"TradWives" Triggering Unhappy Feminists

SoliFortissimi said:
No, you won't. You're a lot more dependant on us than the other way around. Without us, you can't direct policy. Without you, we'll just crush the Marxists with police and the FBI. But not before religion and reactionary politics is completely stamped out as a political force.

So either be my leaders' knights, or be their pawns.
Click to expand...
Umm no the police and FBI will end up crushing you. Sure the security forces are powerful but they are legitimate because conservatives fellate them and call them heroes. To be honest anyone can do that job and it is replaceable. So the FBI can be staffed with commies.

Also the normal conservatives would have no problem being knights. But the problem is that there has to be compensation. The "fiscal conservatives" you are a part of are notoriously stingy. Sure the left might have bad ideas as a whole. But they have no problem giving out bribes and financial incentives for the lower class who they want to entice. You need to either entice the lower class/working class conservatives with either true belief by doing what they consider good and passing socially conservative laws(which you don't want to do) OR with money and bribes. Are you willing to do either?

Because here is the thing the "moderate" republicans and never trumpers are ok with all of the social liberal things, but they just want to have the rich profit off the nation but prevent the common man from doing so.

So why should we pick you over the Socialists?
 
SoliFortissimi said:
Let me put it this way: I'm not going to get whacked by HR, and may get a better job or higher pay if the people I vote for win. And that's why I'll vote for them. The people you vote for will never win, and you'll get only a fraction of what you want if they win- if at all. And if they don't, the Marxists will ban you from social media. I, meanwhile, will just parrot whatever they say and get on.

Does that illustrate the difference between two powerless little people who support different factions of the same movement? It's why we are Real Conservatives, and you're just the people the big men string along like a woman that's being ghosted after a one night stand.
Click to expand...

That’s a really long winded way of saying: “I have no actual principles.”

It’s also a really weird flex, but I guess you do you?
 
King Arts said:
Also the normal conservatives would have no problem being knights. But the problem is that there has to be compensation. The "fiscal conservatives" you are a part of are notoriously stingy. Sure the left might have bad ideas as a whole. But they have no problem giving out bribes and financial incentives for the lower class who they want to entice. You need to either entice the lower class/working class conservatives with either true belief by doing what they consider good and passing socially conservative laws(which you don't want to do) OR with money and bribes. Are you willing to do either?
Click to expand...
A lot of conservative voters want stuff like lower taxes and business regulation rather than socialism with a different paint on giving bribes to slightly different (or worse, in case of some big brained schemes i saw from people with such ideas, the same) demographics.
You will never out-socialist the actual socialists. This is a fight they will gladly take you on if you offer it to them, because they know they will win it.
King Arts said:
Because here is the thing the "moderate" republicans and never trumpers are ok with all of the social liberal things, but they just want to have the rich profit off the nation but prevent the common man from doing so.

So why should we pick you over the Socialists?
Click to expand...
Because the politicians who tolerate existing crap are still not as bad as those who actively try to create even more crap.
 
Marduk said:
A lot of conservative voters want stuff like lower taxes and business regulation rather than socialism with a different paint on giving bribes to slightly different (or worse, in case of some big brained schemes i saw from people with such ideas, the same) demographics.
You will never out-socialist the actual socialists.

Because the politicians who tolerate existing crap are still not as bad as those who actively try to create even more crap.
Click to expand...
Well those who are only interested in fiscal issues might find themselves kicked out of the conservative movement.

Also relying on the other side being worse won't last for long. If you literally do nothing it's just a stalling tactic. And then might as well join up with the socialists since either the ideology works and commoners get a better life, OR(the more likely option) a Soviet Union style collapse with a new government and a chance for a breath of fresh air.
 
King Arts said:
Well those who are only interested in fiscal issues might find themselves kicked out of the conservative movement.
Click to expand...
In a perfect world, sure, even better those who are only interested in fiscal issues should be reminded that even if they are not interested in the "other issues", the other issues are very much interested in them and their fiscal issues.
King Arts said:
Also relying on the other side being worse won't last for long. If you literally do nothing it's just a stalling tactic.
Click to expand...
Stalling is better than progressing their revolution.
King Arts said:
And then might as well join up with the socialists since either the ideology works and commoners get a better life, OR(the more likely option) a Soviet Union style collapse with a new government and a chance for a breath of fresh air.
Click to expand...
This is childish level of optimism if you believe it.
The plan is quite clear, the left has a lot of ideas of what constitutes "better life for the commoners" and they will use 100% of the power of all the social institutions they are stubbornly capturing to convince the commoners of it, or at least ensure they don't dare to disagree, that works too.
So enjoy your "better life for the commoners" in form of a very diverse 15 minute city, bicycling to work like North Koreans, while listening to propaganda broadcasts (different ones from the North Koreans of course) reminding you how much better life is for the commoners with so much diversity while Saving the Climate.

Do you even read WEF?
Yes you can outbid them. It's just that your side sabotaging all attempts to get the ball rolling on setting up bribes.
Click to expand...
Their side will bid much higher bribes than yours. Even to the point of destroying the country, for they care less about it than you.
 
SoliFortissimi said:
We can all hang together, or we'll all hang separately.
Click to expand...
Bro, keep let us doing what we’re doing bro, never mind that we’re just the Democrats from 10 years ago bro and secretly work for the same people, bro. You have to trust us and let us screw you otherwise the socialists will do it to you bro, can’t you see we’re your only other option bro, you need us bro.

Is what you actually mean.
 
SoliFortissimi said:
No, you won't. You're a lot more dependant on us than the other way around. Without us, you can't direct policy. Without you, we'll just crush the Marxists with police and the FBI. But not before religion and reactionary politics is completely stamped out as a political force.

So either be my leaders' knights, or be their pawns.
Click to expand...
Sigh.Religion made society,and society made politics.If you remove religion,there would be no society,only horde of animals.
Even marxism become religion in countries,where they win.
Becouse without religion society do not exist.Ask yourself - why murder is bad? or rapie? or stealing other people property? only religion answer that.


And what is "reactionary" ? becouse marxist name as such every normal thing in our world,like free market or family.

You want "stamp out" religion and "reactionary politics" ? congrats,you are marxist,so you could not crush them.Well,unless you want to commit suicide.
 
Blasterbot said:


I am torn here. so Ima throw it to you guys. Does the Wife letting the kid eat a stick of butter count as a fault for divorce?
Click to expand...

The stick of butter thing isn’t in and of itself bad.

A lot of people in the carnivore diet community do that, as it’s a good way to get the fat needed for energy given the lack of carbs in that dietary model.

The problem comes when you combine that with a diet already high in carbs. It can be especially problematic if those are highly processed empty carbs low in overall nutritional value.

In short, the stick of butter isn’t necessarily wrong if it’s being consumed within the proper dietary model but can be disastrous if combined with an already poor diet.
 
Blasterbot said:


I am torn here. so Ima throw it to you guys. Does the Wife letting the kid eat a stick of butter count as a fault for divorce?
Click to expand...

Pretty sure this is child abuse in some way?
StormEagle said:
The stick of butter thing isn't in and of itself bad.

A lot of people in the carnivore diet community do that, as it's a good way to get the fat needed for energy given the lack of carbs in that dietary model.

The problem comes when you combine that with a diet already high in carbs. It can be especially problematic if those are highly processed empty carbs low in overall nutritional value.

In short, the stick of butter isn't necessarily wrong if it's being consumed within the proper dietary model but can be disastrous if combined with an already poor diet.
Click to expand...
Which, going by the mother's beliefs, is pretty much a given, I think.

She thinks child obesity is a myth.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top