Search results

  1. posh-goofiness

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Let them try. The more overreach there is the more ammunition to neuter bureaucracy.
  2. posh-goofiness

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Context? Which hospitals? Which state? What circumstances?
  3. posh-goofiness

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    The article says they "demand" it. They haven't actually done anything yet. Nothingburger- they've been demanding court packing for months now.
  4. posh-goofiness

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    That's fair. I definitely wouldn't say no to a, IDK, childcare stipend or whatever.
  5. posh-goofiness

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    I would absolutely love for every corporation that funds one to fund the other. We would see a policy reversal so fast we wouldn't even have time to say "abortion is infanticide". On the other hand, if they call our bluff, I'm not wild about corps paying for parenting. It seems like it opens...
  6. posh-goofiness

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Lol, no they can't say that at all. This logic explicitly would allow the military to just take servicemen's children and forcibly induct them into the military at birth. Or experiment on them. Or give them away to their pedophile bosses. Sweet fuck, I knew you were shill, but I never thought...
  7. posh-goofiness

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    They see it that way, @Stargazer
  8. posh-goofiness

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    I'd take that.
  9. posh-goofiness

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    This is going to be unpopular. I would prefer if government officials were stripped of security, not increased.
  10. posh-goofiness

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    @bintananth So... I guess there are pending criminal cases for conspiracy to commit murder on the docket for some J6 defendants? Right?
  11. posh-goofiness

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Personally, I think that the better fitting hypothesis is that affirmative action combined with intentionally subversive education destroyed the culture of blacks (and whites). My honest opinion is that you should advocate for yourself individually. White, black, hispanic, asian it doesn't...
  12. posh-goofiness

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Personally I think it's worse than that. I think government policies are specifically designed to undermine and destroy nonwhites while the puppets pass more laws to reverse "systemic racism". Also, apparently not.
  13. posh-goofiness

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Yes, but they push this for two reasons. Inflame the populace to divide them and to distract from the fact the nonwhite-on-nonwhite violence is at least an order of magnitude worse than cross-racial violence in either direction.
  14. posh-goofiness

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Doubtful. I think the justices, and by extensions, the courts are going to turtle up. This sort of destructive act from within is going to disrupt normal operation and make the institution weaker as a result. No good will come of this.
  15. posh-goofiness

    SCOTUS Getting Shade Over Roe v Wade

    Sure. But is he wrong?
Back
Top