Search results

It's better treatment than what the locals do to each other. They go both in hand when the glow in the darks get info right in front of them and fail to act.

Negligence from the spooks seem to be the answer.

The French still have a good military to conduct usually successful military operations against any third rate army. To really test anyone's military we need a war between peers to test that but preferably when we're all dead. The first world war had every European Empire preparing to murder...

I don't believe any first world army has come to test that unless the shit going on in Ukraine and Syria when Russian contractors got killed count.

From the perspective of waging war would it be preferable to have allies to help with the war you're in especially if they're reliable?

You mean Libya and Obama? I think that was to delegate the responsibility and save costs.

I just don't know it very much besides what is mentioned and the French Foreign Legion. There's always someone bitching about French Imperialism for the interventions but it's standard fare.

I'll be fair to the French that after getting involved in two world wars it's not surprising the locals got the right time to rebel.

Shipmaster sane didn't mention the French.

It's always the political will that hamstrung you. Plus poor choice of allies. @Shipmaster Sane which disastrous campaign are you talking about besides the Soviets in Afghanistan?

If only we knew what cost the Cubans for a military commie adventure to Africa besides their war hero getting officially executed for smuggling drugs supposedly.

I'm more in favor of decapitation body counts of targets who can lead. It does work enough for propoganda purposes until the enemy still continues fighting.

This one?