Search results for query: *

I’m not sure if he wouldn’t expand it at all...the problem is that you need to strike a balance between just enough to be effective but not so much that power is centralized in Washington. Granted there’s only so much he can do by himself, and he may be under pressure to expand anyway...

Point taken. Though I still think there's less of a push to drastically expand the federal government. Foreign policy wise other than the changes noted (assuming Britain and France don't decide to go "fuck it" and not decolonize), I don't see much difference. The problem is that the U.S. public...

Except that isn’t the U.S. The extent that the U.S. has territorial ambitions is securing our position in North America. Siberia is worthless to us -oh, sure, great, natural resources. That we can’t exploit. In territory already belonging to another major power. That we have never had interest...

He’s not going to touch Siberia. There is literally no good reason to do so. Yeah it sucks about the gulags but...Siberia is a fucking wasteland with no strategic value to the U.S. Especially when there are far more urgent priorities. Now, one thing to keep in mind is that Reagan won’t be able...