying this wasn't a statement designed to do so.