Again, there is context to everything.
You assume there is none.
The impression I consistently get from you is that you've got no idea what "context" there might be either, except maybe in a vague generality that could mean pretty much anything. You were just told at some point that there
was context, and you trust this because you are far too personally invested emotionally in the military and intelligence community. Or maybe you didn't even have to be told there was context, you just assumed there was for the same reason.
Like, let's go back to this
@Zachowon are you able to define 'innocents' for us here?
Those not in bed with foreign anything.
That is not the definition of innocent no matter what definition of "in bed with" you use (and you're being ambiguous again about what you could mean here). Someone is innocent if they have not committed a crime.
One of the concerns with what was revealed with Snowden was that deep state spooks had taken to using any connection, no matter how minor, with any non-American as a pretext and excuse for surveillance. With that in mind, your definition here is suspect.