Search results

My god you're a cunt. Their point was this is a huge derail and none of your discussion pertains at all to Tucker, let alone has your idiotic sperging out "proved" anything lmao.

This is a story he told on Lex Fridman with the implication being that this was ridiculous and would be a serious violation of his rights as an American Citizen. It would not be "hilarious" and would be further proof of a government totally at odds with its founding principles and its people.

I know its a joke but Chinese didn't own Taiwan until the late 17th century, the Portugese and Dutch have an older claim to it than China does.

According to Michael Kofman, an American military analyst of Ukrainian birth who is very pro-west and very pro-Ukraine, it was political as Zaluzhny was considered a likely challenger of Zelenskys in a future election and he's very popular in the armed forces and among the population in general...

Both things are true which is the point. It isn't just the US offloading weapons it was planning to discard, the fact it's "both" is proof that line was total bullshit. I'm responding to this

So which is? Is it that we're giving away old stuff that we're planning to throw out anyway or are we advertising to show off effectiveness and drive sales? Seems like you're walking back the comment I replied to.

This is the kind of thing charities and volunteer orgs are great at and already do a ton of. I'm not really in favor of the government being in this business, though I do agree with simple policies incentivizing it.

Your "argument" was an idiotic strawman unrelated to the actual conversation

We are also sending stuff that doesn't fit into this category e.g. HIMARS

Ah, another bad faith poster. We're discussing his right to interview him as an american, how that isn't treason, not any Russian rights, but you know that as does everyone else with basic reading comprehension. Literally the most blatantly obvious and idiotic strawman argument I've ever seen...

Yes he does though, so unless you want to elaborate on some novel theory as to why you're just wrong and annoying

Americans are allowed to hear him out but that wasn't my point, we're specifically discussing one American who travelled over there right now. There isn't a debate to be about whether we can hear Putin, it's a guaranteed right we have that's why we can buy Hitlers book and the like. But okay...

I need you to please explain to me how your mind devised this as a response and thought it made any sense at all. I said non-Americans opinion do not matter about Tucker being in Russia, in a discussion where another American said he should be banished (which you decided to take part in,) and...

Letting people hear Putins rationale and viewpoint isn't the same thing as pushing sex on children. No one expects you to have a balanced view of Russia, but America is not Poland and Americans are allowed to hear Putin out and decide if they think being eternal enemies is the right decision...

We already know Zelenskys as well, he's been all over western media for two years. Hell, the Economist just interviewed him on new years. Meanwhile I don't think there's been any Putin interview, and if there has there hasn't been many.