PsihoKekec
Swashbuckling Accountant
Anybody can stop being a bad person if they prostrate themselves before him and submit themselves to his superior transcendent mind.
No, you just say that your a libertarian socialist. But socialists also almost universally lie about that as well so there's a very good chance of you doing that; and it's just a case of doing the math. There has never been a Libertarian socialist state ever, and socialist states always become authoritarian. So realistically you present a clear danger to everyone in your nation by spouting off about socialism because the system you advocate almost always kills hundreds of thousands to millions and then implodes.Authoritarians always end up creating horrible oppressive violent and ultimately self destructive states. You do understand the difference between an authoritarian and a libertarian? I know you very badly want it to be true that Authoritarianism is inherent to socialism. But given that you cannot define authoritarianism i understand that you don't understand how it's possible to have two radically different and competing schools of socialism. It's also understandable how you don't possibly see how authoritarians would be willing to take steps that libertarians are not. Or how the fact that authoritarians are willing to employ liberal uses of violence might mean that it is easier for them to establish states than those who are not willing to apply such liberal uses.
Ironically the Nazis would have probably been okay with him. If half his grand parents were white then he would just eke being removed from a kill list.who the hell still uses the term Octoroon?
Litterally no one here care's who your great grandparents were, this website is composed of people from all walks of life, it has gay people, strait people, bisexuals. We have people of all races, religions and nationality. You stand or fall on this site based on your own merits and not based on who your related to.
For any group that conservatives supposedly hate or want to oppress, there are members of that group here who are fully respected Sietch members.who the hell still uses the term Octoroon?
Litterally no one here care's who your great grandparents were, this website is composed of people from all walks of life, it has gay people, strait people, bisexuals. We have people of all races, religions and nationality. You stand or fall on this site based on your own merits and not based on who your related to.
I provided Umberto's 14 traits because you made the very stupid claim that the definition for socialism was specific and the definition for Nazism was vague. Nazism politically is defined as racial fascism. Thus I provided Umberto's 14 traits to counter your very stupid claim. I have a very specific meaning in mind when I call someone either a fascist or a Nazi.
No, you just say that your a libertarian socialist. But socialists also almost universally lie about that as well so there's a very good chance of you doing that; and it's just a case of doing the math. There has never been a Libertarian socialist state ever, and socialist states always become authoritarian. So realistically you present a clear danger to everyone in your nation by spouting off about socialism because the system you advocate almost always kills hundreds of thousands to millions and then implodes.
Why shouldn't you be put against the wall as a political danger same as a 'Nazi'? Or hell ahead of the Nazi! If you're adamant that the Nazis aren't socialist then all we have to fall back on is the SSR, China and the other socialist nations which were and are killing far more people and acting as global threats. If we're allowing political violence to 'protect' people then commies, socialists and other groups that result in anti freedom and loss of life should be the first to get the old short drop and sudden stop on account of producing inherently destructive systems regardless of what they say the intend. Needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. Sorry mate.
I didn't even want to get into the entire argument about how leftists control entertainment because they're just so awesome and their art is so wonderful. I could bring up Star Wars, which is a very conservative franchise to start and then the left demolish the IP with their woke movies.Also lol at the idea that "reactionaries" as Dirtbag defines it have created nothing of value in the arts. We literally have the world's top bestseller ever - if that isn't an achievement, nothing is!
I didn't even want to get into the entire argument about how leftists control entertainment because they're just so awesome and their art is so wonderful. I could bring up Star Wars, which is a very conservative franchise to start and then the left demolish the IP with their woke movies.
Fuck's sake, we had dissertations about the religious basis for respecting transgenderism from a literal monarchist. This place is not a home of stereotypes.
Also, I consider transgenderism a mental illness specifically because I see "bottom surgery" as something that isn't pointless. Because there are cases in need of invasive medical attention like that, I view the phenomenon as an illness. There's no need for surgical treatment of homosexuality, nor does any race have a universal need of such things.
That particular statement made it clear to me that you're just applying your totem of reactionary to everyone else in the thread, not actually responding to the nature of what is said.
Edit: Here's the thread on trans rights, if you're actually interested in going over the site's views.
While I don't have time to answer in full no let me address this. I am going to deal with the more absurd aspect first and then I will address the spirit. I tend towards yes. (you at the very least cannot claim I am inconsistent. It would be a really really bad idea optically but ya.
Yes among other things I do have a text document with umberto echo's 14 traits. I also have the BITE Model and a whole lot of other things which considering the spectrum of conversations I have should come as no surprise. Should I perhaps come up with my own unique list? Should everyone come up with their own unique lists such that each list is different and attempting to determine if someone is a fascist is highly dependent upon each individual? That would seem to me to be a good way to make the term fascist become useless.
I posted it because you have pinged rather hard several of the traits but the one you ping most often is newspeak.
Wait 'JQNazis? Does that not imply that there are non JQ Nazis? Like Nazis that don't hate the jew?
JQ the 'The Jewish Question'. Pretty sure if you're fine with jews then by definition you aren't aNaziWait, that's what it means? I thought it was some weird corruption of "Just Asking Questions", I've seen that get abbreviated to JAQ a fair bit and figured he maybe dropped a letter.
To be fair, The Little Red Book greatly exceeds Lord of the Rings in sales so there's that.Also lol at the idea that "reactionaries" as Dirtbag defines it have created nothing of value in the arts. We literally have the world's top bestseller ever - if that isn't an achievement, nothing is!
JQ the 'The Jewish Question'. Pretty sure if you're fine with jews then by definition you aren't aNazi
It implies that there are Nazis who aren't up for the Jewish Question, which means he either doesn't know what a Nazi is or doesn't care and uses the word as a rhetorical weapon.Isn't calling them "Jewish Question Nazis" both grammatically nonsensical and redundant?