Crom's Black Blade
Well-known member
It strikes me as an argument of needlessly bad faith to assume negative connotations on someone for merely being more knowledgeable on a subject than one's self. Further it doesn't really address the argument.but you fail, somebody who is into shit is not the same as someone who is aware of the existence of a septic pit close by.
You alleged Picard, Discovery, presumably Prodigies and possibly, since they are certainly as dumb as the rest of NuTrek, even the Rebooted Trek movies are obscure. So obscure it is unrealistic to expect the participants of a Sci-Fi versus forum to remotely be aware of its existence. That to be aware of it requires for you to be obsessed with Trek .Which you seem to use in a pejorative sense rather than purely as a descriptor.
You are clearly aware of Picard/Discovery and, per your statements, have seen more of it than I have since the last NuTrek I watched was the 2009's reboot. In light of the above I find it incredulous that NuTrek is obscure to you.
More broadly my question was not to insult you, after all I would hardly consider being obsessed with Trek a pejorative, but rather to highlight a flawed line of reasoning on your part. That rather than "obscure" it would likely be accurate to say a show like Picard is "unpopular" and thus few are particularly interested in the universe it depicts. Ironically Star Trek Online would likely be more accurately described as "obscure" yet it is not, to my knowledge, nearly as bad as "Bad Robot" again indicating that "quality" and "general awareness" are not necessary synonyms.