One reason I'm not accepting the "this was just a freak accident where a whole number of things went wrong" explanation is that if it were true, then for every case where all of those things went wrong, there ought to be multiple cases in which only some of them did. How many times does it happen that a cargo ship loses control of where it's going and hits something that's not a critical part of a bridge? How many of them just run aground? Or don't hit anything but have to have tugs chase them and rescue?
Don't ask me to believe that the one time this sort of system failure occurred, the ship just happened to be pointing in the worst possible direction. That says "enemy action".
You haven't watched enough Deadliest Catch if you think ships suffering power loss issues an inopportune times is this suspicious.
Also, you have seen those videos of ships running into cranes at docks, and you have to remember Evergiven in the Suez.
Sometimes accidents happen in really shitty spots, and there doesn't need to be anything 'nefarious' or 'conspiratorial' involved, and trying to find some sort of hostile act/conspiracy in things like this just burns credibility for things that matter.
It's like Alex Jones and the Sandy Hook shit. Jones shoot himself in the foot repeatedly on that out of stubbornness and pride over his theory of events, made life hell for parents who'd just lost kids with his 'crisis actors' crap, and made it harder to believe him over things like the Wu Flu, it's vaxxes, or several other progressive plots tat have ended up outed.
Jumping the gun into conspiracy territory right off the bat, just because you think that coincidences and bad luck must equate to hostile action or a conspiracy, just burns credibility for no good reason beside clicks, at best.
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
That’s an interesting coincidence. Which I am not sure it is.
You got any proof this is not just an accident?
Because you remember the big yellow mod post a few pages back, and what it said about claims of responsibility and such?
So yeah, if you don't proof of hostile action, don't insinuate it if you want to stay in the thread.
Right wing media really is just as filled with drama queens as left wing media, isn't it?
It's filled with grifters who make their money turning everything into a conspiracy theory and pretending to have more social clout, leverage, knowledge, and pull than they actually have.
The RW media ecosystem cannot even come close to competing with most progressive/liberal media ecosystems, so it's mostly focused on grifting from the people who won't watch anything else, and who will kneejerk 'trust' RW media on the mistaken assumption that RW media personalities/channels care about more than trying to carve off a slice of their other RW competitors viewship and keep themselves afloat another month.
Even the Daily Wire is rather dodgy in this regard, because it pretends the world Ben Shapiro lives in in his head is the same one the rest of modern society lives in and shares most of the same values.
Also, a lot of people on the Right believe in a 'rational world', thus try to find some sort of person or group behind any event that seems 'irrational' to blame it on, because the Right doesn't like admitting sometimes shit happens and no amount of logic or reason can prevent it or account for it or be assigned blame for it.