Search results

Memeing on that interview is a wide scale phenomenon by now:

I'm pretty damn sure that if he gets charged with something, it won't be for going to first random money exchange and buying some rubles like any ordinary person would (which seems to be the random ass guess based strawman you are clobbering so hard). But what we know little of, the man had...

But which party partisan? GOP is split 50/50, and DNC has majority pro-Ukraine but there's also some crazy left that's pro-Russia.

Yeah, there's no decent legal grounds for it, unless it's a money thing we don't know about.

Not since the Ribbentrop-Molotov pact existed, and especially the secret protocol to it. It wasn't opportunistically grabbed from right before Germany's nose, it was a pre-planned and mutually agreed upon deal. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact#Secret_protocol Classic...

Which is another way to also phrase it in a blatantly deceptive way that in the context is an open way to grind a political axe. It's like saying "Americans invaded Normandy for the same reason Hitler did". A neutral way to say this would be "Poland opportunistically took its own old...

That stuff is not news. That is, Carlson's Russia simping hobby. It's consistent, long running, and no secret. The good news is that Donald Trump and Tucker Carlson are not the same person...

If that's what he's saying then it's even more straight bullshit. Hitler didn't *give* Zalolzie to Poland in any sense of the term. Yes, which has a slightly wider implication with point 1, in a way allying Poland with Hitler.

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-putin-defends-hitlers-invasion-poland-carlson-interview-1868582 Turns out not only DNC has a problem with an old man (or men?) in leadership position and shortage of mental agility needed for that position.

As someone who actually lives in Europe in a country that used to be Russia's vassal for some time, i say take this shit to some russiaboos and German neoliberals because no one else believes it.

No. That's the propaganda offer. The real offer is: all of the above, all current conquests go to Russia, plus you do nothing while we exploit all of the above to eventually gain full informal, and in some years formal control of Ukraine. I'm not even making educated guesses, here's a case study...

I'm not one to take neocons at their word, even if i agree with them on some things, even less so when their words are relayed by proxy who openly dislikes them. I think Ukrainians would be more than fine with hearing that "they die for the interests of American Empire" if that's what's going...

If that's the case, that makes them good allies. Only idiots or traitors would want to take a deal from Russia or surrender to it as things stand.

Only, not just. A big part of that is migration, Russians can't go to EU so easily, but that doesn't mean those Ukrainians never will return. Russia will remain a threat until political changes, the only difference is if its gonna be more or less distant one. It's the appeasement lobby that...

I'll take being a spokesman for Raytheon over being an isolationist. And that's going to be the end of history and nothing will happen further? Yeah, sure. If i believed that would be the end of the conflict for good, it would be a deal to consider. But i don't. It would be peace for 2 years, 5...

13.5% vs 17% is a 21% relative difference, wouldn't call that far worse. Then you think wrong. It would be a major threat of NATO unraveling, and if you think that's not a significant effect on US long term strategic thinking you probably give up on thinking about these things. Russia grabbing...

I would not say far worse. It does look like their late 90's/early 00's economic troubles had worse effect on fertility and migration (to add to the irony, at that time it had the supposedly oh so beneficial Russian friendship), but the shape of the pyramids is remarkably similar. Patently...

Are you going to be fair and make the same exact argument about the very similar population pyramid of Russia and make the same conclusion regarding plans of its leadership, or would you prefer to leave that part unsaid because it doesn't support the conspiracy theory you want...

I already dissected your attempt to conflate different arguments with mine and i am calling you out in a civil manner to stop it. I don't care about someone else wanting him banished, i already said my opinion on it. However, in previous posts you have stated that "Americans are allowed to hear...

The principle is the same. CCP is a closer one and widely noted as a major problem. Though the leftists also argue that they are only serving information to those they propagandize, be it children with sex stuff, college students with race stuff, or workplaces with DEI propaganda. By that logic...