Search results

Honestly, most female military members who become pregnant aren't likely to abort anyway, because then they might be eligible for deployment.

Nope, not that I'm aware of. Honestly doubt anyone is looking to hard.

Honestly just should have called it a "Civil Union" or something, leaving all the main benefits of Marriage, joint taxes, able to vist in the hospital, power of attorney, and so on, while leaving out the religious aspects of a Marriage.

The highest BAH is in Hawaii I believe, followed by New York. I've been out a few years so maybe it's changed.

In theory IVF is just the fertilization of an egg outside the uterus, which is then either frozen to be utilized at a later date, or replanted in the uterus. The issue is that overtime, people have begun fertilizing multiple eggs at a time to improve the chances of success, then destroying any...

No, civilian spouses are in no way bound by the UCMJ, the military has zero authority over civilians, especially in matters of law. That being said, it is still possible for the Military to punish a service member for something the civilian spouse has done. A personal example, a Petty Officer I...

I think it's just General Woke putting his foot in his mouth. Even if the military plans to continue allowing women serving to get abortions, they can't very well do it in states which have no abortion clinics. Which means they'll be flying those women to states that do have abortion clinics...

This isn't a surprise. They have been threatening this ever since the leak. This was the intended outcome.

You'll find no argument from me that our adoption and foster care services are abysmal. But in my opinion a life in an abysmal public service is better than no life at all.

I'd care more if it wasn't for the fact that the vast majority of abortions aren't due to rape. Because they aren't, its an incredibly small percentage.

The violinist argument doesn't work. Because unlike a pregnancy the individual didn't agree to an act that they knew could result in another person becoming dependent on them.

Sorry, those don't have anything to do with killing babies so the left isn't interested.

Thats the wrong way to think about it, because they haven't actually lost any rights, there never was a "right to abortion".

Nice to see some parts of the Conservative movement have a backbone. Unlike another 14 certain individuals that claim to represent Conservatives...

Riots and likely more terrorist attacks at planned pregnancy centers by radical left wing feminists.

And now the real battle begins.

Guess I'll keep avoiding Seattle.

I wonder if it'll be pre or post mid terms?

I was making a broader generalization about the inequality in what the average citizen can get vs what the security details of politicians can get. What I wasn't doing was making an exact technical specification between the two firearms, because they don't actually matter to the point I was...

Ehhhh, I mean yeah a Thompson will do what it's supposed to do, but there is a reason it's not still standard issue, mainly to do with the fact that it is an obsolete weapon. Not useless, but certainly lacking many of the incremental improvements that have been made in the field of firearms in...