Nuclear Energy Thread.

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
Former SpaceX engineers who founded a startup called Radiant are working on a portable microreactor which is an outgrowth of their work with SpaceX in researching ways to power a potential Mars Colony.

Interesting Engineering said:
Radiant announced last year that it had received two provisional patents for its portable nuclear reactor technology. One of these was for a technology that reduces the cost and the time needed to refuel their reactor, while the other improves efficiency in heat transference from the reactor core. The microreactor will use an advanced particle fuel that does not melt down and is capable of withstanding higher temperatures than traditional nuclear fuels. Helium coolant, meanwhile, reduces the corrosion and contamination risks associated with traditional water coolant. Radiant has signed a contract with Battelle Energy Alliance to test its portable microreactor technology at its Idaho National Laboratory (INL).

 
This is a thread for all talk concerning Nuclear Energy and it's uses and controversies!

To start with I saw this great youtube video today concerning nuclear powered commercial ships which was interesting as it showed the overall difficulties both within and without concerning vessel operation.
 


This has been the company/start up I've kept my eyes on for SMRs. Their design has few moving parts in the reactor itself, relying on heat convection, pressure, and gravity to operate the primary coolant loop.

Currently their cores only last a few years, so a lot more refueling happens more often; however that is a issue they are working on.
 
This has been the company/start up I've kept my eyes on for SMRs. Their design has few moving parts in the reactor itself, relying on heat convection, pressure, and gravity to operate the primary coolant loop.

Currently their cores only last a few years, so a lot more refueling happens more often; however that is a issue they are working on.
Sounds like some interesting stuff. Still won't go anywhere, I'd say.

NIMBY's and Greens are still way too powerful. It's deeply stupid, but that's what seems to be the state of things.
 
Sounds like some interesting stuff. Still won't go anywhere, I'd say.

NIMBY's and Greens are still way too powerful. It's deeply stupid, but that's what seems to be the state of things.
"Do you want heat in the winter?"
"Do you want AC in the summer?"
"Would you like your hospitals to have power all year round...every day...every hour?"

Pretty simple way to get them on board.
 
"Do you want heat in the winter?"
"Do you want AC in the summer?"
"Would you like your hospitals to have power all year round...every day...every hour?"

Pretty simple way to get them on board.
I've actually been told by Greens that heating and air-conditioning are bad because they promote whiteness, blah blah blah.

I personally believe that any environmentalist who isn't 100% behind safe nuclear power is either a blithering idiot or a watermelon.
 
All of a sudden, I’m thinking that maybe nuclear energy would be more preferable to natural gas, although Greta types might scream bloody murder at the idea of nuclear energy being the replacement as well.
In terms of minizing overall environmental impact it's hard to top nuclear.

Unfortunately radiation is scary along with being misunderstood by "no way, no how, no hell" NIMBY's who would be absolutely apoplectic upon discovering that ionization smoke detectors - like the one in their home - contain radioactive material extracted from nuclear waste.
 
We may also want to look into recycling nuclear waste to see if it can be enriched and used again. Also, there is Thorium. It has less direct military applications.

Of course, if you want to make the Greens turn green...ask them what Solar power is, ask What is a Star?
 
We may also want to look into recycling nuclear waste to see if it can be enriched and used again.
We already do reprocess some nuclear waste, but doing so is neither cheap, nor easy, nor quick.

Once-through, then stuffing it somewhere secure to be dealt with "later" after maybe extracting the comercially and scientifically useful isotopes is usually cheaper.
 


At least Japan is being smart about restarting reactors, unlike Germany who shut their down but is reopening coal plants.

Japan may go for coal as well.

This was something I didn't expect Kishida would do - his constituency is in Hiroshima.
 

For some reason this isn't getting nearly the acclaim it deserves.
 

For some reason this isn't getting nearly the acclaim it deserves.
Maybe we can have nice things after all.
 
Apparently there's a World Nuclear Energy Day and it is... Actually it was yesterday. December 2nd. On the anniversary of Enrico Fermi's self sustaining chain reaction at a commercial scale electric power reactor, the Chicago Pile-1 on December 2nd, 1942.

Yesterday was the fourth annual World Nuclear Energy Day.



Wow some random internet nuclear energy influencer (I guess that's a thing) even got to speak to the Prime Minister of le France about Nuclear Energy.


At COP 28 (The World Climate Action Summit) in Dubai (where all international events concerning climate change and energy policy take place apparently) around twenty nations pledged to tripling global nuclear energy production by 2050. While the overarching reason for it at the Summit is to pursue a carbon neutral energy policy, nuclear energy development and production is a good thing in general regardless. The countries that made the pledge are United States, Bulgaria, Canada, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Ghana, Hungary, Japan, Republic of Korea, Moldova, Mongolia, Morocco, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, and the United Kingdom.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top