Search results

  1. R

    What if the British Isles and England's overseas colonies were ISOT from July 1693 to July 1593?

    Why, do you think the Church makes better use of the warning of what is coming than dissident monks and priests and princes pissed with the Church? Do you think 1693 England would especially favor Hungary? Or Hungary would make better use of future knowledge than the Turks? The Incas may not...
  2. R

    What if the British Isles and England's overseas colonies were ISOT from July 1693 to July 1593?

    This is the OP continuing here: Although the timeframe, 1693 to 1493, is an error in interpretation of the first post, it is interesting to speculate upon. It is the Britwankiest of options presented so far, because it provides Britain a two-century advantage instead of a mere one century...
  3. R

    What if the British Isles and England's overseas colonies were ISOT from July 1693 to July 1593?

    Good points on the 1693 to 1593 scenario! Some other points of interest on this scenario - I think William of Orange will want to intervene early and often in the 80 Years War to win independence for Netherlands, in less than 80 years. With John Churchill, maybe he can pull it off, and maybe...
  4. R

    What if the British Isles and England's overseas colonies were ISOT from July 1693 to July 1593?

    So, William and Mary's England, Scotland and Ireland, and the other parts of England's overseas empire, including the 12 Colonies (sans Georgia) on eastern seaboard of North America, Hudson's Bay, Newfoundland settlements, Caribbean possessions including Jamaica, Barbados, St. Kitts and some...
Back
Top