strunkenwhite
Well-known member
What do you owe a lord who refuses—not just fails but declines—to lift a hand or say a word to protect you from the abuses of his other subjects?
The Right and White Nationalism - An annoying cancer
- Thread starter Bacle
- Start date
Lord Sovereign
The resident Britbong
As a Brit, I'm not the biggest fan of the American Revolution, but even I understand it was more complicated than "Crown good, Colonials bad." Then again, the same goes for "Colonials good, Crown bad."
AnimalNoodles
Well-known member
The same people who will wax poetic over the emirate of cordoba, a literal muslim supremacist, colonialist, imperialist slave state
Yes.Idiots think that they could use muslims to destroy what is left of our cyvilisation,and then those muslims would obey them.Fools.If they succed,they would literelly lost their heads.
Idea as good as welcoming saxon mercaneries to Britain by Vortigern,becouse his british subject do not liked him.
Result? we have England now,and remnants of british people are unimportant minority.
Cromwell was a monster and arguably without his..politics..there'd be no Deconstructvists in the French revolution and without them no communism. So not the best argument to make...However
Trying to stick thirteen colonies with a war debt they incurred only because your predecessors ignored them and let Indians and Frogs rape them and murder them is... I would argue a quintessential failure of Kingly virtues enough to render any oath to the Crown moot.
The Plantagenet's were likewise derelict and its a miracle they survived passed Empress Thot and her dipshit brother.
Navarro
Well-known member
You sure you wanna play that game?
Catechism of the Catholic Church
Search or browse the Catechism of the Catholic Church. An excellent tool for learning more about the Faith and for research.
www.catholicculture.org
Joseph Rummel - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Oh, lookie, we can see an Archbishop teaching what you'd said was heresy and gnosticism! Either you don't know the teachings of the religion you claim to follow, you're lying about them, or you're actually following a different religion and lying about it (well, you do simultaneously call yourself an ultramontanist and then from the other side of your mouth say that the Pope and the Catholic hierarchy are so corrupt and evil they don't have any authority over you, so your honesty is rather in doubt).
Back in the day they also excommunicated folks who said milder things than you do:
You wouldn't be a "pillar" of your parish if they knew what you say over here (unless you're part of some schismatic splinter-group of the Catholic Church, which is entirely possible).
This is either pig-headedly ignorant or an out-right, bald-faced lie:
Phyletism - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Of course, you're directly guilty of this by Orthodox standards as you associate Christianity and Christendom completely with "MUH GLORIOUS ALL-CONQUERING ARYAN GERMANICS" to the point you say that they were the real originators of the Catholic Church (setting it up as a "folk religion", that's a very interesting term when spelled with a "v") and pagan blonde-haired blue-eyed Vikings sacrificing a bishop to Odin are part of "Christendom" where dutifully churchgoing dark-skinned and dark-haired Ethiopians aren't (one must note again that this was not the actual medieval worldview; in the early 1400s the Kingdom of Aragon had no inherent qualms about setting up a marriage alliance with the Empire of Ethiopia).
But then again your only qualifier for counting Protestant Confederates as "brothers in Christ" is "they thought slavery was kewl just like I do" so you really do have no real religious convictions. Only convictions about race and your own superiority masquerading as them.
You've also since abandoned your previous "Touch not the Lord's Anointed!" stance, for your real position: "lol, kill the king if you don't like him and you can get away with it, who cares?". So dissimulation is a consistent part of your rhetorical strategy (only you're really stupid about doing it so you act as if every time you post it was the first time ever). Either that or you're legally insane.
The Catholic Church disagrees:
Casti connubii - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
In fact, Catholics at the time eugenics was really really openly popular (among leftists and progressives, of whom you are one even as you call yourself the only real right-winger on these forums) were among its most fervent critics. If you've read enough Chesterton to get to his critique of Carthage as an "over-civilised" society, you've read enough to know that he, to be mild, disapproved of eugenics and the "race theories" that were all the rage at the time. So did Tolkien, so you can stop pretending to like him now.
(As a consolation, you can continue to view a culture of Nietzschean will-to-power transhumanists who respect no law or religion, delight in torturing their enemies, genetically engineer their slaves to worship them and engage in wanton and rampant sexual immorality and rape as a good template for society. Because surely Jesus and the church say that's ideal.)
When you die, do you expect the colour of your skin or your genetic makeup to matter? Oh, you probably literally do, my apologies for the rhetorical question. Either that or you believe you have a super-special "white soul" or even "Anglo soul". Both ideas are retarded, deemed heretical by the vast majority of Christian denominations, and have more to do with gnosticism than anything you excoriate.
Maybe if people from all sorts of Christian denominations are all trying to explain this idea to you, they're the ones who're right and you're the one who's wrong. But you'll never consider that, just as you've never considered that other people can skim Wikipedia and do Google searches, and don't have a lower memory span than a goldfish. Because you plainly have an obsession with your own perceived personal superiority over all of us and indeed over all mankind.
I mean, your whole definition of "monarchy" is "one man is free, all the others are little more than slaves to him", as the only form of government that doesn't degenerate into the evil modern world. And you see yourself as the "king" of this utopia, as you've made clear, with the right to inflict whatsoever tortures you please on whosoever offends you (God, the horrors your wife and kids must be going through. I am praying for them right now). The literal whole emotional root of your ideology (which I've defined in a previous post) is one massive sustained temper tantrum that other people with different wills to you exist and your need to destroy this evil world that doesn't bend to your whims, or to see it destroyed (rather like Tolkien's portrayal of Satan).
This would have a shred of validity if:
A: The sin of Babel had been "miscegenation" and not human pride.
B: the foundation of the Church at Pentecost hadn't been the literal reversal of the judgement at Babel.
You literally say "sola scriptura is heretical" and then reject the Catholic church's interpretation of the Bible for your own idiosyncratic one that just so happens to line up with your obsessions. That's brazen as all Hell.
EDIT: Lol. No reply. Cowardice on display yet again. Refuses to stand up for his self-proclaimed principles like a man.
Last edited:
Lol Christians aren't going anywhere dude. They're getting stronger.
Last edited:
I can only pray that they will see reason and return to the Catholic Church. These hateful SJW-religions will lead to ruin.
almostinsane
Well-known member
The Catholic Church needs another Pope Pius X.
As an atheist, I think Christianity is great if it prevents people turning their politics into religion.
And I far prefer Christianity over the others, because while I don't agree with all their moral standards, it's probably the closest to my own of all the religions. Probably because my own moral foundation absolutely has it's roots in Christianity, because that's one of the foundations of our nation and our system of laws.
Also in general most Christians I meet are more pleasant than edgelord atheists
And I far prefer Christianity over the others, because while I don't agree with all their moral standards, it's probably the closest to my own of all the religions. Probably because my own moral foundation absolutely has it's roots in Christianity, because that's one of the foundations of our nation and our system of laws.
Also in general most Christians I meet are more pleasant than edgelord atheists
Navarro
Well-known member
Problem with that play is that removing said foundation ... leaves the whole idea of natural rights hanging in the air unsupported. If man is just another animal, you can do whatsoever you please to him. Literally nothing is forbidden.
Catholic church needs a new Pope Leo. Or that War Pope who said he'd raise an army in hell and storm the gates of Saint Peter and arrest the old boy for heresy if he was denied entrance into paradise.
Hilariously the fate of the Church might be in the hands of two based Africans.
One who tried to order an inquisition against his own ancestral tribe for heresy no less. And has expressed interest in trying to depose the communist in white
DocSolarisReich
Esoteric Spaceman
We will know that day is come when the documents of the robber council are burned on a pyre in Saint Peter's square while Dies Irae is chanted by tonsured monks with full orchestral accompaniment.
Lord Sovereign
The resident Britbong
DocSolarisReich
Esoteric Spaceman
I will happily setup a shrine to King Saint Wotan if it will make peace in my family.
Navarro
Well-known member
Look, this is literally the worst possible time to try and make a big show of your supposedly vitally important Catholic faith given how I've shown your alleged piety to literally be nothing but a pile of lies, dissimulations and distortions to the point that you literally end up calling yourself a heretic by your own definition of such.
But then you've always thought you're far smarter than you are and that other people don't have the intelligence to stick your statements together, or to remember what you'd just said yesterday that was 180 degrees in opposition to what you said today.
Nordic neopaganism would actually be a far more honest religion for him to follow. It has a lot more in common with what he actually believes and his rampant Nietzscheanism.
No such saint exists in Catholicism. The closest result I got was an anime character. Please stop humiliating yourself.
So I guess you're fine with literal pagan syncretism then. So that clears up the worries you were having about the "Kali Yuga", you were literally scared of Kalki from Hindu mythology and not some abstract technological dystopia.
You just keep digging this hole deeper and deeper for yourself, don't you?
EDIT:
Oh, and you literally can't tell when people are mocking you and your idiotic ideas, even putting the "/s" sign to signpost it in their messages. I am amazingly still surprised that your stupidity knows no bounds.
Behind all the big words whose meanings you don't understand and the thinkers you boil down to a level below lowest common denominator we have a practically brain-dead individual who doesn't know when he's being mocked, doesn't know people can read his old posts, and doesn't know other people can look up Google and Wikipedia. And is too cowardly on the intellectual level to offer any kind of counter-argument when people issue rebuttals against his claims.
Behold, the self-proclaimed rightful man to be ruler of the world!
You do know that you are practically a pariah on this forum, and even your supposed co-religionists dislike you and hate your political ideology? But if you could understand things like that ... you wouldn't be you.
Last edited:
We need it.Problem is - our Church fall to leftist.As last anchor which was left,but still fall.Now,only miracle would save us.
i just read book about Holy Mary in Trevignano Romano,and apparently our time is ending.
DocSolarisReich
Esoteric Spaceman
Not entirelly,those guys were simply corrupted,not marxist.Althought...Saint Damiani wrote book against sodomite mafia in church about 1050 AD.