CarlManvers2019
Writers Blocked Douchebag
This is like one of a couple examples of what I hate about modern fiction that is liberal arts related.
But superheroes have always been about social justice!!!
This is like one of a couple examples of what I hate about modern fiction that is liberal arts related.
When they dont incite terrorism sureBut superheroes have always been about social justice!!!
When they dont incite terrorism sure
I am glad the military doesnt allow protests in uniform. Because any pro military pro police pro 2nd amendment laws things would go bad.Dude, I’ve seen guys on SB, they think ANTIFA are great guys and they won’t call them terrorists and just think they’re freedom fighters of a sort or aren’t doing any horrible stuff to begin with and even compare them with regular superheroes
I still remember that one Worm/Symphogear fic
Call me crazy or obsessed but there is something you gotta get annoyed with a user saying “ANTIFA Purity” as a description....I swear they weren’t this obsessed with the E88 years ago
But that is another thing that pisses me off about fiction.
The military is useless!
I am glad the military doesnt allow protests in uniform. Because any pro military pro police pro 2nd amendment laws things would go bad.
You cant have a history of major physical issues or mental issues. Minor stuff ir stuff long ago is fine as long as your good physically. Depends on branch and Job your gonna do.And made of cannon fodder
I'm not American, but I think that your military pretty much only allows perfect or absolutely no mental or physical problems whatsoever before entering, and have to be whittled down in training before they're even allowed to call themselves part of the armed forces.
And that's why they actually cost so much......"Military Industrial Complex" acts as if they're really fucking cheap and incompetent
Wait, what? Protests in uniform?
Also, I think if they protest in uniform, they won't be received well
Can see lots of Nazi and Police State accusations if they did that
You cant have a history of major physical issues or mental issues. Minor stuff ir stuff long ago is fine as long as your good physically. Depends on branch and Job your gonna do.
And America spends more on thier military then some do on thier whole countru
You could also include Karen Traviss into this as well. Without an editor (a good one) she really is not the best. With an editor she is pretty good.One thing I'd note above other, more minor or forgivable, complaints, is when an author's success leads into their own editing or their publisher's editing of their works down to fade into nothingness.
The largest examples which occur to me being Tom Clancy, Robert Jordan, and David Weber. All three have some damn good, perhaps even great, works under their belt, but in all three cases by my experience (incomplete with Jordan, admittedly), initial heights in all three cases slowly succumb to a more and more absent editing process that sees storylines and character interactions that should be the meat of any story overtaken by technical manual or pointless, wandering, almanac-style worldbuilding in their later novels. Clancy and Weber in the 'narrate technology and object actions for multiple pages' avenue, and Jordan in the 'go on and on for a few pages about the wood that makes up the bed the main character is waking up in' style. Tight and composed storylines that make for great novels thus grow into these doorstoppers where, while there might be some good stuff within, sees it buried under technical details and 'conference table discussion' disease instead of anything which makes for an engaging read--Jordan especially I, for one, got to the point of skipping past paragraphs and even pages at a time because the dude's ability to keep any kind of rein on himself seemed to gradually abandon him after the first few books.
*prinCZess fades into distance ranting about Tom Clancy and Weber's similar failures*
Problem is that publishers are unwilling to set rules to the author when said author can just move to another one that promises them more "creative freedom". Adding to this, editors have a bad reputation.*prinCZess fades into distance ranting about Tom Clancy and Weber's similar failures*
One thing I'd note above other, more minor or forgivable, complaints, is when an author's success leads into their own editing or their publisher's editing of their works down to fade into nothingness.
The largest examples which occur to me being Tom Clancy, Robert Jordan, and David Weber. All three have some damn good, perhaps even great, works under their belt, but in all three cases by my experience (incomplete with Jordan, admittedly), initial heights in all three cases slowly succumb to a more and more absent editing process that sees storylines and character interactions that should be the meat of any story overtaken by technical manual or pointless, wandering, almanac-style worldbuilding in their later novels. Clancy and Weber in the 'narrate technology and object actions for multiple pages' avenue, and Jordan in the 'go on and on for a few pages about the wood that makes up the bed the main character is waking up in' style. Tight and composed storylines that make for great novels thus grow into these doorstoppers where, while there might be some good stuff within, sees it buried under technical details and 'conference table discussion' disease instead of anything which makes for an engaging read--Jordan especially I, for one, got to the point of skipping past paragraphs and even pages at a time because the dude's ability to keep any kind of rein on himself seemed to gradually abandon him after the first few books.
*prinCZess fades into distance ranting about Tom Clancy and Weber's similar failures*