Search results for query: *

When the only evidence at all is "Alex Jones" said it, I consider that the exact same as no evidence at all. One person's claim is always shaky evidence, and he has lied and mislead so often, completely and shamelessly that he deserves absolutely no benefit of the doubt.

I think you're taking sarcastic comments far too seriously. If we want to take every posters "admissions" entirely at face value, then I'd like to admit to being smarter by far than half the people posting in this thread.

The judge is required under law to take the most sympathetic possible view to the injured party when considering damages awarded, and only if they find the amount outrageous or inordinate under that test are they supposed to take action against it. Depends on the exact state of course, and I'm...

There's two fairly important things people seem to be ignorant of. The first is, alex jones was not fined. He was sued. There's a significant difference. Which relates to the second point; damages are decided by the jury. No part of the government determined what jones owes. Personally, I do...