I mean, given how you posted that screed about the purpose of human existence being to kill each other ... why should you view that as a bad thing by the lights of your deranged political philosophy? If the important thing is that the blood flows and the bodies stack up, that man exterminate himself ... why not let it happen all the more, in your twisted world view?
Hmm, speaking of twisted world views ... he may be more twisted than I thought! I mean, everything he's said can be easily put together to reconstruct a certain ideology the advocacy of which is forbidden on this forum. Before we begin, let it be said that having been on the receiving end of being called a crypto-fascist multiple times I would
never make such an accusation lightly.
Translation from Solaris-ese to English: I'm willing to throw out all my supposed ideological preconceptions to glorify a faction who epitomise Nietzschean anti-Christian triumph of the will shenanigans. Because I only really care about Christianity, throne-and-altar, garden-variety reactionaryism et al as a crutch and disguise for my real beliefs.
If you must know, I view all forms of corvee labour, including the chattel slavery practiced in the antebellum South to be a morally neutral question of the prudential order.
'Eugenics' is literally just Aristocratic concern for good breeding and mate selection.
In contrast to the church's moral teaching, I view slavery as a good thing if you can get away with it, tick. I also do the same for eugenics (tick), because the church's clear teaching on that matter doesn't count for me because reasons. So when I invoke the church's teaching as a gotcha card when my views are challenged, you can easily tell I'm just doing it to try and end the argument.
The German tribal volkswanderung conquered from Alexandria in Aegypt to Carthage, to Rome, to Seville, West and East Frankia, and into the lands of the Kievan Russ. Goths, Franks, Lombards, Vandals, Angles, Jutes, Saxons, all Germans, and all founding stock of nearly every nation within Christendom
the Hidalgos are themselves Visigoths who took Hispania through might and main.
Fighting inside the family when our enemies bay for our blood is contra-indicated.
"RAH RAH MUH GLORIOUS BARBARIAN CONQUERING ARYAN GERMANIC TRIBES RAH RAH", tick. Also, politics and history seen solely as race warfare, tick.
Its not what I would have done, but I am not the one who was there, and refuse to judge the men who were, seeing as they are my ancestors and brothers in Christ.
To disparage the German contribution to Christendom is to attack the racial and cultural base thereof.
But 'whiteness', at least, as I understand and use the term, is more than culture, more than cult, it is a bloodline.
False, but I've already covered that above. Further reading.
The Germanization of Christianity.
The Gospel of the Saxons.
Its not what I would have done, but I am not the one who was there, and refuse to judge the men who were, seeing as they are my ancestors and brothers in Christ.
Translation from Solaris-ese to English: I support "Christendom" if by Christendom you mean "the white race". Doctrinal and organisational differences pale in comparison to this solitary factor.
Only "Aryans" can truly be Christians. Tick.
The 'individual' has nothing that is his own, .... his soul.
False. Nations and Peoples do have immortal souls. They're called Angels.
"Because I know openly spouting my racially mysticist views about collective racial souls (tick) would shatter the disguise that I'm just a really devout Catholic (despite the fact I have no problem claiming that the last three Popes have been illegitimate) I cover them in a thin coating of baptismal water."
DocSolarisReich said:
Yes, power politics. What do you think monarchy actually is?
"Find in any country the Ablest Man that exists there; raise him to the supreme place, and loyally reverence him: you have a perfect government for that country; no ballot-box, parliamentary eloquence, voting, constitution-building, or other machinery whatsoever can improve it a whit." ~ Thomas Carlyle.
Whenever you hear me opining about "monarchy" read "totalitarian dictatorship" and when I say the word "king" hear "Leader". This is because I'm not actually a traditionalist or a reactionary, but a modern-day totalitarian. Tick.
The last time anyone in France had the stomach to actually do anything against the disintegration of France was in 1961, and
non je ne regret rien.
Disagree. Peaceful change of power is highly overrated ... who exactly needs to die.
DocSolarisReich said:
"Kill them all, God will know his own" in Latin as sig
I tried the IRL organizing thing ... Turns out dissident politics isn’t any good for your career ...
Sedition and rebellion are a young man’s game.
Translation from Solaris-ese to English - I'm obsessed with the supposed power of violence as a "pure" method of resolving disputes even when it's ineffectual or counterproductive. I'm a coward though, so I'll never stick my own neck out on the line. Tick.
I don't really claim an 'economic theory'. I guess Third Position if you held a gun to my head. The important thing is ordering the political-economy to the common good and the final end of man.
I support the literal economic position of neo-fascism and neo-Nazism. Tick.
See this is the problem with the farce of Nurenburg, it destroys centuries of legal tradition in the name of liberalism.
“That’s why We have invited Herr Doctor William Joseph von Steuben-Bayer of
IG Farben to address this council today
Translation from Solaris-ese to English: I think the folks who were found guilty at Nuremberg ought to have gotten off, and I have no problem with going out of my way to present their co-conspirators in genocide as heroic allies of the protagonists (who always win easily, and are always right and never wrong) in my works of fiction. Tick, tick.
If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and sympathises with ducks to the point of writing them as heroes... what is it?
You thought you were smart, weren't you,
@DocSolarisReich (and isn't that username itself mighty odd for someone not of German origin?), putting all the pieces of your
real ideological position out like sections of a jigsaw without connecting them together and while camouflaging them with all that traditionalist/reactionary guff? I had thought you were a coward, but perhaps this is a better explanation for your consistent refusal to defend your positions when they were subjected to in-depth rebuttal. Because otherwise you would have to make an admission you knew would get you thrown off of the board like the trash you are. No wonder your last reply to me was pathetic bitching about being "misrepresented" followed by a failure to correct said "misrepresentation" when I publicly challenged you to do so.
But still, you're far less clever than you think you are, because you didn't realise that by putting the pieces of your ideology out in the open at all you left them right out there for those dumb degenerate "right-liberals" to connect. Go sell your trash ideology (which never achieved anything more than killing millions, destroying the country that tried to implement it, and giving leftists an easy slur to call their opponents) on /pol/, Stormfront or Iron March. There you can do it without bothering to disguise it, which I think would be less of a burden for you than doing it on here. Or you could be a real man and start preaching your beliefs at church after the service, at work, and to your D&D group instead of on a place where no-one knows you aren't a dog.