Search results for query: *
- Users: WolfBear
- With An interpretation/review of Sean McMeekin's 'The Russian Origins of World War One" thread
- Content: Threads, Posts
- Order by date
-
W
An interpretation/review of Sean McMeekin's 'The Russian Origins of World War One"
Interesting. And FWIW, I wasn't actually advocating a particular thesis here; rather simply responding to all of the specific points that you made here.- Word Count: 25
- WolfBear
- Post #5
- Forum: Post-1900 Timelines & Discussion
-
W
An interpretation/review of Sean McMeekin's 'The Russian Origins of World War One"
Russia was stronger in 1914 than it was in, say, 1910, no? That's a notable difference. Though the same could have been said for 1917 or 1920 vs. 1914 had WWI not broken out in 1914 and the alliance systems would have remained intact. Had Russia really wanted to partition the Ottoman Empire...- Word Count: 230
- WolfBear
- Post #2
- Forum: Post-1900 Timelines & Discussion