United States U.S. DEI crap worse than Hamas missiles and being next door to the mess in Ukraine, chipmakers think.

Agent23

Ни шагу назад!
As you can see when @Marduk has to choose between the US getting it's shit together and America continuing to suck EU dick, he fucks over Americans in a heartbeat like the good little eurocuck he is.
He does not like the EU, he basically wants a new PLC controlling most of European Russia and Ukraine and probably a decent chunk of the Balkans, fo him NATO and the EU are at most tools to beat Russia with IMHO.

Guy is kinds high on a modernized version of what the Poles call prometheanism IMHO.

So, basically a US-philiac Polish nationalist of the louder and more obnoxious variety, probably the offshoot of some long gone midling aristocrat family, too, given how vocally he fanboys their Golden "Freedom" and Magnates.

If you replace a few names, say Russia and USA, and Poland and Bulgaria, he would be considered a milktoast centrist leaning sloghtu to the roght by the Bulgarian Right.

Same goes for most other rightwing/nationalist groups within Eastern Europe.

And even among some rightwing poles I have seen on telegram he is actually a lot less loud and autistic, and americaphilia, by comparison.

And I haven't seen him hate on Jews, either, so he would likely be kicked out of Federstzia. :ROFLMAO:
 

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
problem: I'm not sure our foreign policy isn't run by retards...I mean, look at it's current status.
If you think they are bad, look at the fringe of the same party who think they aren't nearly retarded enough... Complete with also wanting to throw away multi-decade old alliances to favor some crazy shithole that won't like them in return anyway.
He does not like the EU, he basically wants a new PLC controlling most of European Russia and Ukraine and probably a decent chunk of the Balkans, fo him NATO and the EU are at most tools to beat Russia with IMHO.

Guy is kinds high on a modernized version of what the Poles call prometheanism IMHO.

So, basically a US-philiac Polish nationalist of the louder and more obnoxious variety, probably the offshoot of some long gone midling aristocrat family, too, given how vocally he fanboys their Golden "Freedom" and Magnates.

If you replace a few names, say Russia and USA, and Poland and Bulgaria, he would be considered a milktoast centrist leaning sloghtu to the roght by the Bulgarian Right.
How nice that i'm getting my own political fanfiction on TS.
 

The One Char

Well-known member
Fuck off, treacherous whore. USA is lucky retards like you are not in charge of foreign policy.
I'm gonna quote @mrttao to explain what I consider a threat to america.

I am? because you clearly replied to this post

with the argument that "people said the same thing about the japs" and then WW2 happened

Which is a clear contradiction of what I said. And what I said is clearly that there are so many bigger threats than putin.

Roughly in order (but not exactly)
CIA, FBI, ATF, IRS, NSA, WEF, tech cartels (especially google), oligarchs, Soros, Gates, obama, woke cult, entire Demonrat party, 90% of RINOcuck party,USA communists, teachers union, K12 education, liberal inquisition in universities, child groomers, ADL (antisemite development league), USPS union, trans trenders, feminism, LGBTQP, banks, mexican drug cartels entering the USA, mass migration, child traffickers, and many more are existential threats inside the USA that take vastly higher priority than putin.

then outside the USA the biggest threats in exact order are:
1. EU
2. Cadana (totalitarian commie country with near parity that shares a border. very close ties to CCP)
3. UK (soon to be a muslim state with nukes)
4. france (soon to be a muslim state with nukes)...
5. australia (communists part of the globalist alliance. armed with modern USA weaponry. mass importing CCP citizens)
6. china
7. maybe russia. possibly I forgot a few bigger threats that rank above it. Putin himself ranks 1 spot below russia since russia might possibly flourish after he passes of old age.

Putin is so far down the list of threats it is not even funny.
Putin dreams of world domination, same as 99% of all govt officials and oligarchs.
But he has less than one in a million chance of ever threatening the USA before he dies of old age and Russia fractures.

him being a bone stuck in the throats of the WEF globalists is potentially even to our favor. As they spend their resources fighting him instead of oppressing us.
Although it might potentially not be, as it also seems to have sent a bunch of neocons into a tizzy and made them turn on those who would be their allies against the real threats which I listed above.
He does not like the EU, he basically wants a new PLC controlling most of European Russia and Ukraine and probably a decent chunk of the Balkans, fo him NATO and the EU are at most tools to beat Russia with IMHO.

Guy is kinds high on a modernized version of what the Poles call prometheanism IMHO.

So, basically a US-philiac Polish nationalist of the louder and more obnoxious variety, probably the offshoot of some long gone midling aristocrat family, too, given how vocally he fanboys their Golden "Freedom" and Magnates.

If you replace a few names, say Russia and USA, and Poland and Bulgaria, he would be considered a milktoast centrist leaning sloghtu to the roght by the Bulgarian Right.
Really? Because he certainly screams "NO! You can't do that!" like a eurocuck when people in America try to do thins like bring manufacturing back and not let Europe use us cumrag/attack dog.
 

Agent23

Ни шагу назад!
If you think they are bad, look at the fringe of the same party who think they aren't nearly retarded enough... Complete with also wanting to throw away multi-decade old alliances to favor some crazy shithole that won't like them in return anyway.

How nice that i'm getting my own political fanfiction on TS.
You are the guy that defended your serfdom practices in Ukraine and your broken, oligarchical Magnate system dude.

And don't bitch, I am merkly pointing out that where the right in Eastern Europe as a whole is concerned you are actually quite pro American and not that hard right.

You can thank me for defending you some other time I guess. :(
 

The One Char

Well-known member
You are the guy that defended your serfdom practices in Ukraine and your broken, oligarchical Magnate system dude.

And don't bitch, I am merkly pointing out that where the right in Eastern Europe as a whole is concerned you are actually quite pro American and not that hard right.

You can thank me for defending you some other time I guess. :(
To be fair, I understand why Poles like him hate and fear their historical regional enemy Russia. But that's the problem, regional enemy. America frankly has bigger fish to fry.
 

Agent23

Ни шагу назад!
Really? Because he certainly screams "NO! You can't do that!" like a eurocuck when people in America try to do thins like bring manufacturing back and not let Europe use us cumrag/attack dog.
You are not bringing manufacturing back, you are trying to steal manufacturing from the EU, and succeeding.

This little war your state department cooked up with the aid of our dumb fuck Eurocratd like Ursula and stupid Greens, coupled with the Biden money printing, basically fucked over everyone from BASF to MIELE.

The situation between the USA and the EU can be summed up in the former telling the latter that you should die today so I can live a few weeks longer.

Meanwhile, China is doing quite well out of it all.

And for the record,Biden's money printing and fucking us over where energy is concerned will not restore US industry, because a lot of those companies will move to China or other East Asian countries that still have high growth, a well educated populario and have not fallen to wokeness or the green bullshit or the latest bout of virtue signalling related to Ukraine.

Murikha is a bleeding empire, I would rather see it purge itself of wokeness and the leftoid agendas and turn itself into a concrete conservative country from a liberal propositional wannabe empire, and that way it can also serve as an example to others what to do.

Your current trajectory though, is turning you into a dangerous example what NOT TO DO, and at the same time one thet wants to force those types of choices on the rest of the world, much like the USSR, time you go back to being a Republic!
 

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
You are the guy that defended your serfdom practices in Ukraine and your broken, oligarchical Magnate system dude.
You were the guy who attacked them to excuse historical Russian aggression, while Russian ones definitely were worse, and so i had to defend them in that relation, so don't pull this out of context shit on me.
And don't bitch, I am merkly pointing out that where the right in Eastern Europe as a whole is concerned you are actually quite pro American and not that hard right.

You can thank me for defending you some other time I guess. :(
With those odd fringes you never know is being more hard right or less hard right is a good thing or a bad thing in their eyes.
to be fair, I understand why Poles like hate and fear their historical regional enemy Russia. But that's the problem, regional enemy. America frankly has bigger fish to fry.
America disagrees.
Russia earned the honorable spot as one of 6 officially recognized foreign adversaries by US government, and US public according to polling also agrees about this more than most other things.
I'm gonna quote @mrttao to explain what I consider a threat to america.
If you thought that stating out that you subscribe to his steak of conspiracy memes masquerading as good foreign policy analysis is going to make you look more reasonable and convincing, you made a huge mistake.
 

Agent23

Ни шагу назад!
You were the guy who attacked them to excuse historical Russian aggression, while Russian ones definitely were worse, and so i had to defend them in that relation, so don't pull this out of context shit on me.

With those odd fringes you never know is being more hard right or less hard right is a good thing or a bad thing in their eyes.
Serfdom is serfdom.
Yo ars still attached to a piece of land and can not do much of anything if your feudal lord doesn't let you or decides to sell the land.

And many of the cossacks were exactly such runaway serfs.

All I am saying is that Hmelnitsk dis not happen for no reason and you should accept that.

Furthermore, the Russians managed to build a working form of what is referred to as a service aristocracy that was effective at fending off threats and expanding the borders of the country.

Contrast this with the polish Barons, who from a military caste that was supposed to work under the king and defend the land turned into little more than greedy, fat rent seekers that actively sabotaged the efforts of Polish kings to centealize power and strengthen your nation in the face of coming threats, that is why the whole Potop happened.

You are not right all the time, you need to learn that and stop doubling down!
 

The One Char

Well-known member
You were the guy who attacked them to excuse historical Russian aggression, while Russian ones definitely were worse, and so i had to defend them in that relation, so don't pull this out of context shit on me.

With those odd fringes you never know is being more hard right or less hard right is a good thing or a bad thing in their eyes.

America disagrees.
Russia earned the honorable spot as one of 6 officially recognized foreign adversaries by US government, and US public according to polling also agrees about this more than most other things.

If you thought that stating out that you subscribe to his steak of conspiracy memes masquerading as good foreign policy analysis is going to make you look more reasonable and convincing, you made a huge mistake.
Why are you a mod on this forum when you call this:
Roughly in order (but not exactly)
CIA, FBI, ATF, IRS, NSA, WEF, tech cartels (especially google), oligarchs, Soros, Gates, obama, woke cult, entire Demonrat party, 90% of RINOcuck party,USA communists, teachers union, K12 education, liberal inquisition in universities, child groomers, ADL (antisemite development league), USPS union, trans trenders, feminism, LGBTQP, banks, mexican drug cartels entering the USA, mass migration, child traffickers, and many more are existential threats inside the USA that take vastly higher priority than putin.
conspiracy memes?
 

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
Serfdom is serfdom.
Yo ars still attached to a piece of land and can not do much of anything if your feudal lord doesn't let you or decides to sell the land.

And many of the cossacks were exactly such runaway serfs.

All I am saying is that Hmelnitsk dis not happen for no reason and you should accept that.

Furthermore, the Russians managed to build a working form of what is referred to as a service aristocracy that was effective at fending off threats and expanding the borders of the country.

Contrast this with the polish Barons, who from a military caste that was supposed to work under the king and defend the land turned into little more than greedy, fat rent seekers that actively sabotaged the efforts of Polish kings to centealize power and strengthen your nation in the face of coming threats, that is why the whole Potop happened.

You are not right all the time, you need to learn that and stop doubling down!
Yes, yes, Russia was more effective in creating STRONK!!! government.
But hilariously enough, that argument, even if i agree with it, is inconsistent with turning around and shitting on PLC for its serfdom and decentralized power.
The stronk centralized government in turn meant its serfs (serfdom was not exactly the same thing in different times and places, so no to "serfdom is serfdom") were treated so badly they even ran away to be serfs elsewhere, including in PLC.
In turn the stronk and centralized government took almost a century more to start lifting serfdom than the evil magnate land with decentralized power (started with Constitution of 3rd of May), so if you want to shit on PLC for serfdom of all things, the same points apply better to some other European states of the same age.
Peasants chose to escape if they felt that they had little to lose; or suffered from heavy taxation and exploitation, theft and hunger; or wanted avoid military conscription or religious persecution.[2][4][3] Peasants usually ran away to neighbouring provinces, and less often, to foreign countries.[2][4] However, significant differences between serfdom regimes in various countries could encourage international flight. In the 18th century the Russian serfs were escaping from Russia to the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth (where previously harsh conditions were improving) in significant enough numbers to become a major concern for the Russian Government sufficient to play a role in its decision to partition the Commonwealth.[13][14][15]
As the situation of Polish serfs improved, it actually caused a problem in the Polish–Russian relations. Russian peasants were escaping from the Russian Empire to the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth in significant enough numbers to become a major concern for the Tsardom of Russia. Increasingly in the 18th century, Russian armies raided territories of the Commonwealth, officially to recover the escapees, but in fact kidnapping many locals.[10] Describing the system as it existed by the end of the century, Wagner writes: "The situation of the peasants in Poland was better than in most other countries. In France and Germany, for example, the owners of landed estates had unlimited jurisdiction over them, including the power to punish by death. In Russia, their economic oppression was notorious, and one of the reasons Catherine II gave for the partition of Poland was the fact that thousands of peasants escaped from Russia to Poland to seek a better fate."[11] Piotr Kimla noted that the Russian government spread international propaganda, mainly in France, which falsely exaggerated serfdom conditions in Poland, while ignoring worse conditions in Russia, as one of the justification for the partitions.[12]

Polish government reforms aiming at improving the situation of the peasantry reached culmination with the Constitution of 3 May 1791, which declared that the government would protect the peasantry, and encourage the use of contracts between peasants and their lords. Any further reforms were made impossible by the partitions of Poland and the resulting disappearance of the Polish state.[12][13]
Why are you a mod on this forum when you call this:

conspiracy memes?
Because apparently you have no idea that the right, both in US and internationally, is a big camp of sometimes varied and conflicting views, and we are not obliged to agree with the most fringe opinions we see, including completely out of whack memeworthy scaling of existential threats to a state, some of these points of the list are not equal to others, some are outright jokes (which is also criticism worthy, but calling a joke an existential threat makes you a joke too) rather than "existential threats" like he described them, so to answer the question, i'm a mod because i don't subscribe to such hysterics.
 
Last edited:

The One Char

Well-known member
Yes, yes, Russia was more effective in creating STRONK!!! government.
But hilariously enough, that argument, even if i agree with it, is inconsistent with turning around and shitting on PLC for its serfdom and decentralized power.
The stronk centralized government in turn meant its serfs (serfdom was not exactly the same thing in different times and places, so no to "serfdom is serfdom") were treated so badly they even ran away to be serfs elsewhere, including in PLC.
In turn the stronk and centralized government took almost a century more to start lifting serfdom than the evil magnate land with decentralized power (started with Constitution of 3rd of May), so if you want to shit on PLC for serfdom of all things, the same points apply better to some other European states of the same age.

Because apparently you have no idea that the right, both in US and internationally, is a big camp of sometimes varied and conflicting views, and we are not obliged to agree with the most fringe opinions we see, including completely out of whack memeworthy scaling of existential threats to a state, some of these points of the list are not equal to others, some are outright jokes (which is also criticism worthy, but calling a joke an existential threat makes you a joke too) rather than "existential threats" like he described them, so to answer the question, i'm a mod because i don't subscribe to such hysterics.
Dude, this is America, The State is the threat.
 

mrttao

Well-known member
Because apparently you have no idea that the right, both in US and internationally, is a big camp of sometimes varied and conflicting views, and we are not obliged to agree with the most fringe opinions we see
> Fringe opinion

It really isn't.
Those are facts, and they are in no way fringe.

Your insistence on suddenly sucking CNN cock and insisting that these are all just conspiracy theories is appalling.
 

Agent23

Ни шагу назад!
Yes, yes, Russia was more effective in creating STRONK!!! government.
But hilariously enough, that argument, even if i agree with it, is inconsistent with turning around and shitting on PLC for its serfdom and decentralized power.
The stronk centralized government in turn meant its serfs (serfdom was not exactly the same thing in different times and places, so no to "serfdom is serfdom") were treated so badly they even ran away to be serfs elsewhere, including in PLC.
In turn the stronk and centralized government took almost a century more to start lifting serfdom than the evil magnate land with decentralized power (started with Constitution of 3rd of May), so if you want to shit on PLC for serfdom of all things, the same points apply better to some other European states of the same age.

Yeah, sure, ok, your source is Wikipedia and the editor might as well be the infamous bored Polish housewife.

Serfs ran away from both Poland and Russia to become cossacks and later willingly worked for the Tzar or Hmelnitski.

And your good buddies the Lithuanians were rether eager to forcibly converted or mistreat orthodox people.

If life under you guys was that good you wouldn't have had the Potop or Hmelnitski and his bloody programs.
 

Marduk

Well-known member
Moderator
Staff Member
> Fringe opinion

It really isn't.
Those are facts, and they are in no way fringe.

Your insistence on suddenly sucking CNN cock and insisting that these are all just conspiracy theories is appalling.
Half of these are minor bullshit not "existential threats", your insistence this opinion isn't fringe or constitutes sucking CNN cock means you are mentally stuck at 14 and your political understanding is stuck on the level of shitposting on chans or twitter, other people have zero obligation to entertain your hysterics and treat them seriously.

Yeah, sure, ok, your source is Wikipedia and the editor might as well be the infamous bored Polish housewife.
Yes, i know, EN wikipedia is not Russian historiography, neither is Polish, but i see no reason why i should care, Russian one is shamelessly self-serving even by the standard of average national historiography, to the point of having to disagree with the rest of the world on basic facts like when WW2 started.
Serfs ran away from both Poland and Russia to become cossacks and later willingly worked for the Tzar or Hmelnitski.
Cossacks were a designation for frontier people who more or less lived independently unless hired, or later on, forced to work.
In PLC the controversy was that this really didn't work out that well in less frontiery areas that did have feudal control, so there was formal division between "registered cossacks" who were crown's salaried soldiers, and those who didn't make the cut to get one of the limited slots in the register and so didn't get to be paid or have privileges, and PLC not enlarging the registry (which would mean paying more) was a major bone of contention for the following uprisings.
And your good buddies the Lithuanians were rether eager to forcibly converted or mistreat orthodox people.
Yeah, sure, classic accuse the other denomination of being mean to own peasants, i know, not that you or i care.
If life under you guys was that good you wouldn't have had the Potop or Hmelnitski and his bloody programs.
Potop was fucking Swedes, what do they have to do with living standards (except their looting damaging them).

Chmielnitsky in the long run made a fucking mistake with choosing sides.
Pereiaslav Agreement
The eventual consequence for the Hetmanate was the dissolution of the Zaporizhian Host in 1775 and the imposition of serfdom in the region.[15]

For Russia, the deal eventually led to the full incorporation of the Hetmanate into the Russian state, providing a justification for the title of Russian tsars and emperors, the Autocrat of all the Russias (Russian: Самодержецъ Всероссійскій).
So in the end Russia screwed over the Cossacks by taking away all the independence... they fought PLC and sided with Russia because they thought they will get more of.
Which fits with the later perspective on it:
The decision adopted in Pereiaslav is viewed by Ukrainian nationalists negatively as a failed opportunity for Ukrainian independence. Since then, Ukrainian independence during the Russian Civil War was short-lived as a result of the Ukrainian–Soviet War, with the country achieving independence during the dissolution of the USSR.[17] Pro-Russian Ukrainian parties celebrate the date of this event and renew calls for re-unification of the three East Slavic nations: Russia, Ukraine and Belarus.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top