Search results for query: *

  1. The Name of Love

    Philosophy Sexual Orientation Doesn't Exist

    Somebody didn't read the OP. Why don't you circle back and try again? I never denied that there is such thing as same-sex attraction. Why don't you invent genders for every individual on Earth then? Why not invent orientations for every desire known to man? And better yet, make every single one...
  2. The Name of Love

    Philosophy Sexual Orientation Doesn't Exist

    But then, what is a sexual orientation then. The person who I presented isn't a "asexual" because, if sex was in the offing, they'd choose opposite-sex over same-sex every time. But they aren't "heterosexual" because their low sex drive means that there's not a stable attraction to any one sex...
  3. The Name of Love

    Philosophy Sexual Orientation Doesn't Exist

    :unsure: Again, why aren't you addressing this?
  4. The Name of Love

    Philosophy Sexual Orientation Doesn't Exist

    I showed how sexual orientation is an incoherent concept whether you define it as an identity or as a stable sexual attraction in the OP. You could at least acknowledge that argument.
  5. The Name of Love

    Philosophy Sexual Orientation Doesn't Exist

    They could be, but classifying homosexuality as an identity is basically making your preferences into the identity itself rather than simply a factor of it.
  6. The Name of Love

    Philosophy Sexual Orientation Doesn't Exist

    Missing the point, once again. I demonstrated in the OP why the labels don't make any sense. Also, if you are going to make desires identities because they impact your life, why not make an identity for every possible desire out there? We could classify people by what kind of food they eat in...
  7. The Name of Love

    Philosophy Sexual Orientation Doesn't Exist

    Run that by me again, chief? I addressed this point in the OP when I deconstructed the idea of sexual orientation. I'm not denying the feelings. I'm denying the label "homosexuality" for the reasons I gave. I find intelligent women with long hair sexy. Is this such an important aspect of...
  8. The Name of Love

    Philosophy Sexual Orientation Doesn't Exist

    Those people's subjective experiences are wrong because they are formed by a heavily propagandized social order. Human sexual preference is incredibly fluid, and there's no reason to believe that the nineteenth century taxonomy of "sexual orientation" (which, again, is based on junk science...
  9. The Name of Love

    Philosophy Sexual Orientation Doesn't Exist

    "Gay" doesn't exist. It's literally a social construct.
  10. The Name of Love

    Philosophy Sexual Orientation Doesn't Exist

    Sexual orientation does not exist. It's a social construct. Allow me to explain. But first, what is a "sexual orientation"? Well, it has to do something with the stable object of one's sexual desires. Someone who is only ever sexually attracted to people of the opposite sex is said to have a...
Back
Top