Search results for query: *

It's already 16 pages and the Moderation has already had to move in on SB. Honestly its a wonderful paradox of people trying to skirt the rules on wishing on covid, and others thinking its simply a hoax or merely an excuse for trump.

An added advantage is that the appearance of proper use of the mute is near impossible. Going by the last debate Trump will try to talk more than Biden, and the sheer number of mutes will make it seem like its trying to silence Trump. A panel of journalists after the fact trying to defend each...

Thing is there is actually a lot there he got Biden to say. Let me ask the thread these questions based solely on the debate. Does Joe Biden support the Green New Deal? Does Biden want to pack the court? Does Biden want to defund the police? The answers are potentially disastrous among...

Knowing very little about Dan Bongino outside of just watching his view of the debate I have to agree with his take on it for the most part. Even in this thread there seems to be people who support Trump arguing that he made a mistake strategically. No one is arguing that he himself performed...

I mean there was a time when its was ubiquitous in American culture that the left was the naive good guys that were votable when times where good and you wanted to help the perceived unfortunate. The right was the sometimes crazy but were better at economy policy and handling crisis. And as a...

Mic mute is a great idea for Trump, give even more of an appearance of partisanship when they have to mute him a dozen more times than Biden. And that's if a former Biden intern can justify every single use of the mute button. He makes a single mistep out of sympathy and suddenly the Right has...

I think Trump did a wonderful job in exposing Biden's senility and more importantly weakness on issues the progressive left think are important. He said he doesn't support the Green New Deal and Defunding the Police. He also literally confused his two sons together for a whole segment. Right...

50/50 split in polls that constantly showed a Hillary lead last time, that either means public opinion changes so fast that polling is useless to predict an outcome, or the results are skewered in some major way and therefore useless to predict an outcome. I am prepared for a Biden win, as...

I think he gains the advantage of having people who honestly care about this issue, and therefore has already know his position watch the narrative go around again in the news. Every time the Media reprints the same old tired story, more people have the chance to see the spin and question the...

That's just it, I have been trying to explain it this entire time. It's a debating tactic, a political strategy. I am sorry you don't like the answer. But I have been giving you an honest one this entire time.

Then you at least understand my frustration then, as you yourself refuse to properly face my points on the matter and continue to seek out what you see as a fragile point of the argument the same question over and over again. Which is exactly my point. You have gone as far as to suggest there...

His words were literially ignored in the followup to the debates, so I find that argument to already have been disproven. You yourself have ignored his answer. I think you answer your question with the question itself. What do you hope to gain by having me answer that question? And I think...

It's not an esoteric political stance asked in some random interviews. It's probably the single most reviewed question about Trump in the media. They just don't like repeating his answers to it. Morning shows, poltical commentary, prime time news. ect. Honestly the debate is not a bigger...

Exactly the point. It doesn't matter to the people who don't care about his actual answer to the question, and it won't matter to the people who do care about the question and already seen his answer. Which probably covers that entire 100 million audience last night.

Just as you ignore the fact that he has given a strong answer before on this topic and therefore prove yourself that the act is pointless. You would simply ask the question again and grill him again for his answer. If an answer is refused and ignored, why give it again? You couldn't do it once.

Because Rocinante continues to deny that you can reach a point that a question itself can become disingenuous and superfluous when asked and received the same answers for three years in front of millions of people.

That's all well and good Rocinante, but would you take a moment before we continue to disavow baby eating?

See? You couldn't even do it once.

Are you sure? You want me to ask you the same question for the next three years and see if you never, ever give a flippant answer? Or blow me off? Or not answer me at all? Do you Rocinante, take this time to disavow the eating of babies?

How do you figure that? How many times are you obligated to give a strong answer before the question itself becomes disingenuous? How many times should I hear you deny yourself be called a murderer before I stop caring what your answer should be Rocinante? Because I know the answer?