Man, great 'theory', but it comes straight into a wall of empirical facts, namely that a lot of people only experience same sex attraction. And a huge number of animals have same-sex attraction. And there is somewhat of an evolutionary advantage to some, especially in more social species. Effectively, it can be used to build bonds between parts of the group, increasing group survivability. Also, note that to succeed at passing down genes, one doesn't necessarily need to reproduce, just have a relative reproduce.
So yeah, have fun with this.
As for homosexuality being cured, the experimental evidence is a resounding no. It's been tried and triied by both professionals and non-professionals, and it never works. They can make people more asexual with aversion therapy (which is utterly horrifying in result, as you are being taught that sexual attraction = pain, and doesn't even necessarily last), but not more straight.
So yeah, have fun with this.
... Then that person is heterosexual. Or alternatively, you've found a 'conservative' (read: also stupid, but from the opposite direction) reason for the 1000's of orientations and why LGBTQ... should keep getting longer. The lefty terms for this is, among a variety of things, heterosexual & aromantic, gray-sexual, ace-spectrum, demisexual, etc. Want to go invent genders next?But then, what is a sexual orientation then. The person who I presented isn't a "asexual" because, if sex was in the offing, they'd choose opposite-sex over same-sex every time. But they aren't "heterosexual" because their low sex drive means that there's not a stable attraction to any one sex over time.
So about this. Much of this is right, there's probably a mixture of genetics that predispose one for it, and early environment that makes the 'choice' (not really a willing choice as people make the choice way to young (some people can remember their first 'gay' moment when they are really young, too young to have a real choice).hen we go a little bit deeper, then it becomes more questionable. Is this “sexual orientation” to the degree that it exists genetic and immutable? No, studies show that environment plays a large role in determining sexual preferences, including what sex we’re attracted to. The left stridently rejects that evidence and insists that gay people are born that way - which is strangely the only trait that they seem to think that people are born with. These are people who think that women are shorter than men because we are malnourished as infants by sexist parents. Can a “homosexual” be “cured?” I don’t know that answer to that, maybe so.
As for homosexuality being cured, the experimental evidence is a resounding no. It's been tried and triied by both professionals and non-professionals, and it never works. They can make people more asexual with aversion therapy (which is utterly horrifying in result, as you are being taught that sexual attraction = pain, and doesn't even necessarily last), but not more straight.