1. M

    How capable would NATO be of countering a conventional assault on multiple fronts by its enemies against both them and other parties?

    Yet again you show how little you know. https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/02/attack-on-europe-documenting-equipment.html Almost 2000 lost is a lot of very intensive "not using". https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/the-russians-lost-18-old-bmp-1-fighting-vehicles-in-just-a-day-or-so/ar-AA1e74jG...
  2. M

    How capable would NATO be of countering a conventional assault on multiple fronts by its enemies against both them and other parties?

    No more obsolete than the other side, so they aren't obsolete, and don't throw doomer math at me. Ukraine still has an air force after over 2 years of war. Air force made of Soviet planes with few modernizations. We don't need to check to know they will suck at shooting down planes from this...
  3. M

    How capable would NATO be of countering a conventional assault on multiple fronts by its enemies against both them and other parties?

    Add Spain, Italy, Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Romania, Hungary, Turkey, Greece, that's 13 total. Some smaller countries may send a brigade each to replace 2-3 that flake due to politics. Add our 5. We're talking 16-20 divisions, with other divisions of the major powers acting as...
  4. M

    How capable would NATO be of countering a conventional assault on multiple fronts by its enemies against both them and other parties?

    Yes. Also NATO. There's 32 countries in NATO now. If only half of them could just send 1 division against Russians because others are too small or too leftist, that's still 16 divisions coming from 3 directions. Of course we buy missiles for them too. Same as airplanes and many parts for tanks...
  5. M

    How capable would NATO be of countering a conventional assault on multiple fronts by its enemies against both them and other parties?

    Where do you think all the new tanks are going? There's a reason why they are more numerous than the old tanks... Also Rosomak is still in production. We need those too for such a conflict. Even Ukrainians are getting better, why should we get worse with having NATO army. If they attack, we...
  6. M

    How capable would NATO be of countering a conventional assault on multiple fronts by its enemies against both them and other parties?

    Prove they are without weapons. They even show what they already have formed. Just because a division lacks few support components still doesn't mean it's useless or without weapons. Yet everyone uses them too. Yeah, it's standard weapons suck, but they can be changed, or removed and the...
  7. M

    How capable would NATO be of countering a conventional assault on multiple fronts by its enemies against both them and other parties?

    Yet they still exist as divisions, and don't forget the separate brigades. Those obsolete tanks and IFVs and often also worse ones are still being used at large scale in the Ukraine war, so making my point perfectly, you are making up bullshit excuses to support your doomer bullshit spamming...
  8. M

    How capable would NATO be of countering a conventional assault on multiple fronts by its enemies against both them and other parties?

    Do you get some kind of perverse satisfaction out of spamming this doomer bullshit? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operational_Structure_of_the_Polish_Land_Forces#Armed_Forces_General_Command https://zlotystok.salwach.pl/fabryka_prochu...
  9. M

    How capable would NATO be of countering a conventional assault on multiple fronts by its enemies against both them and other parties?

    North Korea is not any more than it was before getting said deterrent when it also was not invaded for decades. North Korea is also not even reducing its massive conventional arsenal since getting it. So take this sort of childish arguments to people who know less than you about this stuff...
  10. M

    How capable would NATO be of countering a conventional assault on multiple fronts by its enemies against both them and other parties?

    Neither was Liechtenstein, therefore their deterrence is clearly working too...
  11. M

    How capable would NATO be of countering a conventional assault on multiple fronts by its enemies against both them and other parties?

    Yeah, people who whine about western countries " MiC money laundering and/or imperialistic invasions of foreigners" should be kept as far away as possible from anything defence related, because they clearly wouldn't recognize an "imperialistic invasion" if it kicked them in the ass. Nope...
  12. M

    How capable would NATO be of countering a conventional assault on multiple fronts by its enemies against both them and other parties?

    Yeah, bleeding edge tech has a lot of issues, news at eleven, also bureaucracy sucks and is expensive, but if there was less then the lawyers, and also the likes of you, would be whining about things not being transparent enough. Guess with geniuses like you in charge USA would be preparing to...
  13. M

    How capable would NATO be of countering a conventional assault on multiple fronts by its enemies against both them and other parties?

    Worst case scenario theorizing by some academic which in turn gets morphed into "best case scenario" by a clueless scaremongerer with a clear agenda. Wow, turns out that suddenly all the Raytheons, Lockheed Martins and General Dynamics that the MIC whiners whine about all the bloody time don't...
  14. M

    How capable would NATO be of countering a conventional assault on multiple fronts by its enemies against both them and other parties?

    Can i have the crystal ball you are seeing these things in? I think it may be broken, my crystal ball is arch-wizard certified and it's not showing such bullshit. Telling everyone the Russia shills are retarded? Yes, i'm doing that.
  15. M

    How capable would NATO be of countering a conventional assault on multiple fronts by its enemies against both them and other parties?

    LMAO, talk more person who knows jack shit about this stuff, we can all laugh at your scaremongering. No wonder you link to a full retard who want USA to abolish standing army, ROTFL. If that's the sort of military expertise your political side likes to show off, you deserve only mocking...
  16. M

    How capable would NATO be of countering a conventional assault on multiple fronts by its enemies against both them and other parties?

    War economy sooner than draft i would say. Even the easternmost half of the standing armies of EU-NATO would be enough to walk over the Russian military and make it regret their choices. It's the naval side of things that would need a crash expansion to fight the war in East Asia and stop Gulf...
Back
Top