Africa moved to the Pacific in the early 1400s, creating 3 "worlds"

raharris1973

Well-known member
An ASB generated "event" on the night of August 15th, 1415, spatially displaces Africa and places it in the middle of the Pacific, swapping it with most of Polynesia (save New Zealand and Easter Island) and some of Melanesia, as shown in this map.

The ASB puts a climate preservation bubble over the planet that prevents drastic climate alterations or weather disasters beyond the range or suddenness of any experienced between 1415 AD and now.



[Yes, you may notice the ASB geographic intervention is basically identical to one I proposed in a different thread, the principle difference here is the very different timeframe, the time of the European renaissance and rising gunpowder empires of Ming China, the Muscovites, and Ottomans]

3 Worlds or More

Epilogue: 13 August 1415: Two nights before the "event", the King of Portugal his son Prince Henry, his other sons and a force of 45,000 seized the first Iberian colony in Africa, the coastal town of Ceuta in Morrocco.

The spent their post victory days celebrating and fortifying the newly captured town, and sending messengers back to Portugal with the good news.

Change dawns:

On the night 15 August, after feasting and drinking and setting up night watches and a majority of men behind the fortified lines have gone to sleep from either labor, drink or both, it is midnight.

In an instant, they are all woken up by the noon-day sun appearing at the top of the sky above them, as are everyone in the Moorish camps, and most of the human and animal inhabitants of the African continent.

When the next caravans of pilgrims, alternately destined for Mecca and Medina, and for Jerusalem, come eastbound from the Nile Delta cities to cross the Sinai, they find only shoreline, the Egyptian desert, and the Nile in every direction.

Meanwhile the next morning in contemporary Sinai, migrating Bedouin and traders bound for markets in the Nile Valley trying to cross the Suez isthmus find themselves traveling in circles, finding only shoreline, except when they backtrack from whence they came.

1415 - Immediate effects in Iberia:
In Europe, Portugal has lost its royal family and top nobility as of 1415. Portugal becomes ripe for Castilian intervention and probably takeover. The lost Portuguese royals include Henry the Navigator and many of his lieutenants who systematically organized and expanded knowledge of deep sea voyaging.

They are stranded in Ceuta Morocco, un-reinforceable, doomed to fall to siege to the Moors, with some able to escape on ships but certainly not all, in vessels of mixed seaworthiness, with no friendly European shores available, just hostile Muslim ones and unknown African ones. Except for shipwrecks and ruins and the occasional Robinson Crusoe-ish tale or captivity novel, the Portuguese conquerors of Ceuta dissolve in the mists of history.

For Europe, African products and gold become unavailable. Arabia is exposed to the open sea. Venetians plying the spice route run into open water west of Sinai.

Zheng He's contemporary voyage is probably already returning to China.

But, a later Zhenge HE voyage, covering comparable distances, will find no East Africa. This makes it more likely the next expedition, if it happens, will visit Mecca, from there, next logical place to visit is Jerusalem. The Chinese would probably meet Venetians there. The Europeans could form the opinion though that the Chinese are Muslim.

This motivates advance parties in the next Zheng He fleet to follow on to Constantinople and Italian cities like Venice and Rome before the end of the 1420s. For the Italians the visit of magnificent Chinese "treasure ships" validates the tales of the Polo family, and sparks a China fever, over the next century.

This continues, even when Ming China abandons treasure fleets and treasure fleet diplomacy. The Italian trading cities do trading and cartographic expeditions between the 1420s and 1470s to retrace Zheng He's steps, and gradually refine European, and West Asian knowledge of the southern coasts of Asia. While many missions fail or are denied landing or trade rights, the persistence of the Italian trading states keeps development of competing trade routes along the southern Asian coast alive over this period, and by 1500, you have Iberian states like Aragon, Castille, and Portugal joining in the competition, and France beginning to participate, and finally England.

Between 1415 and 1515, Eurasia is mapped from Portugal to Japan. The nearest islands of Polynesia are discovered by Portuguese & Castilian mariners, with them getting down possibly to New Caledonia--but no further in that direction. Although new currents need to be navigated nimbly, Castilians, Aragonese, French, English, Venetians, Genoans, Mamluks and Turks can all reach south and east Asia just by heading east around Arabia, not having to round Africa.


Depending how far they venture into the water, Aragonese may reach Samoa, Tonga or Fiji. The Venetians, plying the spice route will work on replacing their middlemen. They will probably discover Tahiti en route, west of the coast of Arabia.

Despite Venetian experience and positional advantage, no European or Middle Eastern country's trade path east can be monopolized or closed off by chokepoints.

Despite gradual expansion of fishing voyages, no European has sent an expedition to the Americans, or reported an accidental discovery, because no one is crossing south of the equator doing the volta do mar. In fact, many still believe it impossible. Sea-based trading over this time further marginalizes the steppe route. Venetians-Genoans-Pisans probably establish trading posts in India and the spice islands before other Europeans. All things being equal, the Chinese don't stop them.

They will not re-find Africa for a long time, although perhaps, before the Americas

Castille probably accelerates conquest of Granada, which has no close-by help. Expelled Jews and Moriscos do not have the Maghrib to go to. They have to go to other opportune places in Europe, the Ottoman territories, Levant, or points east. Expulsion might be somewhat less likely with both harder to find places to send them and less anxiety about close Muslim threat. But greed and status competition could still motivate it.

In 1500s or 1600s, Castilian, French and English monarchs probably stake their own claims in eastward bound trade routes.

Americas 1415-1615 -

I am anticipating the Americas are continuing to develop independently and undiscovered during these two centuries, which also means that the effects of their human depopulation and of the worldwide spread of their crops and precious metals are not felt during this time.

Impact on Muslim-Christian frontiers and slavery:

Turks are taking Constantinople at least on schedule, in my opinion. African slaves unavailable for court eunuchs. I suspect the Ottoman Turks will have an even easier time conquering the Mamluk Levant since it is separate from its Egyptian economic hinterland after 1415.

In southwest Asia, there is a long term demographic impact, less African genetic imprint (through the female line) on Ottoman Empire, demand for Balkan and Caucasian slaves is all the greater.

Europeans don't have to deal with Barbary pirates. Western Europeans on the Atlantic coast and Spanish and French Mediterranean are safer from slavers, although Ottomans could sponsor expeditions that hit Italy and Croatia hard.

Meanwhile, in Pacific Africa, the Mamelukes have lost their Levantine territories. They have lost their ability to replenish their ranks with Circassians or Turks. They have choices to make about how they replenish the Mamluk service - do they draw from desert Bedouin families or Arab fellahin farming families? Or stick with a model of recruiting foreign soldiers only. Do they possibly use Sub-Saharan Africa/Sudan as the new source of slave/warrior recruits?

For slaves or expansion, they can only go up the Nile. Likewise, the Maghreb states are safe from Christian attack, and have no one to raid. For slave labor they will have to reach up into sub-saharan Africa as well.

None of the Maghreb or West African cultures have strong long-range sea-faring traditions.

Pilgrimage becomes impossible for African Muslims. Egyptians find open water and the small Polynesian island of Rapa Iti to their east. Omanis in Zanzibar are used to longer distance travel, and will find they can easily access Egypt and the Maghreb. They have a chance, but only a slim one, of finding Peru or the west coast of Mesoamerica.

"North African" demand for slave labor can only be met within the continent, which perhaps leads to a short term increase in enslavement, but over the longer run, by the late 1500s and 1600s there is no slave trade with Europeans or plantation system, leaving Africa more populous and without slave trade motivated conquest.

Africa has become its own world, separate from America, and now, separate from Europe and Asia as well.

There is no old world-new world exchange of diseases and crops and animals. No potatoes, tomatoes, chocolate or possibly even coffee. Spices are the big trade product, and sugar is the only plantation crop, and it's available in less quantity. The persistence of coffee depends on how many bushes were in gardens in southwest Asia (like Yemen) at this time.
The continents will be reunited at some point, though it's uncertain if Africa will be rediscovered before the Americas are discovered.

Also, the changed geography means that South America will likely be the last discovered continent in the world (except Antarctica). North America will be discovered via northern routes, with the question being whether there is more impetus from fishermen and later fur trappers from northwest Europe, or from Russian fur trappers crossing the Bering strait.

Ming Dynasty Chinese would have ability to journey to Africa and back, but they are unlikely to believe there is anything interesting worth looking for.

This prolonged separation of the African, American and Eurasian worlds means that gold and silver are scarcer in the Eurasian economy for several centuries.

Parts of the population boom in Eurasia supported by introduction of maize, potatoes and sweet potatoes do not happen, leaving Europe's and Asia's populations somewhat smaller than they would otherwise be. People like the Irish and Germans are also more vulnerable to war induced famine. However, the Americas remain far more populous.

Spain and China do not suffer from silver inflation. In Europe, the Balkans and Hungary may remain the main source of precious metals, with Siberia coming online later, and commanding correspondingly higher prices.

But nothing is slowing down the advance of printing technology in Europe. Nor military technology and associated metallurgy.

There would be attempts by northern Europeans to find a "northeast passage" leading to Anglo-Russian trade.

The Europeans don't have the precious metals to balance their trade with East Asia, leaving East Asian goods higher priced, and giving the Russians an advantage because at least the Chinese will trade for fur and horses. The Europeans can attempt to have sugar and spices as stopgaps. But China will soon be able to grow its own in the extreme south.

Meanwhile the Americas go on without horses, cattle, wheat, bronze or iron.

Can European capitalism still be developed, and, if so, how? Incremental increases in agricultural and metallurgical technology, small trade networks based on Asian luxuries, spices and sugar, but with primary trade commodities being grain, lumber, fish, furs, iron and eventually whale products and walrus ivory?

Germany would be more devastated and depopulated by any wars that occur. Ireland more depopulated and anglicized, all as a consequence of no potatoes.

The outright and inexplicable disappearance of Africa during this well-chronicled time will also throw a metaphysical spanner in the works, as the developing natural sciences will have to try to explain it or work around it. The situation will be somewhat similar in Africa, having to explain the disappearance of Eurasia and historic holy cities of Mecca, Medina, and Jerusalem.
 
Last edited:

WolfBear

Well-known member
Thinking much later here, but I wonder if an industrialized Japan in the 19th century or whenever would get to have an exclusive protectorate over all of Africa in this TL. After all, it will certainly have much less competition for this!
 

raharris1973

Well-known member
Thinking much later here, but I wonder if an industrialized Japan in the 19th century or whenever would get to have an exclusive protectorate over all of Africa in this TL. After all, it will certainly have much less competition for this!

Egypt will have had undisturbed generations to build itself up into a Nile Valley based superpower with Africa as its oyster in the meantime.
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
Egypt will have had undisturbed generations to build itself up into a Nile Valley based superpower with Africa as its oyster in the meantime.

But widespread cousin marriage will still be holding it back due to it lowering Egypt's average IQ, no?
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
FWIW, I think that the Egyptians can become a Great Power along the lines of the Ottoman Empire in this TL, but a superpower? I just don't know whether they'd actually be capable of this so long as they will continue to engage in widespread inbreeding.
 

ATP

Well-known member
FWIW, I think that the Egyptians can become a Great Power along the lines of the Ottoman Empire in this TL, but a superpower? I just don't know whether they'd actually be capable of this so long as they will continue to engage in widespread inbreeding.
They would still have greek population which do not inbreed.And was good sailors and merchants.
I see many Egypt-Carthage war over trade in the future,territories probably,too.
Could you imagine them fighting over Australia?
 

stevep

Well-known member
Some interesting ideas here. Not sure that Muslim slave operations in Africa would decline as the states in the north would be able to still raid up the Nile and down the east coast and as OTL probably deeper inland in the latter case. Also still going to be a trade across the Sahara, although likely to be markedly less in numbers.

Venice and the other Italian states would have powerful navies but they would have to adjust to the open seas, at least south of Sinai even if the ASB still keeps the Med reasonably calm so that would be an issue for them. However they can adapt, at least in the short term.

Otherwise looks very interesting and a hell of a lot can happen. As you say without the potato especially wars in Europe will be more destructive - or will have to be more limited earlier. There are still the incentives for considerable technological changes.

How religions in the assorted cultures explain the sudden disappearance of Africa is going to be a big factor as well. No well of telling how that will go.
 

Buba

A total creep
In 1415 the Ottomans were still a post-Ankara mess, with a lively ongoing Civil War, I believe. They are not even within sniffing distance of Syria. The success of the 1453 siege is not a given - and here might never happen.
Without Egypt to back them, the Syrian Mamluk garrisons can ascend to greatness or be wiped out by Timurids. Maybe new "crusades" and reestablished European presence?
AFAIK American silver gained in import post 1560 or so, most of the 16th century abundance of silver coming from new silver-lead mines in Germany, Czechia, Poland, Hungary ... it is the 17th that Mexican silver flooded the market.
 

stevep

Well-known member
In 1415 the Ottomans were still a post-Ankara mess, with a lively ongoing Civil War, I believe. They are not even within sniffing distance of Syria. The success of the 1453 siege is not a given - and here might never happen.
Without Egypt to back them, the Syrian Mamluk garrisons can ascend to greatness or be wiped out by Timurids. Maybe new "crusades" and reestablished European presence?
AFAIK American silver gained in import post 1560 or so, most of the 16th century abundance of silver coming from new silver-lead mines in Germany, Czechia, Poland, Hungary ... it is the 17th that Mexican silver flooded the market.

Actually by 1415 that crisis in the Ottoman empire was over, see Ottoman_Interregnum as the civil war ended in 1413. Its the Timurid's who suffered a civil war after Tamerlane's death in 1405. This ended in 1409 when his youngest son Shah_Rukh gained control of the bulk of the empire but that was largely in the east so not sure how significant a figure it was in the ME past this point.

The Levant Mamluks are likely to put up a fight but I would say the odds are against them. Ditto with Constantinople as that's virtually isolated although the date of its final fall may be a bit earlier or later.

Its possible that there might be new crusades although unless its butterflied Martin Luther is still likely within a couple of years to post his famous Theses about the corruption of the Papacy and the western churches are going to be somewhat distracted by the reformation as OTL.

Good point on the silver although gold was a factor earlier but that's still a century ahead. With a significantly latter discovery of the Americas and especially if Portugal has an earlier annexation by Castille/Spain [the latter may not form if Aragon stays independent due to butterflies] that would change both the politics and economy of Iberia. Think an isolated Grenada is likely to fall earlier but without N Africa where does this Iberian state look next? Back into Europe, toward eastern sea trade - possibly not without the Portuguese influence being so great - or into the Levant and holy lands?
 

stevep

Well-known member
Good catch - I thought they were at it until 1420 or so :)

I wasn't sure so I had to check, hence the wiki links. Also with the decline of the Timurid's. :)

In those periods apparently powerful states could rise and fall very quickly. Especially on the death of a very powerful founder.
 

Buba

A total creep
I took a look at the Mamluks and in this period commanders of forces in Syria have just overthrown the Gov't in Cairo and are running the show. High potential for the "stranded" Syrian Mamluks to go on an empire building spree. At the very least they create a state of their own. And with Damascus being much closer to Anatolia than Cairo they can be much more active players there. Unlike in OTL they do not need to worry about Egypt - neither as source of reinforcements nor a threat. Here a possible threat from that direction might be the Italian city states or maybe Crusaders.

A thought - how many lives and wealth - in the western Med basin in particular - is preserved by there not being any Barbary Coast pirates?

Yes, Granada should fall earlier. With no Moslem NA - maybe no expulsions, the Moors being ground down over the centuries - like Christians in the ME - with discrimination?
Maybe Portuguese prop up Granada, as counterweight to Castille? Maybe at some point the Emir will convert as to preserve his country?

Even if Dom Henrique V took all his sons - trueborn or bastard, even 13 y/o Fernando - to Ceuta, there are heirs. Either his daughter Infanta Isabel, 18, who here will not marry Phillipe the Good and will not pop out Charles the Bold, or his 13 year old grandson Afonso, by bastard son Afonso (yay for creativity!).
 
Last edited:

ATP

Well-known member
An ASB generated "event" on the night of August 15th, 1415, spatially displaces Africa and places it in the middle of the Pacific, swapping it with most of Polynesia (save New Zealand and Easter Island) and some of Melanesia, as shown in this map.

The ASB puts a climate preservation bubble over the planet that prevents drastic climate alterations or weather disasters beyond the range or suddenness of any experienced between 1415 AD and now.



[Yes, you may notice the ASB geographic intervention is basically identical to one I proposed in a different thread, the principle difference here is the very different timeframe, the time of the European renaissance and rising gunpowder empires of Ming China, the Muscovites, and Ottomans]

3 Worlds or More

Epilogue: 13 August 1415: Two nights before the "event", the King of Portugal his son Prince Henry, his other sons and a force of 45,000 seized the first Iberian colony in Africa, the coastal town of Ceuta in Morrocco.

The spent their post victory days celebrating and fortifying the newly captured town, and sending messengers back to Portugal with the good news.

Change dawns:

On the night 15 August, after feasting and drinking and setting up night watches and a majority of men behind the fortified lines have gone to sleep from either labor, drink or both, it is midnight.

In an instant, they are all woken up by the noon-day sun appearing at the top of the sky above them, as are everyone in the Moorish camps, and most of the human and animal inhabitants of the African continent.

When the next caravans of pilgrims, alternately destined for Mecca and Medina, and for Jerusalem, come eastbound from the Nile Delta cities to cross the Sinai, they find only shoreline, the Egyptian desert, and the Nile in every direction.

Meanwhile the next morning in contemporary Sinai, migrating Bedouin and traders bound for markets in the Nile Valley trying to cross the Suez isthmus find themselves traveling in circles, finding only shoreline, except when they backtrack from whence they came.

1415 - Immediate effects in Iberia:
In Europe, Portugal has lost its royal family and top nobility as of 1415. Portugal becomes ripe for Castilian intervention and probably takeover. The lost Portuguese royals include Henry the Navigator and many of his lieutenants who systematically organized and expanded knowledge of deep sea voyaging.

They are stranded in Ceuta Morocco, un-reinforceable, doomed to fall to siege to the Moors, with some able to escape on ships but certainly not all, in vessels of mixed seaworthiness, with no friendly European shores available, just hostile Muslim ones and unknown African ones. Except for shipwrecks and ruins and the occasional Robinson Crusoe-ish tale or captivity novel, the Portuguese conquerors of Ceuta dissolve in the mists of history.

For Europe, African products and gold become unavailable. Arabia is exposed to the open sea. Venetians plying the spice route run into open water west of Sinai.

Zheng He's contemporary voyage is probably already returning to China.

But, a later Zhenge HE voyage, covering comparable distances, will find no East Africa. This makes it more likely the next expedition, if it happens, will visit Mecca, from there, next logical place to visit is Jerusalem. The Chinese would probably meet Venetians there. The Europeans could form the opinion though that the Chinese are Muslim.

This motivates advance parties in the next Zheng He fleet to follow on to Constantinople and Italian cities like Venice and Rome before the end of the 1420s. For the Italians the visit of magnificent Chinese "treasure ships" validates the tales of the Polo family, and sparks a China fever, over the next century.

This continues, even when Ming China abandons treasure fleets and treasure fleet diplomacy. The Italian trading cities do trading and cartographic expeditions between the 1420s and 1470s to retrace Zheng He's steps, and gradually refine European, and West Asian knowledge of the southern coasts of Asia. While many missions fail or are denied landing or trade rights, the persistence of the Italian trading states keeps development of competing trade routes along the southern Asian coast alive over this period, and by 1500, you have Iberian states like Aragon, Castille, and Portugal joining in the competition, and France beginning to participate, and finally England.

Between 1415 and 1515, Eurasia is mapped from Portugal to Japan. The nearest islands of Polynesia are discovered by Portuguese & Castilian mariners, with them getting down possibly to New Caledonia--but no further in that direction. Although new currents need to be navigated nimbly, Castilians, Aragonese, French, English, Venetians, Genoans, Mamluks and Turks can all reach south and east Asia just by heading east around Arabia, not having to round Africa.


Depending how far they venture into the water, Aragonese may reach Samoa, Tonga or Fiji. The Venetians, plying the spice route will work on replacing their middlemen. They will probably discover Tahiti en route, west of the coast of Arabia.

Despite Venetian experience and positional advantage, no European or Middle Eastern country's trade path east can be monopolized or closed off by chokepoints.

Despite gradual expansion of fishing voyages, no European has sent an expedition to the Americans, or reported an accidental discovery, because no one is crossing south of the equator doing the volta do mar. In fact, many still believe it impossible. Sea-based trading over this time further marginalizes the steppe route. Venetians-Genoans-Pisans probably establish trading posts in India and the spice islands before other Europeans. All things being equal, the Chinese don't stop them.

They will not re-find Africa for a long time, although perhaps, before the Americas

Castille probably accelerates conquest of Granada, which has no close-by help. Expelled Jews and Moriscos do not have the Maghrib to go to. They have to go to other opportune places in Europe, the Ottoman territories, Levant, or points east. Expulsion might be somewhat less likely with both harder to find places to send them and less anxiety about close Muslim threat. But greed and status competition could still motivate it.

In 1500s or 1600s, Castilian, French and English monarchs probably stake their own claims in eastward bound trade routes.

Americas 1415-1615 -

I am anticipating the Americas are continuing to develop independently and undiscovered during these two centuries, which also means that the effects of their human depopulation and of the worldwide spread of their crops and precious metals are not felt during this time.

Impact on Muslim-Christian frontiers and slavery:

Turks are taking Constantinople at least on schedule, in my opinion. African slaves unavailable for court eunuchs. I suspect the Ottoman Turks will have an even easier time conquering the Mamluk Levant since it is separate from its Egyptian economic hinterland after 1415.

In southwest Asia, there is a long term demographic impact, less African genetic imprint (through the female line) on Ottoman Empire, demand for Balkan and Caucasian slaves is all the greater.

Europeans don't have to deal with Barbary pirates. Western Europeans on the Atlantic coast and Spanish and French Mediterranean are safer from slavers, although Ottomans could sponsor expeditions that hit Italy and Croatia hard.

Meanwhile, in Pacific Africa, the Mamelukes have lost their Levantine territories. They have lost their ability to replenish their ranks with Circassians or Turks. They have choices to make about how they replenish the Mamluk service - do they draw from desert Bedouin families or Arab fellahin farming families? Or stick with a model of recruiting foreign soldiers only. Do they possibly use Sub-Saharan Africa/Sudan as the new source of slave/warrior recruits?

For slaves or expansion, they can only go up the Nile. Likewise, the Maghreb states are safe from Christian attack, and have no one to raid. For slave labor they will have to reach up into sub-saharan Africa as well.

None of the Maghreb or West African cultures have strong long-range sea-faring traditions.

Pilgrimage becomes impossible for African Muslims. Egyptians find open water and the small Polynesian island of Rapa Iti to their east. Omanis in Zanzibar are used to longer distance travel, and will find they can easily access Egypt and the Maghreb. They have a chance, but only a slim one, of finding Peru or the west coast of Mesoamerica.

"North African" demand for slave labor can only be met within the continent, which perhaps leads to a short term increase in enslavement, but over the longer run, by the late 1500s and 1600s there is no slave trade with Europeans or plantation system, leaving Africa more populous and without slave trade motivated conquest.

Africa has become its own world, separate from America, and now, separate from Europe and Asia as well.

There is no old world-new world exchange of diseases and crops and animals. No potatoes, tomatoes, chocolate or possibly even coffee. Spices are the big trade product, and sugar is the only plantation crop, and it's available in less quantity. The persistence of coffee depends on how many bushes were in gardens in southwest Asia (like Yemen) at this time.
The continents will be reunited at some point, though it's uncertain if Africa will be rediscovered before the Americas are discovered.

Also, the changed geography means that South America will likely be the last discovered continent in the world (except Antarctica). North America will be discovered via northern routes, with the question being whether there is more impetus from fishermen and later fur trappers from northwest Europe, or from Russian fur trappers crossing the Bering strait.

Ming Dynasty Chinese would have ability to journey to Africa and back, but they are unlikely to believe there is anything interesting worth looking for.

This prolonged separation of the African, American and Eurasian worlds means that gold and silver are scarcer in the Eurasian economy for several centuries.

Parts of the population boom in Eurasia supported by introduction of maize, potatoes and sweet potatoes do not happen, leaving Europe's and Asia's populations somewhat smaller than they would otherwise be. People like the Irish and Germans are also more vulnerable to war induced famine. However, the Americas remain far more populous.

Spain and China do not suffer from silver inflation. In Europe, the Balkans and Hungary may remain the main source of precious metals, with Siberia coming online later, and commanding correspondingly higher prices.

But nothing is slowing down the advance of printing technology in Europe. Nor military technology and associated metallurgy.

There would be attempts by northern Europeans to find a "northeast passage" leading to Anglo-Russian trade.

The Europeans don't have the precious metals to balance their trade with East Asia, leaving East Asian goods higher priced, and giving the Russians an advantage because at least the Chinese will trade for fur and horses. The Europeans can attempt to have sugar and spices as stopgaps. But China will soon be able to grow its own in the extreme south.

Meanwhile the Americas go on without horses, cattle, wheat, bronze or iron.

Can European capitalism still be developed, and, if so, how? Incremental increases in agricultural and metallurgical technology, small trade networks based on Asian luxuries, spices and sugar, but with primary trade commodities being grain, lumber, fish, furs, iron and eventually whale products and walrus ivory?

Germany would be more devastated and depopulated by any wars that occur. Ireland more depopulated and anglicized, all as a consequence of no potatoes.

The outright and inexplicable disappearance of Africa during this well-chronicled time will also throw a metaphysical spanner in the works, as the developing natural sciences will have to try to explain it or work around it. The situation will be somewhat similar in Africa, having to explain the disappearance of Eurasia and historic holy cities of Mecca, Medina, and Jerusalem.


I have two thing to add-
1.Both Aztec and Inkas empires was disasters - it would implode before 1615,and whatever found America would must fight many kngdoms,not taking easily 2 stupid empires.
/Incas - they need court for every dead Inca,but there was no countries which could be easily conqered and made profit.So,when it would be no resources for dead ancestors,we have cyvil war and return to small kingdoms
Aztecs - idiots fight to take others alive,when their neighbours arleady started fight to kill.They are doomed.

2.Poland fell becouse of our magnats - but,it happened also becouse King have little gold.We have goldmines,but when Spain discovered americas it lost 80% of its value in less then 100 years.
Now,polish kings would still have that gold till 1615.
It coud save Poland from fall.
 

stevep

Well-known member
I took a look at the Mamluks and in this period commanders of forces in Syria have just overthrown the Gov't in Cairo and are running the show. High potential for the "stranded" Syrian Mamluks to go on an empire building spree. At the very least they create a state of their own. And with Damascus being much closer to Anatolia than Cairo they can be much more active players there. Unlike in OTL they do not need to worry about Egypt - neither as source of reinforcements nor a threat. Here a possible threat from that direction might be the Italian city states or maybe Crusaders.

A thought - how many lives and wealth - in the western Med basin in particular - is preserved by there not being any Barbary Coast pirates?

Yes, Granada should fall earlier. With no Moslem NA - maybe no expulsions, the Moors being ground down over the centuries - like Christians in the ME - with discrimination?
Maybe Portuguese prop up Granada, as counterweight to Castille? Maybe at some point the Emir will convert as to preserve his country?

Even if Dom Henrique V took all his sons - trueborn or bastard, even 13 y/o Fernando - to Ceuta, there are heirs. Either his daughter Infanta Isabel, 18, who here will not marry Phillipe the Good and will not pop out Charles the Bold, or his 13 year old grandson Afonso, by bastard son Afonso (yay for creativity!).

Good point about the Syrian Mamluks. [Haven't really read up on them for decades!]. They might still well be a substantial force in the region. Especially probably if they can still recruit new soldier slaves from the Caucasus region. I would still expect the Ottomans to win in the end because they will simply have so much power. Mind you with the new geography could Syria possibly get a leg up on sea-trade to the east and possibly boost its economy as a result?

The disappearance of the Barbary pirates will save a lot of people. They raided as far as Iceland OTL causing the devastation and depopulation of many coastal settlements. Likely to still be other Muslim sea raiders but then the Christians had their own with the Hospitaller Knights being established in Rhodes by this time. They definitely wouldn't be attacked from Egypt TTL although will still be a target for the Ottomans.

Likely that the future for the Muslims and probably also Jews of Grenada will be worse than OTL with no easy refuge to the south. Will depend on how things go. Spain - if a unified state still occurs - could have less of a future than OTL. Its a good distance from the new routes to the east which the Italians states could have an early advantage in and is unlikely to be developing a vast empire in the west in the near future. However this could make it a more active player in western Europe with clashes with France say a bit earlier.

Portugal could survive but the dynasty has taken a blow and everybody will be reeling from the sudden disappearance of all of Africa which could cause a period of turmoil.
 

Buba

A total creep
could Syria possibly get a leg up on sea-trade to the east and possibly boost its economy as a result?
Yes, Syria could benefit from the new sea routes as much if not more than Italians.
It also might benefit from a wetter climate.

Europeans will notice the dissapearance of NA and Egypt only. The Arab perspective will be minimally broader - i.e. they will notice the east coast down to Mozambique going POOF!
 
Last edited:

raharris1973

Well-known member
They would still have greek population which do not inbreed.And was good sailors and merchants.
I see many Egypt-Carthage war over trade in the future,territories probably,too.
Could you imagine them fighting over Australia?

Your reference to Carthage and a Carthage-Egypt war makes me think your comment belongs in my other, similar thread on this premise that takes places over 100 years BC, and not after 1400 AD
 

raharris1973

Well-known member
FWIW, I think that the Egyptians can become a Great Power along the lines of the Ottoman Empire in this TL, but a superpower? I just don't know whether they'd actually be capable of this so long as they will continue to engage in widespread inbreeding.

At the leadership and military levels this wasn't a problem for the Mamluks, because they were imported slave-soldiers, and so definitionally, 'new blood'. Theoretically it could be a drag on surrounding society, or at least its cohesiveness beyond a clannish level.

And as I hinted above, the Mamluk system of Egypt is abruptly cut off from its old sourcing grounds in the Caucasus, so it will have to recruit slave soldiers, or free soldiers, from elsewhere now. Raising free soldiers locally means soldiers with clan connections and loyalties.

Also, whatever drawbacks cousin marriage customs of whatever kind are practiced in Egypt may have, they don't stop a steady flow of production of educated, even over-educated Egyptians, for Egypt, in the 20th and 21st century world, with many left over to spare to migrate to the Persian Gulf and the west professionally, with their children often statistically being more willing to take on, and pass, harder courses of study in engineering, STEM, and medicine, than native westerners. Producing intelligent and educated individuals isn't a fundamental problem for Egypt, it's setting up a system for the intelligent, educated, and ambitious to be able to coexist and forward national development within the country that's been the problem they haven't solved. Egypt may have some problems in that there could be too much of a differential between courses of study and economic activities considered socially desirable and prestigious, and those which would fill useful niches in the Egyptian market economy. East and Southeast Asian countries may have gotten over this problem a little more by relaxing their pride a little bit and saying more often, 'fuck it, if it makes money, if it's profitable, it's prestigious enough for me'.
 

raharris1973

Well-known member
In 1415 the Ottomans were still a post-Ankara mess, with a lively ongoing Civil War, I believe. They are not even within sniffing distance of Syria.

Getting out of the post-Ankara mess, as shown. Maybe not in sniffing distance of Syria, yet, but that's a short term problem.

The success of the 1453 siege is not a given - and here might never happen.

I think it pretty much is. By 1415 the Ottomans seem to have the city well surrounded and have a robust domain in western Turkey and the southern Balkans:



Without Egypt to back them, the Syrian Mamluk garrisons can ascend to greatness or be wiped out by Timurids. Maybe new "crusades" and reestablished European presence?

Possibly - I would call the new Crusades idea fairly unlikely. Or highly fragile and endangered with extinction by Timurid or later Turkish forces, possibly augmented by Omani seapower.

AFAIK American silver gained in import post 1560 or so, most of the 16th century abundance of silver coming from new silver-lead mines in Germany, Czechia, Poland, Hungary ... it is the 17th that Mexican silver flooded the market.

Yes so those Central Europeans will be the countries paying for the Far East trade, importing Chinese Ming vases (literally) and other Chinoiseries, getting translations of Confucius printed, adding some Far Eastern spices to goulash, etc.
 

WolfBear

Well-known member
Possibly - I would call the new Crusades idea fairly unlikely. Or highly fragile and endangered with extinction by Timurid or later Turkish forces, possibly augmented by Omani seapower.

If Henry V of England will live significantly longer in this TL due to butterflies, then might he himself eventually decide to participate in any new Crusade to protect the Byzantine Empire and/or to retake Jerusalem? After he's finished conquering France and snuffing out French resistance to his rule, I mean.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top