Search results

  1. IndyFront

    Protecting And Serving: Cop (mis)behavior and consequences general discussion

    I'm one of those centrists that thinks we need a balance between local and federal gov't here in the US. We need to have strong enough local governments to keep the federal authorities in check, and vice-versa since too much local autonomy would result in the inevitable break-up of the United...
  2. IndyFront

    Protecting And Serving: Cop (mis)behavior and consequences general discussion

    That's awesome. It's based as fuck when law enforcement and military actually has some goddam street smarts for a change
  3. IndyFront

    Protecting And Serving: Cop (mis)behavior and consequences general discussion

    Why you people think a potentially dangerous person (Again, most likely TO THEMSELVES as ya'll have correctly pointed out) would be "calmed down" by the sight of 3 armored fighting vehicles and police in armored vests armed with lethal weaponry IN THE FIRST PLACE is beyond me. And as you've...
  4. IndyFront

    Protecting And Serving: Cop (mis)behavior and consequences general discussion

    My bad. Saw the other posts and just lumped yours in with them. My mistake.
  5. IndyFront

    Protecting And Serving: Cop (mis)behavior and consequences general discussion

    You're all wrong. Mentally ill people =/= violent people. Period. Saying these two types of people are the same is incorrect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560322000573
  6. IndyFront

    Protecting And Serving: Cop (mis)behavior and consequences general discussion

    Notwithstanding all the unnecessary responsibilities shouldered on rank and file police officers. Wouldn't it be better to, say, have a medical or mental healthcare professional deal with involuntary commissions to mental healthcare facilities, as an example? The presence of cops and treating...
Back
Top