I guess I am just going to have to spell it out explicitly, then.There are two problems with that approach.
It starts off with letting them control the debate and define what the debate even is. So anyone actually wanting push back on them is starting at a losing position.
And secondly you are framing it as the right needing to moderate the worst of the extreme lefts positions. That just means the right automatically loses just not as fast as if the left had total power.
A compromise between freedom and tyranny just means they get to control half of things and if you keep doing those kind of compromises it only gets worse, never better.
We need to push them back not accept their premise and slow them down a little.
The Right does not set the terms of the debate on the environment in the modern culture and political scene.
It can curb the worst of the rad-green ideas via things like the Climate Caucus, but the Right is in no cultural or political position to decide which environmental issues are legit or not.
Stop thinking the Right can 'win' on this by just ignoring or dismissing what the Left says; the people in the Climate Caucus get this.