Military US Military Is Scared Americans Won't Fight For Globalism

[Bacle]

what

Most of the powers in DC have bought into the lies of Malthus and of overpopulation of the planet, along with the climate catastrophic BS, and want to 'pare down' how many people are in the world, including in the US.

They've been at it for decades, starting back with forced sterilizations of Native Americans even into the 60s, and with their policies of trying to destroy the family unit with stuff like no fault divorce and praising single motherhood.

It's also why they praise the troon shit, as it's people sterilizing themselves while being told they are brave and yet oppressed.

The powers in DC want there to be less humans period, including their voters, and the DoD still hasn't caught the fucking memo because it's trying very hard not to notice things like that about it's chain of command.

 

[Yinko]

Has the DoD or Pentagon ever been willing to say to Congress "Why are you making it so we have fewer and fewer people to recruit from going forward period, with your anti-natal policies?"

...What?

The effects of any anti-natalist policy would not be felt by recruitment for approximately two decades after the fact. Few of those politicians would have still been responsible, and any fix would not affect the problem for a further couple of decades.

Ultimately, less than 1% of the US population enlists in the military overall, most of them come from the South, Ohio, California and New York (with the latter three being due to high population density). There are also a disproportionate rate of Filipinos and Hispanics, with Puerto Ricans out weighing most other groups of Hispanics overall.

US anti-natalist policies are not going to affect enlistment by foreign born individuals, of which there are many. Overall the rate of enlistment (approx 1%) isn't going to change any time soon either. You also have to consider, that a lot of those who enlist tend to be: relatively conservative and religious (aka Southern), and interested in getting married (if for the perks if nothing else). So military members tend to have kids, the military covers most of the costs of raising children anyway. Another major sector of recruitment is military brats.

If the military really wanted to end the recruitment issues at present, just make it so that illegal immigrants could join (at present you need an SSID number). Or over the long term just provide an unlimited cap on the added benefits per dependent, so that more kids equaled more money for their service members, so there would be a bumper crop of military brats ready for recruitment in twenty years.

 

[Zachowon]

What are you asking of me @Zachowon?

How one looks at the military, those that were in tend to understand it better then those that wernt.
For instance look at SECARM. She never served

I mean the DoD is acting as if the civil government's depopulation schemes don't factor into recruitment shortfalls, not just internal abortion issues (which are a peripheral part of the whole depopulation angle).

Has the DoD or Pentagon ever been willing to say to Congress "Why are you making it so we have fewer and fewer people to recruit from going forward period, with your anti-natal policies?"

As others have said it literally has no part in it.
Add in most people in the military have kids

 

[Spartan303]

How one looks at the military, those that were in tend to understand it better then those that wernt.

Correct, yes.

 

[Zachowon]

Correct, yes.

As can be seen by the Secretary of the Army

 

[Bacle]

Well this should be a wake up call about how 'apolitical' the US military currently is.

 

[Zachowon]

What's funny is they can not stop you from participating in things in your free time.
As long as it isn't illegal

 

[Bacle]

What's funny is they can not stop you from participating in things in your free time.
As long as it isn't illegal

'could jeopardize your continued service' is a threat, plain and simple.

Never heard of something like this being issued for a Turning Point's speaker before.

 

[DarthOne]

What's funny is they can not stop you from participating in things in your free time.
As long as it isn't illegal

Denial isn’t a River in Africa

 

[Zachowon]

'could jeopardize your continued service' is a threat, plain and simple.

Never heard of something like this being issued for a Turning Point's speaker before.

They can not use what you do outside of work against you as long as you are there as an individual.
Since none of the groups there are labeled as terror groups, they can not be punished.

Denial isn’t a River in Africa

You are right

 

[S'task]

They can not use what you do outside of work against you as long as you are there as an individual.
Since none of the groups there are labeled as terror groups, they can not be punished.

You are right

Zach, while I normally sympathize with your defense of the military, this is both an indefensible act AND something you're not understanding how real world things like this work.

Yes, on paper, they cannot hold participation against someone; however, anyone who does go and is found out will likely be given bad performance reviews, or have a note about "subverting discipline" or other seemingly mundane statement that on paper looks legitimate but really amounts to "marked to have career stagnate" due to "not conforming". That's what the threat of "could jeopardize your continued service" means. It doesn't mean they will seek to drum a person out, but rather, associating with those individuals will mean your career advancement prospects are dead, so you might as well just serve your term and then get out.

What makes this even more egregious is that Turning Points isn't far right or anything of the sort, they're so middle road right wing they often get called "establishment" types. Frankly, if they're willing to make threats about this, they're willing to go after ALL Conservatives, they've dropped the fig leaf of going after "alt-right" or "right wing extremists".

 

[Zachowon]

Zach, while I normally sympathize with your defense of the military, this is both an indefensible act AND something you're not understanding how real world things like this work.

Yes, on paper, they cannot hold participation against someone; however, anyone who does go and is found out will likely be given bad performance reviews, or have a note about "subverting discipline" or other seemingly mundane statement that on paper looks legitimate but really amounts to "marked to have career stagnate" due to "not conforming". That's what the threat of "could jeopardize your continued service" means. It doesn't mean they will seek to drum a person out, but rather, associating with those individuals will mean your career advancement prospects are dead, so you might as well just serve your term and then get out.

What makes this even more egregious is that Turning Points isn't far right or anything of the sort, they're so middle road right wing they often get called "establishment" types. Frankly, if they're willing to make threats about this, they're willing to go after ALL Conservatives, they've dropped the fig leaf of going after "alt-right" or "right wing extremists".

And the most they could do is a summerized Article 15 or a Company grade.
He'll even if they do give a field grade article 15 it wouldn't even inhibit thier career.

Besides the fact that in the AF juniors are already being stagnant in thier ranks due to beurocracy and allowing of E5s to retire.

I have been keeping in the know with how the branches work through friends and myself.

There is literally nothing the AF can actually do to inhibit the airmen from going to the event. No matter what ever arguments can be made, IG and even the HRC review board for thier NCOs and the like will not allow it to go through.

Remember. Af has the largest diffrence between officers and enlisted.

 

[Blasterbot]

Zach. If the guys above you want to make your life miserable they can. and they would do it entirely within military regulations. If they decided to make you hate your job so you would get out early? they could do it. If they decided that Zach should be passed over for growth opportunities and career advancement they could. It getting blown up here means it is likely happening elsewhere and not being blown up. this is bad. this undermines the politically neutral image the military likes to maintain. it justifies people not wanting to join based on this sort of stuff.

 

[The Whispering Monk]

Zach. If the guys above you want to make your life miserable they can. and they would do it entirely within military regulations. If they decided to make you hate your job so you would get out early? they could do it. If they decided that Zach should be passed over for growth opportunities and career advancement they could. It getting blown up here means it is likely happening elsewhere and not being blown up. this is bad. this undermines the politically neutral image the military likes to maintain. it justifies people not wanting to join based on this sort of stuff.

You're absolutely right. But there are LOADS of things that the enlisted ranks can do to totally FUBAR the Command if they take that route.

 

[DarthOne]

You're absolutely right. But there are LOADS of things that the enlisted ranks can do to totally FUBAR the Command if they take that route.

But will they? And does the Command think they have to worry about it?

He asks, glancing over to the forced COVID clot shot that was pushed on the enlisted rank along with most of the citizenship and how little push back happened at the time.

 

[The Whispering Monk]

He asks, glancing over to the forced COVID clot shot that was pushed on the enlisted rank along with most of the citizenship and how little push back happened at the time.

Unfortunately, that's something that DOD gets to do to its soldiery in an effort to keep them at fighting trim. Every soldier and officer signs up for it. Though, to be fair, no recruiter ever really tells their 'prey' this.

The error here was that it was completely experimental with NO long-term testing really done which has ended up hurting the soldiery. So consequences must happen to the Pharma-corp.

 

[Zachowon]

Zach. If the guys above you want to make your life miserable they can. and they would do it entirely within military regulations. If they decided to make you hate your job so you would get out early? they could do it. If they decided that Zach should be passed over for growth opportunities and career advancement they could. It getting blown up here means it is likely happening elsewhere and not being blown up. this is bad. this undermines the politically neutral image the military likes to maintain. it justifies people not wanting to join based on this sort of stuff.

I mean, besides the fact even with how political I am, I make up fir it eith my work ethic and knowledge in my field.
It also helps that at least in the army, there is always someone who supports you if you are at least somewhat of a good soldier.
Networking with people is a big oart of it

You're absolutely right. But there are LOADS of things that the enlisted ranks can do to totally FUBAR the Command if they take that route.

IG and JAG love to get thier hands on this.
Well that and contacting your Congresscritter.
Or you make thier lives hell by just having the E4 mafia do thier stuff

 

[Bacle]

I'm seeing military members who think the memo leaking is the bigger issue, and that the person who did it was a 'shitbag' because they cared about TPUSA being false labelled Alt-Right/Far-Right, and don't care about the implied threat.

The hate that FOX got ahold of this, because they want no one to care about the Progressive politicization of the military terminology/definitions, and don't want to look at the implications of the DoD pushing policies where groups like TPUSA are thought of as 'far-right'/'alt-right'.

 

[Yinko]

I'm seeing military members who think the memo leaking is the bigger issue, and that the person who did it was a 'shitbag' because they cared about TPUSA being false labelled Alt-Right/Far-Right, and don't care about the implied threat.

The hate that FOX got ahold of this, because they want no one to care about the Progressive politicization of the military terminology/definitions, and don't want to look at the implications of the DoD pushing policies where groups like TPUSA are thought of as 'far-right'/'alt-right'.

Unless the memo was labelled as CUI or higher then there is no justification to be upset. If the argument is "airing dirty laundry" then that by itself is an admission that the memo was wrong.

 

[Bacle]

Unless the memo was labelled as CUI or higher then there is no justification to be upset. If the argument is "airing dirty laundry" then that by itself is an admission that the memo was wrong.

No, they are upset because it brought public scrutiny to an issue they want to pretend doesn't matter, because they don't want to admit DC is pushing woke shit down the ranks, and cling to the political sections of the UCMJ as if they are a salve for the PR fuck-up and want to blame it all on a few individuals at the base.

They are upset because something they don't see as a 'big deal' has become one.

Edit: Heck, the ones I've seen say it was likely someone in the medical group on the base, and they treat that as an insult for it to have happened. They think it was an edgelord or attention seeker, instead of someone trying to whistleblow and warn about the political shape of the DoD/that base.

If a military doctor/corpman gave this to FOX, it would explain a lot; the old maxim about 'The is nothing so unmilitary as a military doctor' springs to mind.