Pretty much in a bind I hate Extremism as a whole. I hate Communist, who ruin their country, I hate Fascist, who ruin a countries unity, I hate Fanatics, as all religions are alright, as long one doesn't try to kill another (one such example is the Modern Terrorist Caliphate's and their Islamic doctrines) and most importantly, I hate people who jump to conclusions. I haven't killed anyone, and pray I don't have to, but, there are two problems with this world. Evil and Good.
We've seen Evil from the likes of Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Genghis Khan, and Oliver Cromwell, each were leaders of their political parties, and each did horrid things. Hitler killed the Jews, Stalin starved his people and slaughtered those who opposed him, Cromwell massacred Catholics just because he could and Genghis Khan returned insults with piles of skulls.
On the other hand, we have the side of Good, Charlemagne, George Washington, General Patton and many others! But do you know what both of these sides did? They killed many innocent people. Not everyone who followed Hitler wanted to enslave europe, not every person who followed Stalin wanted millions to die.
What I'm saying here is, there isn't an 'Evil' political party, more of how it's used, and if it's effective. Fascism is good for a Militarily one ethnicity country, Monarchism is good for a group of people who want an educated and prepared leader, Communism is good for controlling your nation, if food is not a problem, and Democracy is good for those who have too many groups of people for just one man to cater too.
From what has been proven by history, all systems of govt. work. It's simply how competent you are, and how moderate your nation is. Most of the Communist I've met have been critically obese people who want others to do the work while they sit on their ass have food shoveled into their mouths. Thus I hate them. I don't hate all communist, I think that Vietnam's communist party was quite alright, and while yeah, they did torture people, their struggle was legitimate.
When I said to shove them out to see, I'm talking about New Communism, not the Communist that were actually justified. Which, when you actually look at it, was a VERY short list. for instance, China's communist were justified, both Imperial govt and Democratic govt had failed the people spectacularly. However, it became quite apparent that the people in charge under communism didn't know shit either. They were justified, and fought for the people! but when those in power got drunk off said power, and with nothing in line to check them? A once legitimate effort to help the people of China, became another shackle.
Pretty much what I am saying is, a communist nation who doesn't go ape-shit dictator, or try to Industrialize too fast is a decent-able one. Communism is perfect for Agrarianism, not Industrialism. Which is my point of what I said.