Search results

Red Alert 4? :whistle:

Through Alaska probably. Like they are pretty close geographically.

Is it sad that things have gotten to the point people go directly to how this makes the current government look bad as opposed to concerned about another national hostage situation?

Here is hoping it gets struck down as the illegal shitstain tinpot hoopla of a policy it is.

Ugh, commutes are double hell now.

Meh, maybe.

Or you know you can vote for the inparty competition against the 13 douchebags. If I remember right you can do THAT unless you are a signed member so I guess you really are stuck not voting for candidates you didn't bother helping be picked.

Also can't find any news links but it seems some attempt to make that 'congress shouldn't actively trade stocks' thing for shot down in a vote.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/with-corporate-tax-off-table-us-democrats-turn-billionaires-fund-spending-bill-2021-10-25/ Again conflicted. On one hand thats dumb would result in most of the seized assets value being lost, crushing the economy and setting hyperinflation into a speed run. On...

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/21/fed-to-ban-policymakers-from-owning-individual-stocks-restrict-trading-following-controversy.html Now if only this applies to their families and congress.

Then do they really? There a rhetorical reply equally as empty as my first post.

People honestly still think stuff like precedent or legal minutia matter in public debates or political opinions?

Meh, I like my idea better. Germ warfare restrictions and consent based medical treatments are sooooo last millennium. 🤡

In this age of prevailing domestic terrorism Antrax attacks are again a Public Heath risk. It is imperative that Antrax Vaccine Mandates are implemented. In this age of prevailing domestic terrorism Rabies attacks are again a Public Heath risk. It is imperative that Rabies Vaccine Mandates are...

Fuck you levels of money is whatever level of money you require to no longer care about what others idiots think. It can be a billion dollars or it can be 2 grand. Depends on the person honestly. Its always falling apart for the opposition. Especially when its falling upward.

Think the sentient is. Either there was a law or there was a 'law' amounting to 'don't make the boss look bad'. Either way don't think the people angry about it care much.

People competent enought to accrue fuck you levels of money or inherited a support base from parents competent enough to accrue it and successfully pass it on to their children generally can run circles around policies written by two bit hacks pulling stunts to induce bribes in the first place...

So the solution to a Death Tax in your mind is a Death Forced Redistribution? Setting aside how any monetary point put on these things is always arbitrary, in the sense that whatever the proposer thinks is 'fair' or thinks they can get away with. All this adds is a forced requirements for...

Heh, called it on that argument. And the response is that why not cut out layers instead of adding more obfuscation to the pile. Because if you have to try and hide just how much money you take through layers what is it for? To make just how much you charge people less rage inducing by doing it...

The argument there is you were taxed for buying them, you were taxes for earning the money you used to buy them, you were taxed for actions taken to maintain them, and even for continual ownership of them. The seller was taxed for the sale, the seller was taxed for purchasing the product...