Search results

It won't do much to any actual fortficati9ns. It is also not an assault gun. It is as Tiamat said, more of a light tank. It is not made for any sort of direct combat, and is in the role to help the infantry accomplish thier mission without being directly engaged. Assault guns are only useful if...

Uh...it isn't an assault gun. And Bradley's did the job just fine, and would depend on tje rounds they have. It is basically replacing the Stryker 105, whoch again was not an assault gun. The 105 is not the best round to use against adobe like structure in the ME. Old Assault guns were often...

Yes. Because how else ar you supposed to make sure an idea works. For instance, railguns. We have been working on them, but they have been deemed not worth the money due to a variety of reasons. Same with aircraft etc.

I mean, the F 35 may have been a lot, but he'll if it ain't good. And yes, we spend money on trinkets so everyone else can learn if it actually works

Infact, they have a lot of encryption on them just for connection to classified systems let alone the encryption from outside in

Thay isn't why though. Because it would also he the AF and Naby fleets as well. Also, it would depend on if it is a closed network or if they connect to the standard internet as an operating system.

Again, it should be mentioned that they have taken more beating and survived then any Soviet block tank.

It is a fire support vehicle for direct fire. It is not a tank doctrinally

It is not a light tank. It is an MPF. Just happens to fit the characteristics if a light tank

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_Protected_Firepower

No, it's mobile protected firepower

It is not a light tank. It is the mobile protected firepower and is is named the M10 Booker

South Korea is becoming a major player in arms trade

US probably will with the X