Search results

  1. W

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Pederasts can get married just so long as it is to other adults, even to childlike-looking adults. I didn't know that you are a pro-life libertarian!
  2. W

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Done: https://www.the-sietch.com/index.php?threads/adultery-bans-after-dobbs.8692/ And sorry. The specific sodomy law that was in question in Lawrence was sex-specific: Male-male sodomy was criminalized but not male-female sodomy. Sex-specific sodomy bans are a violation of the ban on sex...
  3. W

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Off-topic, but what effect would Dobbs have on adultery bans? On the one hand, Lawrence is still in effect, but on the other hand, Dobbs is somewhat in tension with Lawrence. There's an argument that Lawrence makes adultery bans untenable and thus unconstitutional.
  4. W

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Are you also against IVF?
  5. W

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    One could try getting around this by insisting on bodily autonomy, but then the pro-lifer could argue that while bodily autonomy should be very strong, it should not be absolute. And to be fair, pro-choicers who support vaccine mandates likewise agree with this idea in a general sense. And in...
  6. W

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Yep, if one rejects speciecism by arguing that it's similar to racism, sexism, et cetera, then it does seem rather logical for one to advocate treating human infants equally to (or even worse than) non-human animals with equal or greater current mental abilities. If one also argues that human...
  7. W

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Here's Peter Singer on infanticide: https://www.independentliving.org/docs5/singer.html#:~:text=Infanticide,most%20infants%2C%20for%20other%20reasons
  8. W

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Depends if they're pro-infanticide lol! :D
  9. W

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Why stop there? The logic of philosophers like Peter Singer can also be extended to "after-birth abortions" as well, after all: https://jme.bmj.com/content/39/5/261 Or we could simply have more reasonable child support laws (allowing parents to unilaterally opt-out of paying child support)...
  10. W

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Well, not unless they want another Fort Sumter.
  11. W

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    FWIW, when one profiles, one generally uses race along with various other attributes, such as sex, class, age, et cetera. So, a young black man in a suit would look less threatening than a young black man wearing ghetto clothes. But Yeah, it is sad, but it's a fact of life that when you're being...
  12. W

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    So, no racial profiling at all, then?
  13. W

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Agreed with your general premise here. I think that racial, sex, et cetera discrimination should be avoided unless it satisfies a compelling state interest and is narrowly tailored towards achieving this specific state interest.
  14. W

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    I heard that on some measures, such as unemployment and the illegitimacy rate, blacks fared better relative to whites under Jim Crow than after Jim Crow. That's not an argument in favor of Jim Crow, of course, but this does raise the question of whether some of the Left's subsequent policies...
  15. W

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Yeah, but no one (other than perhaps nonwhites themselves) actually cares that much about nonwhite-on-nonwhite violence, unfortunately, 'coz there's the feeling that it's more natural and thus not something to bother with. :( Is white advocacy OK instead?
  16. W

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    I actually agree with all of this. I'm just saying that when the current elite tends to dismiss these things (such as nonwhite-on-white violence, while aggressively hyping up any cases of white-on-nonwhite violence), it's good to have someone emphasize these things for the sake of balance. And...
  17. W

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Well, race realism involves speculating on genetic causes for average human group gaps on various important traits. And frankly, talking about nonwhite-on-white crime makes one a white advocate, does it not?
  18. W

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    There is moderate white nationalism, as opposed to the hardcore white nationalism. Specifically talking about race realism, mentioning cases of nonwhite-on-white violence whenever they occur (and which the media typically downplays), defending free speech, including extremely unpopular political...
  19. W

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Ironically, abortion bans/further abortion restrictions might accelerate the Great Replacement, which is why white nationalists have not been unequivocally in favor of them: https://www.unz.com/ghood/one-rule-for-us-another-for-them/ You need to keep in mind that the GOP is a big-tent party...
Back
Top