The Americas The Tyranny of Trudeau's Canada

[DarthOne]

You guys are getting included in that, also keep in mind you have large scale ranchers and farmers who would also be pissed off by this. Fucking with peoples food is one of those things that just pissess off large scales of people.

And yet here we are.

 

[Cherico]

And yet here we are.

yeah this is the height of their power and legitimacy and yet you already see the populist back lash starting pretty much everywhere in the west. You see it in europe you see it in south america and you see it up here. Its going to be a long conflict but the fight has already started.

 

[DarthOne]

yeah this is the height of their power and legitimacy and yet you already see the populist back lash starting pretty much everywhere in the west. You see it in europe you see it in south america and you see it up here. Its going to be a long conflict but the fight has already started.

So you’ve said for a while now, more or less. And by the time your long conflict is done it will be too late. The peoples of Europe and America will be replaced and at least a generation will have grown up under their bullshit.

 

[mrttao]

Insects are not koshure.

Didn't Trudeo just come out in support of Palestine?
Looks like the Golem is rising up on its creator yet again.

Unfortunately the guilty banker jews are on a plane to the next country they will rape, while the commoner working class jews stay behind to face the blame.

Although admittedly they carry some blame for blindly supporting the jewish aristocracy under the mistaken assumption that they are their allies.
We desperately need to clean house.

 

[stephen the barbarian]

Alberta invokes Sovereignty Act over federal clean electricity regulations

The resolution, tabled in the Alberta legislature Monday, instructs governments and provincial entities such as the Alberta Electric System Operator and the Alberta Utilities Commission to ignore the regulations when they come into force "to the extent legally permissable."

The resolution also raises the possibility of Alberta setting up a Crown corporation to protect the private sector companies that provide electricity in the province. If passed, the resolution would direct AESO, AUC and the Market Surveillance Administrator to consult with stakeholders on the feasibility of such a corporation.

The Clean Electricity Regulations, currently in draft form, lay out the rules for getting Canada's electricity grid to net zero emissions by 2035.

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith says the deadline is impossible for the province to meet without risking blackouts and high costs for consumers.

The government says investors are afraid of proposing new power generation projects in light of the CER. The Crown corporation could commission new natural gas-fired plants, make deals for small-scale nuclear reactors or buy existing gas-fired plants.

 

[Cherico]

Id like to note that succession is legal in canada, Albertia can save themselves at anytime by just leaving.

 

[TheRomanSlayer]

Id like to note that succession is legal in canada, Albertia can save themselves at anytime by just leaving.

The Clarity Act would be the case, although given Quebec's attempt at separating in 1995 that ended in failure, I'm not sure how successful would this be. Yet, if Saskatchewan could also join in the separation gravy train, then things could get more interesting. BC however, would probably be affected by the fact that if AB and SK seceded, we'd be cut off from the rest of Canada.

 

[49ersfootball]

Klaus Schwab. Leader of the World Economic Forum, the organization behind this bullshit and so much more.

That uppity piece of shit!

 

[49ersfootball]

Id like to note that succession is legal in canada, Albertia can save themselves at anytime by just leaving.

Now what could possibly go wrong if Alberta goes full-ahead by going independent & becoming an independent nation

 

[TheRomanSlayer]

Now what could possibly go wrong if Alberta goes full-ahead by going independent & becoming an independent nation

Trudeau trying to send troops to stop AB from separating? Or it might lose its ability to trade with the rest of Canada? Although they may be able to make it up by expanding their trade with the US.

 

[King Arts]

My people have lawyers Darth and lots of them.

These people aren’t Jews cherico and if some of these oligarchs DO have Jewish ancestry that doesn’t mean they actually respect or believe the religion sure eating insects is a violation of Jewish laws, but the same applies to homosexual behavior, yet they still support it even though the books given to Moses prohibit it.

 

[DarthOne]

Canadian Human Rights Commission Labels Christmas Celebration "Discrimination Grounded In Colonialism"

Canadian Human Rights Commission Labels Christmas Celebration “Discrimination Grounded In Colonialism” | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

The cancerous spread of woke ideology into every facet of society and government is more obvious in some places compared to others, but every so often the movement crosses a line and sparks considerable opposition. In the US, the social justice movement seems to have hit a few snags; numerous companies adopting and promoting ESG related propaganda have been pummeled with successful boycotts, losing billions in profits and in stock value. Overall public sentiment is quickly turning against major universities as a root source of woke beliefs. And, government officials pandering to the extreme left are confronted with increasing vitriol from the populace.

It would seem that Canadians are also hitting their limit these days when it comes to the far-left, and it took a thinly veiled attack on Christmas to do it.

Part of the ongoing invasion of the woke movement involves regular attempts to undermine Christian holidays as "problematic" and archaic. Leftists argue that increasing diversity (mostly through open border policies or illegal immigration) requires increasing inclusion at the national level. Meaning, it is not for immigrants to adapt to the west, the west must adapt to them. National celebrations like Christmas are therefore a representation of "discrimination" because they are being given preference over minority holidays.

This was the message given by the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) in a paper published under the radar in October. The treatise on "Religious Intolerance" was then condemned in a motion unanimously adopted on Nov. 30 by the House of Commons, the lower chamber of the Canadian Parliament. The paper cited Christianity's two biggest holy days (Christmas and Easter) as examples of "present-day systemic religious discrimination" linked to colonialism because they are statutory holidays in Canada.

The CHRC was established by the Canadian government in 1977 and claims to be an "independent" watchdog. It is empowered under the Canadian Human Rights Act to investigate and to settle complaints of discrimination in employment and in the provision of services within federal jurisdiction. The group is similar to the ACLU in that its momentum is ever to the deepest reaches of the political left. Their ideological positions carry weight in the higher echelons of government; for example, their paper attacking Christmas has since been avidly defended by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

The woke all-or-nothing argument against state recognized religious holidays is built on a host of illogical demands. First and foremost, Canada is a majority Christian nation, with 53.3% of the population identifying as Christian, 34.6% identifying as non-affiliated, and around 12% identifying with several other faiths. The next largest religious group in Canada is Muslim, representing only 5% of the religious population.

But what about that 34% of people who are non-affiliated? Do they feel discriminated against by national Christmas celebrations? No, not really.

Surveys show the vast majority of Canadians have no ill feelings towards Christmas revelry. In a poll asking average Canadians if seasons greetings of "Merry Christmas" bother them during the holidays or if people should use the more inclusive "Happy Holidays", 52% said they don't care either way. Over 32% said they prefer Merry Christmas, while only 16% of the public preferred the progressive "Happy Holidays."

Why should a majority Christian country worry about adopting every single minority celebration as a national holiday? No Muslim nation does this. No Hindu nation does this. No Buddhist nation does this. Israel doesn't do it. Why should western nations be expected to do it?

The woke establishment effort to gratify minority concerns over all others stems from the illusion of equity – The false narrative that equal opportunity is not enough, and that equal outcomes must be codified. However, in any society where certain belief systems are the norm and have been since the the society was founded, it is not only naive to expect that country to bend to minority beliefs, it's dangerously delusional.

Religious freedom does not mean religious equity – There simply is no such thing. But the CHRC doesn't see it that way. They suggest that the existence of a western religious majority is in itself a form of racism. In other words, they expect western systems to self destruct so that foreign and minority philosophies can be accommodated. If the roles were reversed and Muslims were the majority in Canada with widely recognized Muslim holidays, it's unlikely the commission would be making the same argument. And, it is this double standard, the pervasive bias against the west just under the surface, that makes the public not trust woke ideologues.

This is why you don't let Leftists into the government.

Also, I think this comment is correct when it comes to who else is to blame.

The problem is we are full of Muslims. They scream that they are being discriminated against while committing crimes non stop and feeding off our taxes.

They work cash jobs, consume all government aid, and scream that all other religions are racist against them.

 

[Cherico]

Canadian Human Rights Commission Labels Christmas Celebration "Discrimination Grounded In Colonialism"

Canadian Human Rights Commission Labels Christmas Celebration “Discrimination Grounded In Colonialism” | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

This is why you don't let Leftists into the government.

Also, I think this comment is correct when it comes to who else is to blame.

governments have been overthrown for less.

 

[DarthOne]

governments have been overthrown for less.

Better be sooner then later at this rate.

 

[The Whispering Monk]

I mean...don't forget that Canadian forces were the reason for a lot 'war crimes' were agreed upon after WWI.

If the populace goes off in America's Hat...the people currently in charge may greatly regret their decision...for however long that lasts.

 

[DarthOne]

I mean...don't forget that Canadian forces were the reason for a lot 'war crimes' were agreed upon after WWI.

If the populace goes off in America's Hat...the people currently in charge may greatly regret their decision...for however long that lasts.

Will they be able to though? And will they stand up?

 

[Cherico]

Will they be able to though? And will they stand up?

remember when a bunch of truckers came by and simply honked and Trudue went into hiding?

Now imagine they decide to actually fight, canada's military has been neglected so long their simply not capable of putting down a revolution.

 

[DarthOne]

remember when a bunch of truckers came by and simply honked and Trudue went into hiding?

Now imagine they decide to actually fight, canada's military has been neglected so long their simply not capable of putting down a revolution.

Especially if they get help from Americans over the border going Freikorps.

 

[The Whispering Monk]

Will they be able to though? And will they stand up?

Yes.

That's up to them.

 

[DarthOne]

Breaking: Calling drag queens "Groomers" not protected speech, judge rules

Breaking: Calling drag queens "Groomers" not protected speech, judge rules

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has ruled that calling drag queens “groomers” does not fall under Ontario’s protected speech laws.

thecountersignal.com

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has ruled that referring to drag queens as "groomers" does not fall under Canada's protected speech laws, setting up potential defamation lawsuits against anyone who uses the term.

The ruling comes in the case of Rainbow Alliance Dryden et al v. Webster, where Justice Nieckarz determined that such statements perpetuate harmful stereotypes and do not constitute expression on a matter of public interest.

Justice Nieckarz ruled that "It is reasonable to conclude that the suggestion that … drag performers are 'groomers', merely because of their sexual or performance identity, is defamatory."

pic.twitter.com/QWPd3LOaEk
— James Lindsay, against magic (@ConceptualJames) June 1, 2023

The case involves a small-town Pride organization, Rainbow Alliance Dryden (RAD), and a local drag king, who filed a defamation action against Brian Webster, a Thunder Bay Facebook blogger.

Egale Canada, a Trudeau-funded far-left organization, was part of the lawsuit against the defendant who called drag queens groomers.

Decision opens doors for defamation lawsuits

The judge's decision allows the plaintiffs to proceed with their legal action against the defendant, and more importantly, effectively sets the stage for making it illegal to refer to men who wear lingerie and read books to children as "groomers."

The plaintiffs took Webster to court after he made a Facebook post, which was shared on a page with a substantial readership in northwestern Ontario, where he accused RAD of sexualizing children and recruiting them into the 2SLGBTQI community.

The post triggered a wave of comments from the public, including accusations of pedophilia.

Justice Nieckarz rejected Webster's anti-SLAPP motion, emphasizing that the expression did not relate to a matter of public interest, claiming it went beyond critique of a CBC article.

"The Defendant's comments went well beyond that, perpetuating hurtful myths and stereotypes about vulnerable members in our society. Webster's argument that he was accusing the CBC of grooming has no merit based on a plain reading of the post," Justice Nieckarz said.

The words in Webster's post were deemed defamatory, implying that drag performers were manipulating children for pedophilic purposes. The court noted that accusing a group of individuals of being "groomers" is likely to cause serious harm to reputation.

Additionally, the court found that Webster could not avail himself of the defense of fair comment, as there was no factual basis for the allegation, and the statements were not recognizable as an opinion but as statements of fact.

With the anti-SLAPP motion dismissed, the plaintiffs can now proceed with their legal action, marking a significant legal precedent against calling drag queens groomers in Canada.

Gays against Groomers regularly condemns the indoctrination of children into Pride
A group on X called "Gays against Groomers" has over 400,000 followers, and regularly posts about the LGBT movement indoctrinating children.

"It may be the first day of pride month, but there is NO PRIDE in the sexualization, indoctrination, and mutilation of children," the group posted on June 1.

They added, "The rainbow has been hijacked by activists who are using it as a shield to push a dangerous agenda onto your kids."