Search results

If someone is posting a video, clearly they think other people should watch it. It's reasonable to expect them to provide a basic justification for why it's worth someone else's time. If they don't want to, that's up to them, but it'll generally mean fewer people will watch the video they linked.

No, it's not. If marriage is definitionally a committed relationship between a man and a woman, then there is no discrimination for not 'allowing' homosexuals to marriage, because by the definition of the word it is not possible. 'Civil union' laws were pushed for in some states, and that has...

No, the reason it's poor legal reasoning, is because until the LGBT activists got at it, marriage had a very clear definition, and that definition was one man, one woman. They're not making a legal argument so much as they are forcing the word 'marriage' to have a different meaning.

The war is rather demonstrating that it is the other way around. Pre-2014, the Ukrainians may have been more corrupt, but things have changed to at least some degree.

Enslavement. 'Treason' is too highly variable a term to include.

You are showing a fundamental disregard for human life. The reason that the woman is in an ugly situation is because of a crime. That crime was rape, one of the three most heinous crimes a person can commit. If it wasn't doing nasty things to someone, putting them in a painful situation, it...

There's a difference between triage, recognizing that you can't save everyone so acting to save those you can, and killing the innocent. What you are suggesting is the same as if my father raped someone (which he would never do), that woman was then permitted to kill me. I bear no guilt in...

No, it does not. I'm sure there are a few people who keep such views very quiet who are members, but white nationalists are not a part of the Republican Party in any meaningful way, they have no influence on its platform, its policies, or its candidates. Any who become openly known as such get...

So, you're fine with 'aborting' children up to the age of at least three or four years old? Also, you've made it rather obvious that you have little to no functional ability to understand the logic of others. You certainly don't understand mine.

The definition you used said 'capable of Darwinian evolution.' Darwinian evolution requires reproduction. Humans reproduce through fetuses. Thus, this is part of the life-cycle, and must be alive in order to count. Your own given definition defeats your own argument. (This post brought to...

By the definition from NASA you linked, a fetus is alive from the moment of conception.

Do you have any idea what cultural values do and do not make a society work? Because your lack of care about infanticide and people's lives collapsing really suggests you do not.

Again, more than one issue can be pressed at a time. What is your odd fixation on trying to ignore this issue?

You know, it is possible to have more than one issue in mind when one's engaging in political and cultural discourse? Also, comparing 'People are actually being murdered and dismembered' to 'how dare these right-wingers expect women to deal with the consequences of their actions!' is extremely...

'Pro-choice' Republicans barely exist outside of areas completely controlled by the left, and even there, they're not exactly common. From an ideological perspective, actual conservatives are not going to court them on this issue, because we're not compromising on murdering babies. From a...

This may be the most out-of-touch thing I've ever seen you post on this forum. You really think that Pro-Life voters, especially single-issue-voters, are going to just not vote when they now need to ensure appropriate laws are passed on a state level? Sure, a handful will, but you really think...

He's 'catholic' in the same way any die-hard leftist in the last fifty years has been. Until maybe ten years ago, it was functionally impossible to get elected to the Presidency if you weren't a Christian, Jewish, or Mormon, and hard to get anything higher than Representative. Go back twenty...