What Made You A Conservative?

Trump never accepted David Duke’s endorsement, though even discussing David Duke at all as though his endorsement matters is absurd. On the other hand, Louis Farrakhan is an important mover and shaker in the Democrat Party, that can’t be said about Richard Spencer, David Duke, or any other white nationalist.

U5J2CBGWDPKAVLUUFGSK6GMQRQ.jpg


imrs.php



EamMhXtWAAEQJJD.jpg


Also, the Proud Boys arose because left wing thugs were attacking conservatives when ever they tried to have public events and the police weren’t doing their job, so the PB started protecting innocent people from Antifa. Is that being dumbasses? I think it’s quite admirable.

EDIT:
To put things into perspective, here are some quotes from the guy pictured with two Democrat presidents and a Democrat senator:

“The Jews don’t like Farrakhan, so they call me Hitler. Well, that’s a good name. Hitler was a very great man.”

“White people are potential humans – they haven’t evolved yet.”

“My god will wipe this country (America) from the face of the earth.”

On on the Jewish people: “You are wicked deceivers of the American people. You have sucked their blood.”
 
Last edited:
Trump never accepted David Duke’s endorsement, though even discussing David Duke at all as though his endorsement matters is absurd. On the other hand, Louis Farrakhan is an important mover and shaker in the Democrat Party, that can’t be said about Richard Spencer, David Duke, or any other white nationalist.

Ah, the wonderful fellow who literally called Jews termites.
 
Ah, the wonderful fellow who literally called Jews termites.

To the modern Left, it's quite okay to be anti-Semitic, as long as you are also anti-White.
It's if you are pro-White that they will start shrieking with rage and accusing you of being anti-Semitic, whether you are or not.

In general, it's no surprise that race relations take a nosedive when American Democrats or other people of that mindset are in power, it's direct result of the adversarial way they approach the whole topic.
Their thinking seems to be very zero-sum: what's good for White people can't also be good for Black people, and vice versa.

So instead of competing visions of what would be good for everyone, political discourse gets balkanized into competing special interest groups, each claiming the moral high ground for being openly selfish.
Except for White people, who are expected to all roll over and die, so that the Liberal elite and their non-white puppets can have everything for themselves. Or something.

It's like dealing with someone who wants to break into your house and kill you, and accuses you of wrongdoing if you defend yourself.
 
Right, and we don't have any of the masculine sacred serpent energy you need for a functioning patriarchy. Sorry, I am not going to take critiques from a fascist.
This sight has a pretty clear policy about not calling people Nazis (or a host of other epithets), unless you can prove it or they admit it, under rule 2e:

  • e) Accusations of being or belonging to a political extremist group or holding an extremist ideology, unless the poster self-identifies as such or can be proved to be such, with the accuser having the burden of proving their accusation.

So either retract that, or back it up.
 
@mesonoxian ,

I see a lot of talk from right wingers about "owning the libs" and trolling and I wonder if that is part of the disconnect. Because how the right feels is pretty insignificant to most people on the left. Of course we're human, and a certain amount of vindictiveness happens, especially against people who have done a lot of harm. But trying to hurt the feelings of the average Trump supporter is not something that most people seem to care a whole lot about. It is a much more result and fact oriented discussion most of the time.

Anyhoo, just something I wanted to share. Take it sleazy.

I see the left’s atheism as essentially fueling your inability to engage with people on an emotional level. Scientism has corrupted your minds and left you depressed, nihilistic atheists who don’t understand that human history and human society are things of great passion, or as Turisas put it in the forward to “Rex Regi Rebellis”, History is a beautiful maiden, breathing life into the works of your ancestors. You all want to reduce humanity to a maths problem, and to the right that’s worse than death—it’s the destruction of the soul.
 
I see the left’s atheism as essentially fueling your inability to engage with people on an emotional level. Scientism has corrupted your minds and left you depressed, nihilistic atheists who don’t understand that human history and human society are things of great passion, or as Turisas put it in the forward to “Rex Regi Rebellis”, History is a beautiful maiden, breathing life into the works of your ancestors. You all want to reduce humanity to a maths problem, and to the right that’s worse than death—it’s the destruction of the soul.

Hey, don’t lump all atheists together

I’m not into all that pseudo-intellectual pseudo-science shit that keeps saying Communism or Socialism and all its offshoots or variations and various policies are super-smart regardless of evidence to the contrary and believe in some idealized utopia could be achieved with some mega-plan and going on about christians bad and ignore what’s going on with islam sort of shit

Hell, I doubt those so called “atheists” actually can even understand basic economics let alone even bother to admit that they don’t actually know history in-detail
 
Last edited:
If someone can breed like rabbits than they can multiply as insects and be even more stubborn as a cockroach surviving against all kinds of adversity.
Da fuck are you even on about? Calling a group of people insects, especially an ethnic group, can't be interpreted as anything but a derogatory term. And termites is even worse, since termites are a foreign body that destroys wood, the thing most furniture and many houses are made of. A clear parallel to eating into the foundations of society. So calling Jews insects (small, insignificant, disgusting creatures that can be killed at whim without any ethical dilemma) AND saying they are a fifth column that is destroying society. There can be no benign interpretation to Farrakan's words, period.

Now stop wasting everybody's time with your weird-ass arguments.
 
Da fuck are you even on about? Calling a group of people insects, especially an ethnic group, can't be interpreted as anything but a derogatory term. And termites is even worse, since termites are a foreign body that destroys wood, the thing most furniture and many houses are made of. A clear parallel to eating into the foundations of society. So calling Jews insects (small, insignificant, disgusting creatures that can be killed at whim without any ethical dilemma) AND saying they are a fifth column that is destroying society. There can be no benign interpretation to Farrakan's words, period.

Now stop wasting everybody's time with your weird-ass arguments.
I'm not using Farrakan's words. That's his own beliefs. Mine is different. I take an aspect of the biological advantages of an insect and relate it to people as a compliment not an insult.
 
If someone can breed like rabbits than they can multiply as insects and be even more stubborn as a cockroach surviving against all kinds of adversity.

Neither Jews nor any other sort of people can breed like rabbits. A female rabbit becomes able to have its first batch of offspring at an age of six months, and then another batch every month. Do the maths, and you can see the problem.


Some Jewish subcultures do tend towards large families, but they are by no means unique in that. And it doesn't make them rabbits.
 
Neither Jews nor any other sort of people can breed like rabbits. A female rabbit becomes able to have its first batch of offspring at an age of six months, and then another batch every month. Do the maths, and you can see the problem.


Some Jewish subcultures do tend towards large families, but they are by no means unique in that. And it doesn't make them rabbits.
They clearly can't biologically?

It's a form of expression. Is it dehumanising if I get called a grasshopper or an ant? I can agree to both when I think of myself at times acting like an ant or being more like a noob so I can get called a grasshopper.

Though I can't envision Jews as termites from Farrakan's words. Certain people perhaps who do acts of corruption do fit.
 
They clearly can't biologically?

It's a form of expression. Is it dehumanising if I get called a grasshopper or an ant? I can agree to both when I think of myself at times acting like an ant or being more like a noob so I can get called a grasshopper.

I keep thinking that’s something from Karate Kid
 
Can we move on from this retarded, braindead derail? Calling people "insects" is universally bad. If someone has some weird personal definitions that are different from the rest of humanity, just keep them to yourself.
 
I keep thinking that’s something from Karate Kid
And I just found out grasshoppers are related to locusts too. Pests who enjoy eating all the plants too. Young apprentices have a mighty appetite?
Can we move on from this retarded, braindead derail? Calling people "insects" is universally bad. If someone has some weird personal definitions that are different from the rest of humanity, just keep them to yourself.
I keep it to the forum. Sorry you feel that way even if you're justified when real racists love to compare people they hate to animals even if said animals have interesting traits with a function towards the food chain deemed a positive.

Termites do have a net benefit after all for the ecosystem.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top