Military US Military Is Scared Americans Won't Fight For Globalism




This is just embarrassing; I've worked in cannabis grows with tighter security than this guy's chain of command exercised.

There is justified whistleblowing on abuses, and then there is an entire chain of command kinda forgetting why the two-man rules exists for classified stuff.
 



This is just embarrassing; I've worked in cannabis grows with tighter security than this guy's chain of command exercised.

There is justified whistleblowing on abuses, and then there is an entire chain of command kinda forgetting why the two-man rules exists for classified stuff.

I mean, I know Tangos (Army version for what he does) that basically Run the Hugh classification net for my MOS.
Does that mean they are always two deep for everything?
No.
That only applies when having TS outside of a SCIF.
 
I mean, I know Tangos (Army version for what he does) that basically Run the Hugh classification net for my MOS.
Does that mean they are always two deep for everything?
No.
That only applies when having TS outside of a SCIF.
The problem is, this was a 3-guy nightshift in a classified storage area, where all they were supposed to due was monitor HVAC and answer phones.

There was no requirement that they stay within sight of each other, or or basic security precautions, and security concerns bypassed/overlook at multiple levels in the squadron/higher up.

That this dude ever got to the position he was in, with access to that level of stuff when he was there for HVAC monitoring...we got really lucky this dude was just out to show off to discord for e-cred, and not trying to sell shit to our enemies.
 
The problem is, this was a 3-guy nightshift in a classified storage area, where all they were supposed to due was monitor HVAC and answer phones.

There was no requirement that they stay within sight of each other, or or basic security precautions, and security concerns bypassed/overlook at multiple levels in the squadron/higher up.

That this dude ever got to the position he was in, with access to that level of stuff when he was there for HVAC monitoring...we got really lucky this dude was just out to show off to discord for e-cred, and not trying to sell shit to our enemies.
So, you do know that you have to have someone who has the classification to monitor those during repairs right?
In the SCIF I am leaving due to PCS, I had to monitor the cleaning personnel. Same with HVAC repair.
The fact documents were left in the open is a big no no and a huge security risk.
The other thing is. If he had access to any computers woth logins, either it was his own or even worse security from the squadron.

But my point is this.
Those who monitor HVAC in classified areas are often those who work there
 
So, you do know that you have to have someone who has the classification to monitor those during repairs right?
In the SCIF I am leaving due to PCS, I had to monitor the cleaning personnel. Same with HVAC repair.
The fact documents were left in the open is a big no no and a huge security risk.
The other thing is. If he had access to any computers woth logins, either it was his own or even worse security from the squadron.

But my point is this.
Those who monitor HVAC in classified areas are often those who work there

I think part of the problem is that if one makes the security rules too much of a bother to comply with, people are going to start to ignore them.
I've seen this in the IT industry.
 
I think part of the problem is that if one makes the security rules too much of a bother to comply with, people are going to start to ignore them.
I've seen this in the IT industry.
When you are dealing with national security, there are a lot of rules
Like if you have higher clearances less people can see and more measures are taken
 
Y6rOUC6ZAGFH.jpeg
 
The American military's leadership openly admit they want to keep our lives from improving to maintain the supply of desperately poor people willing to become cannon fodder.
Who'd want to fight for that?
 
The American military's leadership openly admit they want to keep our lives from improving to maintain the supply of desperately poor people willing to become cannon fodder.
Who'd want to fight for that?

What's next, forcibly recruiting people if they touch the King's Shilling? Because it's the same 'offer miliary service to escape from poverty/joblessness so you can fight and die for the sake of your Overlords' tactic the British Empire did back in the day.
 
The American military's leadership openly admit they want to keep our lives from improving to maintain the supply of desperately poor people willing to become cannon fodder.
Who'd want to fight for that?
What's next, forcibly recruiting people if they touch the King's Shilling? Because it's the same 'offer miliary service to escape from poverty/joblessness so you can fight and die for the sake of your Overlords' tactic the British Empire did back in the day.

You're bitching about politicians unaffiliated with the military.
 
All over the damn place. Some in the USA, some in Africa, some in China...

And these days, probably just as many people as robots.
Actually a lot is done by hand.
And a good mix.
It does go to a lot of US jobs as we have had to revamp a lot kf production for arms, increasing American work load.



You're bitching about politicians unaffiliated with the military.
They also seem.tp think everyone is infantry and is going to be put into the trenches to die.

90% if the military is not combat arms but everything supporting them. Sure we may face combat every now and then, but we arnt the ones who will be sent to fight fight.


Edit: military student loan forgiveness is permanent while Bidens is temporary.
And I get 100% free college or even a trade.
 
No. It benefits the Globalists and Corporations that run the West. Not the USA. And not Europe either.
Now you are clowning for your politics.
Of all the western corporations, it's not the MIC who pioneered outsourcing to China, if anything those are legally restricted in doing it, unlike many others.
 
Yeah, there's laws that prohibit manufacture of certain military equipment and items outside of the US. While the Federal government certain did things to enable offshoring, and the MIC has done shady shit in the past, hollowing out the private industry sector isn't something the MIC wanted, encouraged, nor enabled. In fact, the MIC has been complaining about the offshoring of a lot things because it actually makes their ability to maintain their supply chains as well as reducing the number of skilled industrial labor in the US they need to draw from.

Remember: Clinton hated the Military and the MIC. It wasn't until Obama that the MIC started leaning towards Democrats and wokeness, which happened in large part because Obama purposefully politicized procurement and the military in ways to reward Dem patrons and punish Republican leaning corporations.

But enabling offshoring and the government structures put in place to do that? That was all set up under Clinton.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top