• The Sietch will be brought offline for HPG systems maintenance tomorrow (Thursday, 2 May 2024). Please remain calm and do not start any interstellar wars while ComStar is busy. May the Peace of Blake be with you. Precentor Dune

Five minutes of hate news

DarthOne

☦️
While ewhores are a problem. banning cameras is its own can of worms.
Overall cameras have been a good thing. Lot of cops got caught being outright criminal thanks to cameras everywhere.

We are talking about banning them from gyms, or at least work-out areas. Though I’d say that if you really want to solve the problem long-term, you need a cultural change.
 

DarthOne

☦️
Relevant video is relevant:



Gym thots/ ‘influencers’ are narcissistic and they’re getting worse. And plenty of examples of this, alongside other fatherless behavior.

Schrödinger's feminism: a woman is simultaneously a victim and empowered, until something happens. Then she chooses which state benefits her the most.
 
Last edited:

King Arts

Well-known member
You clearly have not met or dated a lady or woman from North Africa.
I know muzzies have an honor killing thing but that is Arab culture not Islam specifically.


This post on this site explains what I think is going on in the Arab mind. See Muslim Arabs can accept sluts or whores, the punishment is relatively mild lashing not death. The thing is those type of women and their families are lower class. So Arab machismo comes in and they have an ego to think they are better than they really are.

The problem also lies with westerners because they believe in a false doctrine created 300 years ago of equality. This can’t keep going and either inequality or a brutal police state is the only solution.
 

King Arts

Well-known member
Huh? Define this please.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

That passage by itself in our collective unconscious is an advocation of equality, it makes it so that we don't believe in superiors and inferiors. We hold all people all citizens to be equal. So we can't really have certain people be put down, even if that might be necessary to tame the pride of the migrants who come here.

For instance our culture would balk at doing things like requiring all migrants to kowtow to any passing native born citizen or things like that. Now I know you might be thinking such a thing is merely to sooth the ego of the locals so they can pretend to be superior. And sometimes it is that, and it's useless. But other times it proves handy to control a rebellious new group of people in your nation.
 

The Whispering Monk

Well-known member
Osaul
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

That passage by itself in our collective unconscious is an advocation of equality, it makes it so that we don't believe in superiors and inferiors. We hold all people all citizens to be equal. So we can't really have certain people be put down, even if that might be necessary to tame the pride of the migrants who come here.

For instance our culture would balk at doing things like requiring all migrants to kowtow to any passing native born citizen or things like that. Now I know you might be thinking such a thing is merely to sooth the ego of the locals so they can pretend to be superior. And sometimes it is that, and it's useless. But other times it proves handy to control a rebellious new group of people in your nation.
Your entire 2nd paragraph is false. It's the lie the Left has been spreading for a century and more.

We can absolutely determine that immigrants aren't worth our time and shut our borders to them. We've done it before to ensure what we've taken in has time to assimilate to our culture and away from their old ones.
 

DarthOne

☦️
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

That passage by itself in our collective unconscious is an advocation of equality, it makes it so that we don't believe in superiors and inferiors. We hold all people all citizens to be equal. So we can't really have certain people be put down, even if that might be necessary to tame the pride of the migrants who come here.

For instance our culture would balk at doing things like requiring all migrants to kowtow to any passing native born citizen or things like that. Now I know you might be thinking such a thing is merely to sooth the ego of the locals so they can pretend to be superior. And sometimes it is that, and it's useless. But other times it proves handy to control a rebellious new group of people in your nation.

In the context it was talking about equal before the law and before God. No ‘divine right of human kings’ to do whatever they wanted and get away with it because they are the king.
 

King Arts

Well-known member
Your entire 2nd paragraph is false. It's the lie the Left has been spreading for a century and more.

We can absolutely determine that immigrants aren't worth our time and shut our borders to them. We've done it before to ensure what we've taken in has time to assimilate to our culture and away from their old ones.
Yes if we are able to prevent migrants from coming here in the first place it will work ok. But we haven't been able to stop that have we?

In the context it was talking about equal before the law and before God. No ‘divine right of human kings’ to do whatever they wanted and get away with it because they are the king.
I can agree on equality before God, and believe me I believe that the divine right of kings is heretical.

But equality before the law of all people can be a big shackle. I mean imagine it what if we were able to have laws that protect citizens. Think of it as a kind of reverse hate crime law. So that if a citizen unjustly harms a migrant the evil citizen is given a regular punishment. But if a migrant does a crime that harms a local citizen, then he gets a much more severe punishment.
Think of the story of Vlad the Impaler and the golden goblet.

Are you saying something like that would not help maybe prevent the chaos and stuff like no go zones and would actually make migrants behave? I think that would create less crime but it also goes against enlightenment values.
 

mrttao

Well-known member
Yes if we are able to prevent migrants from coming here in the first place it will work ok. But we haven't been able to stop that have we?


I can agree on equality before God, and believe me I believe that the divine right of kings is heretical.

But equality before the law of all people can be a big shackle. I mean imagine it what if we were able to have laws that protect citizens. Think of it as a kind of reverse hate crime law. So that if a citizen unjustly harms a migrant the evil citizen is given a regular punishment. But if a migrant does a crime that harms a local citizen, then he gets a much more severe punishment.
Think of the story of Vlad the Impaler and the golden goblet.

Are you saying something like that would not help maybe prevent the chaos and stuff like no go zones and would actually make migrants behave? I think that would create less crime but it also goes against enlightenment values.
1. not having equality before the law just means more blatant abuse by the aristocracy. because it won't be protecting commoners from foreigners, it will be letting aristocrats walk all over commons.

2. just close the borders. boom, problem solved.
 

Rocinante

Russian Bot
Founder
While ewhores are a problem. banning cameras is its own can of worms.
Overall cameras have been a good thing. Lot of cops got caught being outright criminal thanks to cameras everywhere.
I mean people bringing cameras into gyms to record their workouts.
 

King Arts

Well-known member
We've got to get the WILL to do it. That means enough people to push the ticks to make those decisions.
But again that does not solve the problem of disloyal citizens/locals who are sabatoging the nation by supporting the mass immigration.

1. not having equality before the law just means more blatant abuse by the aristocracy. because it won't be protecting commoners from foreigners, it will be letting aristocrats walk all over commons.

2. just close the borders. boom, problem solved.
1. Well yes it could but at that point the question is who is the aristocracy. If the locals aka citizens are the aristocracy, and the migrants are commoners it might not be too bad.

2. The problem is getting the power to do it. If we could close the borders and arrest those who try to open them it could work but enlightenment thought would be opposed to restricting free speech like that.
 

DarthOne

☦️
But again that does not solve the problem of disloyal citizens/locals who are sabatoging the nation by supporting the mass immigration.

That is an issue. For a long term solution, one needs to undermine the whole ‘the USA is a nation of immigration’ nonsense. Hammer home how that’s not true, why the large scale immigration did happen (the USA had plenty of land) and bring up how we had harsh restrictions on letting people in.

Short term, I’d say the whole ‘shipping migrants to blue states’ tactic has helped wake people up once they’ve had to deal with them and their crimes. Also, bombard people with the issues, crimes and downsides such people bring.
2. The problem is getting the power to do it. If we could close the borders and arrest those who try to open them it could work but enlightenment thought would be opposed to restricting free speech like that.
Despite what people will tell you, it hasn’t stopped us before. From both the government, or private citizens from get fed up with someone else’s nonsense and punching them in the face.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top