She actually. And, y'know help ensure the future of our nation by creating families. In the case of transgenders, the transexual women can't get pregnant but I'm sure there's orphans who need families and they still need mothers at home to help tend to their rearing as the matriarch.
I mean I do think it's bad to force women to pursue an occupation. I would get much more fulfillment from being at home with my children and making sure my home is in running order rather than slaving away at some 9-5 that I and I believe most women are ill-suited for.
Just a suggestion here, but how about we leave adults to decide for themselves how they ought to live out their lives, whatever their gender? If you enjoy taking care of your children then great for you! But that does not mean everyone is obligated to follow your example. There are plenty of arrangements that work just as well, such as the male being the caretaker, or both partners sharing that responsibly, or families with two males or two females who shared the responsibility, possibly even more than two parents, although I don't think such a thing is common yet, but given the growing popularity of polyamorous relationships its only a matter of time before they pop up.
In some cases even the grandparents fullfil that role.
Single parent households are also a thing, although personally I think it risks that the children grow up with a mostly absent parent so that's not ideal (although who knows, maybe some can make that work)
In short there are many ways for parents to raise children, what works for one family doesn't necessarily works for another.
Traditional family structure is awesome - for couples who feel comfortable with it.
As long as the children are not neglected and receive the attention, affection and education they require to grow in a psychologically healthy way, I don't feel there is any need to judge exactly
how this is achieved.