Search results for query: *

No,in 1944 and later 1945.Soviet collapse would gave them few more months.

Not able to mass-produce it like USA- agree. But they could made and use 2-3 of them. If they drop one on Moscov,enough to implode soviets,becouse everybody there would start killing each other to become next sralin. It would not change anytching on West,becouse even if germans burn London and...

Nope,soviets do not have right scientists,germans had.If they poured their money into A bomb,they would build few till 1945. Possible,if they do not waste it on V weapons and superheavy tanks. Plausible,but : 1.Americans do not lost any carrier in 1941 anyway. 2.Brits could take Africa in...

Both was proof,that thanks to Hitler stupidity germans wasted resources which could they use to defend themselves. Which,in our scenario,mean that germans would fight in soviets till 1945,when USA drop A bomb on them. Which they could create if they used resources wasted on V weapons,but...

Guderian blamed on Hitler fact,that it was not made earlier. Maybe he was wrong,or try to defend his own mistakes. But even if Hitler do notching there,he certainly wonted Maus and Rats mass produced,and turning Me262 into bomber. Not mention wasting money on V1 and V2. Here,with more...

And still Hitler turning it into bomber fucked it even more. Not only that - in Guderian memories i read,that Hetzer could be produced earlier,if Hitler do not sabotaget it. So,as long as he lead germans,soviet even without Lend-lease would hold between Don and Wolga,or,if he made something...

Except those belonging to USA,which never get targeted. But,as i mentioned earlier,as long as Hitler lived more factories do not mean more useful stuff,but stupid things like Mouse or V2. Well,V2 was good for future satellites,but as weapon it was joke.Just like V1. Even sensible ones,like Me...

Do not matter.German production was never stopped by bombers,in fact they produced more and more till 1944,when they have problems with resources. The same problems with resources would stop them now. And,you forget Adolf the Idiot.In OTL he wonted Maus superheavy tank built,which was stopped...

Then,they would built 25k T.34,and more truck and planes.Enough to hold germans - who during entire war made maybe 18k tanks. Rommel with 2 dyvisions and another 2 italians ALMOST take Egypt,win outnumbered,and Allies need 2:1 advantage to defeat him. Zukov - never attacked without 3:1...

So,they could lost Leningrad and Stalingrad,maybe later Moscov - but i doubt it. Soviets still produced 50.000 T.34 on their own,the same goes for planes and artillery. Lend-Lease was important when it come to trucks,trains,and ammo.Soviets without that could only hold - but,with Hitler help...

They hold them with their own industry in 1942,becouse Lend-Lease do not come in great numbers yet. So,they continue to do so on their own,unless germans get smart and made people there free.Not possible. And,Hitler was genuine idiot - so his handling of german armies would help soviets,too.

Soviets would never be destroyed,becouse germans were too stupid to come as liberators there,so they would fight to death. Add Hitler stupidity,and front would be between Don and Dniepr when muschroom become visible over Berlin and few other german cities.

True. You could beat Japan first,only if USA focused on Pacyfic and send notching soviets - thanks to that Japan could be beaten in 1944,when germans would still fought on Ukraine and Belarus. Not possible,becouse FDR loved soviets,and his vice,Wallace,was soviet agent. Unless Republican...

1.Kill Hitler in 1942/there was almost succesfull attempt then/ Germans do not go for Kursk battle,only prepare defense.Soviets get on Dniepr by 1.5.45,when Allies would be still boggled in France/more german tanks there/. So,first Atomic bomb is dropped on Berlin,when soviets fight for...