Search results

To summarize the post, she admitted to masturbating while her significant other was asleep next to her or sleeping by herself, despite the SO saying it made her uncomfortable; one time placing the SO's hand on her boxers while the SO was asleep; and finally disabling alarms the SO used to try to...

She, not so much. The publisher stopped distributing the book once he was exonerated, which makes it not libel for either (as neither knew that what they were saying was wrong at the time, and actually very reasonably thought it was true). The prosecutor is also immune under prosecutorial...

She very much didn't make up being raped, there's plenty of evidence for that. And she did nothing wrong, so she doesn't owe him money. It would be nice for her to do so, but she isn't obligated here. She's just found out she's been victimized again by the prosecutor robbing her of justice so...

Well this just sucks all around. Both the guy getting wrongly convicted and Sebold finding out that her rapist is free. All because of prosecutorial misconduct (he basically told Sebold who to point at after she identified the wrong person).